Another mere assumption.
You don't know anything about me.
I'll happily look at and honestly evaluate any evidence you throw at me.
I suspect that the reason you simply assume I wouldn't, is because you know that your evidence is either of very low credibility, or it's just plain non-existent.
Yes, I do expect that you do not have quality evidence at all for any of these claims. The primary reason for that is because if you would have, it would have surfaced a long time ago already and I would already be aware of it.
But any how, in the off chance that I'm wrong about that, I still ask for evidence of anyone who makes these claims.
Curiously, none of them are ever either willing or able to provide it. Strange, isn't it?
How would you know, if you never actually show it?