Ben Dhyan
Veteran Member
Your beliefs depend on not understanding. One day though.More assertions without evidence of vague concepts without any logical structure to back them up beyond assuming the conclusion. Yawn.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Your beliefs depend on not understanding. One day though.More assertions without evidence of vague concepts without any logical structure to back them up beyond assuming the conclusion. Yawn.
The ego self believes in soul, whereas the soul is one with the source of life and is not separate from the source, so it comes down to what you self identify with, the body or soul. So a novice spiritual devotee may believe in soul, the more spiritually evolved person will have experienced being united with the source so belief is no longer relevant. Iow, belief in God is only relevant until the union state has been realized, then is not needed any longer.
Your?!?!!? Accusations and taking some sort of egocentric high road does not contribute to the discussionYour beliefs depend on not understanding. One day though.
I don't need conceptual science, physics, and cosmology to understand that the universe exists, reality is forever on the other side of conceptualization of reality.Again subjective beliefs like this is OK, it is your belief. One of many conflicting beliefs, Not much help understanding factually about the cosmology and physics of our universe,
Your?!?!!? Accusations and taking some sort of egocentric high road does not contribute to the discussion
The bottom line is you have shown some basic misunderstanding of science, physics and cosmology based on your religious agenda no matter how superior you feel.
OKI don't need conceptual science, physics, and cosmology to understand that the universe exists,
Not comprehendable and terribly open ended.reality is forever on the other side of conceptualization of reality.
Never is one of those that is never true. I do not always rely on the conceptualization of reality, but your problem is you reject it based on a religious agenda.Try to understand that as long as you are relying on the conceptualization of reality to understand reality, you can never realize it.
I am using conceptualization all the while in these forum exchanges, but yes, as soon as I am not interacting with people, stilling the mind is the priority. Conceptualization has its place, so does a meditative still mind.OK
Not comprehendable and terribly open ended.
Never is one of those that is never true. I do not always rely on the conceptualization of reality, but your problem is you reject it based on a religious agenda.
Actually, I have for many many years studied and practiced meditations and the Arts of the Way (Martial Arts) including nine years in Chinese parks, and stilling the mind. It is very important to one's spiritual well being. Yes the "open mind" is a priority to comprehend the Universal without bias. My belief is it should free us from the burdens of the past, and comprehend reality more clearly as it is and NOT based on ancient tribal paradigms.I am using conceptualization all the while in these forum exchanges, but yes, as soon as I am not interacting with people, stilling the mind is the priority. Conceptualization has its place, so does a meditative still mind.
"free us from the burdens of the past, and comprehend reality more clearly as it is" is precisely the result. A lot of the old 'tribal paradigms' actually become quite meaningful when 'comprehended more clearly', and take on the deeper significance originally intended.Actually, I have for many many years studied and practiced meditations and the Arts of the Way (Martial Arts) including nine years in Chinese parks, and stilling the mind. It is very important to one's spiritual well being. My belief is it should free us from the burdens of the past, and comprehend reality more clearly as it is and NOT based on ancient tribal paradigms. I am 78.
God is all that is, nothing does not exist. From the human perspective, there is a creator/unmanifest aspect of God and a creation manifested aspect, but the two are one. The manifested aspect of God is the material universe, including energy.
Part of this is the acceptance of science as science without the bias of ancient tribal agendas without science."free us from the burdens of the past, and comprehend reality more clearly as it is" is precisely the result.
NoA lot of the old 'tribal paradigms' actually become quite meaningful when 'comprehended more clearly', and take on the deeper significance originally intended.
The red shift, used to explain expansion, can also be explained with increasing entropy, as a replacement for motion. As a thought experiment, say I had a sphere of compressed gas. There are valves on all sides, so when I open all the valves the sphere is designed to remain stationary; propelling forces all cancel. If you ever used spray paint, the can will get colder as you spray, due to the expansion of the gas; paint, increasing entropy and absorbing heat.I debated on whether to get into why we know space is expanding, but at a certain point I'd be explaining the basics forever. So, I will answer questions under each different post about the subjects they contain.
If the laws of physics are the same everywhere, and the galaxies are expanding relative to each other, we should see a uniform final energy background due to the similar galactic emissions of all, more of less processing energy via entropy the same way. Distant objects will get more time to entropy process energy; more time red shifting all the way to microwaves. I think they need to adjust for entropy based red shift beyond motion or Doppler shift.
And part of this is the acceptance of religion as religion without the bias of modern tribal agendas without religion.Part of this is the acceptance of science as science without the bias of ancient tribal agendas without science.
No
If you are referring to science. It does not represent a modern tribal agenda with or without religion, It is simply science as science without an agenda. Science as science is accepted in academics worldwide without tribal boundaries as with religions.And part of this is the acceptance of religion as religion without the bias of modern tribal agendas without religion.
Yes
I was referring to the tribal atheists, agnostics, and lukewarm religious types.If you are referring to science. It does not represent a modern tribal agenda with or without religion, It is simply science as science without an agenda. Science as science is accepted in academics worldwide without tribal boundaries as with religions.
Acceptance of religion as religion? Which one of the many contradictory conflicting religions do propose we should accept above others without the bias.