• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

WA To Ban Gas Vehicles

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
They are going to have to find an alternative to the electric batteries that catch fire and take 4 hours to put the fire out. Do you think they can do that before the 9 year deadline?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Dirty French. :D

So im told by brits ;-)

I edited my post, some cities already ban the most polluting vehicles.

Interestingly, when france announced the 2040 ban, boris followed only a couple of weeks later and 10 years sooner...
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
They are going to have to find an alternative to the electric batteries that catch fire and take 4 hours to put the fire out. Do you think they can do that before the 9 year deadline?
Cite?

And besides, even if there's a very very rare case where that happens, new battery tech is already in the lab. Li-Air batteries for one. And there are other alternatives Beyond lithium: alternative materials for the battery boom
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
They are going to have to find an alternative to the electric batteries that catch fire and take 4 hours to put the fire out. Do you think they can do that before the 9 year deadline?
Why? What's the evidence of the problem you refer to? How common is it, compared to fires in gasoline vehicles?
 

PureX

Veteran Member
They are going to have to find an alternative to the electric batteries that catch fire and take 4 hours to put the fire out. Do you think they can do that before the 9 year deadline?
The batteries we already have will work just fine for most of our needs. We rarely go more than 80 miles per trip. In fact, most of us rarely go more than 20. Right now most of us could be using electric cars with no noticeable change at all, but that we plug it in instead of filling it with gasoline.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Hmm, I see what you mean.

I found this article on the issue, which goes into some detail:
A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Suppression

This is specific to Li ion batteries, apparently. I read elsewhere that the use of salt water is proposed, as this will allow the energy in the damaged battery to discharge. But clearly some work between auto makers and fire departments is needed.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
They are going to have to find an alternative to the electric batteries that catch fire and take 4 hours to put the fire out. Do you think they can do that before the 9 year deadline?
Have you ever driven a Toyota Prius? Did you wear an asbestos suit?
 

ADigitalArtist

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Sounds like eco nazism.
Can you like... not use such egregiously hyperbolic language? Are you actually capable of having some nuanced criticism of anything?

Because I can think of some. I.e. right now fully electric vehicles don't work well for suburban apartment life. Not enough access to charging stations when you can't plug it into your garage. So are apartments going to be required to create charging stations or will apartment residents have to go find charging stations to spend hours at?
That's a valid criticism. 'Econazism!' Is just stupid.
 
Top