• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Video: Debunking Every Anti-Communist Argument Ever

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
US industrialization couldn't have happened independently from Britain.
Nah, there was much independence. England
guarded its tech jealously, & wouldn't allow export
of their highest tech machine tools, & workers.
US machining technology evolved largely
independently, with the Windsor VT area
becoming the hi tech capital of the world by
1830 or so. In particular, standards relating
to interchangeable parts flourished here.

Of course, USA benefitted from the Watt high
pressure steam engine (Scottish) in particular.
But we improved that with the uniflow, Corliss
& similar advancements. Thereafter, internal
combustion engine tech came from primarily
from Germany (Otto) in the 1860s, & Diesel in
the early 1900s.

What's your source of info about the financing
of companies that manufactured engines,
machine tools, & other goods? In don't recall
reading about British financiers involved.
 
Last edited:

Kooky

Freedom from Sanity
Nah, there was much independence. England guarded its tech jealously, & wouldn't allow export of their highest tech machine tools, & workers.

Of course, USA benefitted from the Watt high pressure steam engine (Scottish) in particular.
It's amazing how you manage to contradict your own argument in just two paragraphs and don't even notice.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It's amazing how you manage to contradict your own argument in just two paragraphs and don't even notice.
For one unfamiliar with USA industrial
history, you've far too much confidence
in your ill considered musing about it.
 
Last edited:

Heyo

Veteran Member
Nah, there was much independence. England
guarded its tech jealously, & wouldn't allow export
of their highest tech machine tools, & workers.
And they wouldn't want to allow cheap tech of lesser quality being imported.
Thus they invented the "made in" quality seal to protect against lower quality products. "Made in Germany" used to be a diminutive. We ran with it and then flipped the bird to the English. Later we turned around and used "made in Japan" as a seal of low quality ...
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And they wouldn't want to allow cheap tech of lesser quality being imported.
The strict policy against exporting technology or workers
skilled in it was about preserving their lead in manufacturing
technology....not preventing imports.
BTW, I collect machine tools & steam engines spanning that period.
 
I wouldn't watch a forty-minute video to hear a person's viewpoint in the first place. That said, if I had absolutely nothing to do for that amount of time, the chapter headings alone are enough to tell me that the author is not taking the debate seriously.

I could watch some cake set instead.
 
Top