• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tucker Carlson: What is a woman?

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Yes .. and I don't feel like writing a book tonight.
It would be easier to list the ways we are the same I think, it would be a shorter book.

I am married as well! I find there are differences, but also differences between my wife and other women. And differences between myself and other men.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
You think Tucker "M&Ms aren't sexy enough any more" Carlson is a reasonable person to look to on issues of gender?

Tucker Carlson Widely Mocked After Criticizing ‘Less Sexy’ M&Ms
I observe Tucker (anyone) and take the good things (for me) and leave what I don't need AND see things in perspective

What I don't need might be useful for others

So, I "YouTube'd" to see what Tucker had to say on this

The thing I notice in this YouTube is, that Tucker creates something and these 2 women dive "high heels" in. So, obviously Tucker Carlson is important to the 2 women, otherwise they would have just ignored his comments, right?

My guess: The women make such a YouTube to earn some dollars and do it in a way they enjoy it, making fun of others. Well, that is not something strange, happens a lot

Tucker has to make a living and needs to fill his working hours with lots of talking...obviously not 100% of interest to me, but I am not the only viewer,

so, as I said "I ditch what I don't need" AND I don't see the need to judge his view on "non chocolate" items, keeping in mind what he said about chocolate

Even on RF some people keep on posting on threads that I find totally irrelevant, there is this thread, the longest one...many on RF keep posting there, obviously important to them...

Tucker articulates much better than most people I hear, that in itself is amazing. So, again I take what I "need" and leave other stuff for others

Like, the anecdote about the Master "dropping the woman he carried over the river" while his diciple, even days later still thought "how could my Master do this, he is supposed to not touch women"
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
Scientists separate sex and gender, too.
It is not, in fact, accurate to say 'cool only refers to temperature' when temperature is only one part of a definition of 'cool.'

She wasn't confused. She acknowledged the very real consideration of 'woman' as more than just physiology. Whether or not conservatives participate in that discussion is of no consequence to me. They don't participate in a lot of things against their beliefs.
So much to learn, and all because Tucker created something

RF thinks a lot about Tucker, so obviously Tucker is useful to some
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
I am married as well! I find there are differences, but also differences between my wife and other women. And differences between myself and other men.
Of course... but there's a reason a comedian can get laughs with the difference between men and women, most people in the audience have experienced something like what he's talking about because there are predictable differences between the sexes.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Of course... but there's a reason a comedian can get laughs with the difference between men and women, most people in the audience have experienced something like what he's talking about because there are predictable differences between the sexes.

Part of the reason comedians get laughs is from the stereotyping of behavior. Sure, people can relate, but only because it is exaggerated. Otherwise, would it even be funny?
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Part of the reason comedians get laughs is from the stereotyping of behavior. Sure, people can relate, but only because it is exaggerated. Otherwise, would it even be funny?
Of course it's exaggerated a bit but it has a basis in truth or no one could relate to it. . the whole reason we get the stereotypes is because we experience them.
 

Guitar's Cry

Disciple of Pan
Of course it's exaggerated a bit but it has a basis in truth or no one could relate to it. . the whole reason we get the stereotypes is because we experience them.

Already, I think our discussion shows that "women" aren't easily definable, and certainly not "primitive and basic," eh?

I certainly don't consider my wife in this. She's a complicated individual that prefers I be honest about my "weaknesses" and understands me as a complicated individual.
 

Kooky

Freedom from Sanity
In short I follow the instructions given in my Scripture Yoga Vasista:

1) Accept the Truth, even if given by a fool
2) Reject UnTruth even if given by "God" Himself
So what do you say, are M&Ms sexy enough yet?
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
So what do you say, are M&Ms sexy enough yet?
Thanks...

Falls in the category "don't care"..UnTruth.. maya
In short I follow the instructions given in my Scripture Yoga Vasista:

1) Accept the Truth, even if given by a fool
2) Reject UnTruth even if given by "God" Himself
My Goal = Truth, not sexy M&Ms
 
Last edited:
Top