"Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." -- Dictionary .com.Define liberal please in context of this timeframe.
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." -- Dictionary .com.Define liberal please in context of this timeframe.
"Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." -- Dictionary .com.
Liberalism - Wikipedia
But straight white men no longer feel secure in their status. They feel threatened by presumptuous members of the underclasses presuming equality.Plus, I think since straight white men were pretty secure in their roles as patriarchal kings they felt no need to lash out.
Isn't all social progress a result of liberal values triumphing over conservative opposition?In the period from 1917-1930 "liberal" theology supported women's right to vote and contraception.
Isn't all social progress a result of liberal values triumphing over conservative opposition?
THEN:"Open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." -- Dictionary .com.
Liberalism - Wikipedia
Most of the federals were as racist as the confederates, and the presumed purpose of the war was to preserve the union, not to abolish slavery.It actually took an army to abolish it.
Both sides were christian, and neither set out to abolish slavery. Abolition was a northern tactic to sow economic harm and chaos in the South.There were Christian abolitionists. Your grasp of history is poor. The end of slavery was not some secular atheists group movement. It was Christians fighting Christians at least in the US as the majority. For the rest of the planet it was Christian nations telling other people what to do.
Relevance?Please list here 10 public schools where they were shootings, and 10 parochial:
Why is it that you see atheists behind every tree?Yes, that is EXACTLY what atheists are doing on this thread. Thanks for discerning that!
LOL -- I assume that's a rhetorical question.Yes. Who goes backwards?
Wasn't slavery a feature in most complex societies throughout history, including christian?THEN:
Since slavery wasn't a "Christian construct" and Christians only participated in it for 3 to 4 centuries while Muslims for over a millennia, then one would have to say it was the "liberals" who discarded Christian traditional values and Conservative Christians eradicated it.
THEN:
Since slavery wasn't a "Christian construct" and Christians only participated in it for 3 to 4 centuries while Muslims for over a millennia, then one would have to say it was the "liberals" who discarded Christian traditional values and Conservative Christians eradicated it.
I found this to be balanced and informative:Wasn't slavery a feature in most complex societies throughout history, including christian?
Where are you getting "only 3 to 4 centuries?"
Who said anything about "black" slavery?I found this to be balanced and informative:
https://www.equip.org/article/christianity-black-slavery/
Both sides were christian, and neither set out to abolish slavery.
Abolition was a northern tactic to sow economic harm and chaos in the South.
The liberal, idealistic abolitionists predated the war.
Im not denying that. Im pointing out one of those groups were quoting the Bible, and doing it in proper context.
The other group said god was wrong. Not with those words, but they put aside scripture for reason, they realized there is a mistake, and said what god allows isnt good.
They have nothing in the Bible when it comes to the issue of slavery. Paul sealed the deal when he told Christian slaves to serve especially well if they have a Christian master.
Lies make baby Jesus cry. The OP clearly highlights an Evangelical politician blaming gun violence on a lack of school imposed religious practice.Yes, that is EXACTLY what atheists are doing on this thread. Thanks for discerning that!
Yes, that is EXACTLY what atheists are doing on this thread. Thanks for discerning that!
I have. The Bible condones slavery. The side fighting for slavery was the one accurately citing it.Context such as what? Cite something.
What else do you call it when someone says something is a great evil but god says it's ok and permits it? Simply put, they called themselves Christian, but they had a greater sense of morality than the god of the Bible.Evidence?
The evidence is that no where, not once, not ever in entire Bible is slavery condemned. To the contrary Jehovah permits it and reinforces the idea that people can be captured or given away like animals and bought and sold like commodities.Evidence?