Use Occam's Razor to Eliminate Particles and Slash Substance Metaphysics

[shunyadragon]

Hobson makes a series of deductions from facts that he substantiates to be facts. Obviously you haven't been able to make any deduction from any fact in order to answer the question asked in the OP, i.e., in order to show that there is some empirical reason to retain the idea that there are particles.

It remains a philosophical commentary, and no specific research cited reference to fact that would lead to falsified conclusions,

 

[Nous]

It remains a philosophical commentary, and no specific research cited reference to fact that would lead to falsified conclusions,

Again, Hobson makes a series of deductions from facts that he substantiates to be facts. Obviously you haven't been able to make even a single deduction from any fact in order to answer the question asked in the OP, i.e., in order to show that there is some empirical reason to retain the idea that there are particles.

 

[Yerda]

There are no fundamental particles, only quantum fields.

Thanks for another slice of chewy material.

I'll get back to you when I have time to read it carefully.

 

[Yerda]

@LegionOnomaMoi and @Polymath257

You're up.

 

[Nous]

Thanks for another slice of chewy material.

I'll get back to you when I have time to read it carefully.

You're welcomed. I'm looking forward to your conclusions.