I think that Saudi Arabia is developing. I mean i am not saying Saudi Arabia is perfect but its the most stabile country in whole of middle east. And although we consider it barbaric, their way of punishment. I still see some posibility of developing to something better.
For example. It has not been a victim of terrorist attacks. It does deal with crime even though its barbaric. There is no crazy brutal riots over something nonsensical etc.
But in other countries there might be more war, terrorism and that stuff etc. But i am pretty critical, when it comes to the support for waring in middle east over everything we don't like when it comes to a government. I mean i think that is the reason for destabilizating places and is the causes for making radical fundamentalists to their belief in islam. And join terror groups in the first place.
I think its more better to use diplomacy to reach to an agreement. Although the islamic laws, or terror groups can be the reason for destablizing a country due to too much theocracy and is the cause of the majority trying to do the same in the western world. Whether its due too the massive imigration(Which plays some part in it), but the cause of radicals can be incresive if its met with war, and gets a resentment towards the one warmongering them in the first place. But if a country has a stabile society for so long, and can develop. Then it has more of a chance to not get these radical views. And probably will be happy that way.
(Try to think the historical lesson of Germany, they tried democracy and gave them massive debt for the whole war, and due to poverty and starvation they became a fascist regime. Now they are pretty developed due to no harsh punishment as it was suggested after WW2)
So i think having good relations, even if its terrible is better than no relation at all.
For example. It has not been a victim of terrorist attacks. It does deal with crime even though its barbaric. There is no crazy brutal riots over something nonsensical etc.
But in other countries there might be more war, terrorism and that stuff etc. But i am pretty critical, when it comes to the support for waring in middle east over everything we don't like when it comes to a government. I mean i think that is the reason for destabilizating places and is the causes for making radical fundamentalists to their belief in islam. And join terror groups in the first place.
I think its more better to use diplomacy to reach to an agreement. Although the islamic laws, or terror groups can be the reason for destablizing a country due to too much theocracy and is the cause of the majority trying to do the same in the western world. Whether its due too the massive imigration(Which plays some part in it), but the cause of radicals can be incresive if its met with war, and gets a resentment towards the one warmongering them in the first place. But if a country has a stabile society for so long, and can develop. Then it has more of a chance to not get these radical views. And probably will be happy that way.
(Try to think the historical lesson of Germany, they tried democracy and gave them massive debt for the whole war, and due to poverty and starvation they became a fascist regime. Now they are pretty developed due to no harsh punishment as it was suggested after WW2)
So i think having good relations, even if its terrible is better than no relation at all.