Dude, you seem to be insinuating as if I am the intellectual author of the assasination as well as the assassin.
@ajay0, I am certainly not insinuating that you are "the intellectual author of the assasination" or, for that matter, of anything else.
The fact of the matter is:
- you chose to address a significant political development,
- you chose to provide what you believe to be important context, but
- you then proceeded to avoid addressing Canada's claim and whine about the question.
... Canada told India on Sunday that its top diplomat in the country is a person of interest in the 2023 assassination of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, and that police have uncovered evidence of an intensifying campaign against Canadian citizens by agents of the Indian government.
Are you arguing that the claim is unfounded? Or, conversely, are you suggesting that the claim is founded but irrelevant because the assassination and the "intensifying campaign" are justified?