• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Unbelievable But Not Unexpected

Father Heathen

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
mball1297 said:
No, the thing is when it's something like that couple who were both being penetrated by the horse (sorry to get so graphic), the horse was obviously initiating it, or else he could just not have done it at all. When the roles are reversed, that's one thing, but in cases like this, the animal obviously consents. If I was a horse, I'd have no problem with it, if I initiated it.
Click to expand...

lol, that interview vid was both disturbing and hilarious.
 
Magic Man

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
Father Heathen said:
lol, that interview vid was both disturbing and hilarious.
Click to expand...

Indeed it was! It's hard to believe people actually doing that sort of thing. My only point was that, in cases like that, the horse obviously gives consent by mounting a person willingly. In other cases where it's not obvious, I am fully against anyone doing it.
 
.lava

.lava

Veteran Member
mball1297 said:
So, what's the problem? I'm reminded of a video link posted recently by Father Heathen I think. It was a Youtube video about a couple who like to both have sex with the woman's horse. Since the horse did all of the work, I would assume the horse was consenting. I personally find the idea repulsive, but why should we stop people from doing things like that?
Click to expand...

being an animal with an animal is not humane. of course animal would not think, they are smart as much as they needed to survive but they do not have intellect. all the animals take advantage of situations. when they need to pee they immediately do it. they do not look for WC. when they needed sex, they do it wherever they find opportunity. they do not ask for privacy. because they are animals. we should not expect them to act humane. but those people who choses to act like an animal, they make a choice. they are humans who acts like animals. is it free? sure! also pathetic.

little kid would not judge what is really happening either. because they do not know this world. so they would not complain. take this example; a researcher lady accidently finds out about incest. a little girl says "i am feeding with my father's milk". she does not complaint. she thinks it is milk.

oh dear, i feel sick again :(











.
 
3.14

3.14

Well-Known Member
there are only a couple of animals known to have sex for fun if those animals partake in it i have no problem with it but if animals partake in it wich only have sex to reproduce then you are "robbing" him of a chance to reproduce
 
Magic Man

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
.lava said:
being an animal with an animal is not humane. of course animal would not think, they are smart as much as they needed to survive but they do not have intellect. all the animals take advantage of situations. when they need to pee they immediately do it. they do not look for WC. when they needed sex, they do it wherever they find opportunity. they do not ask for privacy. because they are animals. we should not expect them to act humane. but those people who choses to act like an animal, they make a choice. they are humans who acts like animals. is it free? sure! also pathetic.

little kid would not judge what is really happening either. because they do not know this world. so they would not complain. take this example; a researcher lady accidently finds out about incest. a little girl says "i am feeding with my father's milk". she does not complaint. she thinks it is milk.

oh dear, i feel sick again :(











.
Click to expand...

I'm not really sure what you mean here. I don't see how it's inhumane "to be an animal with an animal". It doesn't hurt the animal. And if it does, or could, hurt the animal, then it is inhumane and wrong.

3.14 said:
there are only a couple of animals known to have sex for fun if those animals partake in it i have no problem with it but if animals partake in it wich only have sex to reproduce then you are "robbing" him of a chance to reproduce
Click to expand...

Really? Even though the animal would have a perfectly good chance to reproduce anyway with the next animal of its own kind that it met? It's not robbing it of a chance to reproduce. If you weren't there, it just wouldn't have sex at all, and thereby still not have a chance to reproduce.
 
Last edited:
.lava

.lava

Veteran Member
mball1297 said:
I'm not really sure what you mean here. I don't see how it's inhumane "to be an animal with an animal". It doesn't hurt the animal. And if it does, or could, hurt the animal, then it is inhumane and wrong.
Click to expand...

experiencing sexuality like an animal is inhumane. no intimacy, no loyalty, no privacy, no communication, no sharing, no understanding, no loving, no respect, no caring...etc...while a human being is given a chance to live sexuality with these specialty, he prefers not to. instead, he experiences some thing much more shallow. as if he was not given valuable and deep emotions. so he lives simply as a physical being -flesh and bones. that is the reason why some people do not really mind whom they have sex with. as long as they have pleasure they can even have sex with animals. it is inhumane, because these emotions they refuse are humane. what they are experiencing is less than what a human being could experience. they lessen themselves.


.


 
Magic Man

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
.lava said:
experiencing sexuality like an animal is inhumane. no intimacy, no loyalty, no privacy, no communication, no sharing, no understanding, no loving, no respect, no caring...etc...while a human being is given a chance to live sexuality with these specialty, he prefers not to. instead, he experiences some thing much more shallow. as if he was not given valuable and deep emotions. so he lives simply as a physical being -flesh and bones. that is the reason why some people do not really mind whom they have sex with. as long as they have pleasure they can even have sex with animals. it is inhumane, because these emotions they refuse are humane. what they are experiencing is less than what a human being could experience. they lessen themselves.


.
Click to expand...

I think this might just be a translation thing. It sounds to me like you're using the word "inhuman" to mean "inhumane". Inhumane simply means treating others, especially animals, cruelly and harshly. Your description sounds more like they are acting inhumanly, as in more like an animal than a human. That might very well be true, but it's much different than them acting inhumanely. For them to be inhumane, they would have to somehow harm the animal. This happens in many cases, but in some cases of bestiality, it not only doesn't harm the animal, but helps it in a way.
 
.lava

.lava

Veteran Member
mball1297 said:
I think this might just be a translation thing. It sounds to me like you're using the word "inhuman" to mean "inhumane". Inhumane simply means treating others, especially animals, cruelly and harshly. Your description sounds more like they are acting inhumanly, as in more like an animal than a human. That might very well be true, but it's much different than them acting inhumanely. For them to be inhumane, they would have to somehow harm the animal. This happens in many cases, but in some cases of bestiality, it not only doesn't harm the animal, but helps it in a way.
Click to expand...

yea i guess this is a translation thing.
i meant to say 'less than what they really are'. i do not mean harming an animal.

well, ok then :) thanks for explanation.



.
 
zenzero

zenzero

Its only a Label
friends,
Now, do we see AIDS in animals in future?
hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Love & rgds
 
Magic Man

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
3.14 said:
you would waste his "bodely fluids", and most animals only mount other people/things if there in heat
Click to expand...
Animals tend to constantly produce these fluids. You'd waste what he had, but he'd make more, and nothing would be lost in the end.

So what if they only mount when they're in heat? They still do it, and as I've now shown, nothing is lost.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
mball1297 said:
Animals tend to constantly produce these fluids. You'd waste what he had, but he'd make more, and nothing would be lost in the end.

So what if they only mount when they're in heat? They still do it, and as I've now shown, nothing is lost.
Click to expand...

This is how I reason when I'm drunk and then hit on the head with a hammer. :D

:biglaugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top