Father Heathen
Veteran Member
...except there is no punchline. This wasn't satire.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Next on the itinerary.
Awwww.....
So are you switching to Ultra Right beer?Well that brings us full circle!
Maybe those falling for this grift are the punchline.Currently selling at $20.00 a six pack. And there are already "reviews":
Ultra Right - Conservative Dad's - Untappd
Ultra Right by Conservative Dad's is a Lager - American Light which has a rating of 1.4 out of 5, with 102 ratings and reviews on Untappd.untappd.com
The punchline it that a 6 pack of this beer cost 20$ + 10$ for shipping (not available in stores). Thirty dollars for a six pack. Being a bigot is expensive.
...except there is no punchline. This wasn't satire.
They knew people would buy strictly out of "principle" or to make a statement, thus they can get away with a high price and low quality. In the commerical he didn't even bother describing the product itself.The punchline it that a 6 pack of this beer cost 20$ + 10$ for shipping (not available in stores). Thirty dollars for a six pack. Being a bigot is expensive.
...except there is no punchline. This wasn't satire.
Anheuser-Busch exec offers flat apology after Dylan Mulvaney’s Bud Light backlash
The top executive at Anheuser-Busch issued a shallower apology than day-old Bud Light on Friday as the beer giant reeled from backlash over its sponsorship deal with controversial transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.
“We never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people,” said Brendan Whitworth, CEO of Anheuser-Busch InBev.
“We have made it our mission to bring people together over a beer.”
Whitworth’s statement made no mention of the sponsorship deal with Mulvaney – which has led to calls for a boycott of the country’s largest beer company.
He also didn’t address reports that executives were being kept in the dark about Mulvaney’s launch.
Instead, Whitworth said he was “focused on building and protecting our remarkable history and heritage.”
“Moving forward, I will continue to work tirelessly to bring great beers to consumers across our nation,” said Whitworth, a Harvard Business School graduate who served in the Marines and was a CIA officer.
The $132 billion beer company has seen its market value plummet by some $5 billion since the campaign was launched April 1.
Why would they owe anyone an apology?Anheuser-Busch exec offers flat apology after Dylan Mulvaney’s Bud Light backlash
The top executive at Anheuser-Busch issued a shallower apology than day-old Bud Light on Friday as the beer giant reeled from backlash over its sponsorship deal with controversial transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney.
“We never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people,” said Brendan Whitworth, CEO of Anheuser-Busch InBev.
“We have made it our mission to bring people together over a beer.”
Whitworth’s statement made no mention of the sponsorship deal with Mulvaney – which has led to calls for a boycott of the country’s largest beer company.
He also didn’t address reports that executives were being kept in the dark about Mulvaney’s launch.
Instead, Whitworth said he was “focused on building and protecting our remarkable history and heritage.”
“Moving forward, I will continue to work tirelessly to bring great beers to consumers across our nation,” said Whitworth, a Harvard Business School graduate who served in the Marines and was a CIA officer.
The $132 billion beer company has seen its market value plummet by some $5 billion since the campaign was launched April 1.
The transgendered (and drag queens) are targets of the current moral panic and witch hunt. So displaying any amount of respect or human decency toward them = "woke" = satanic, etc.Wait... I hadn't heard of Dylan Mulvaney before. I looked her up and found nothing controversial; only that she's trans and apparently getting backlash from some because of featuring in a partnership with a beer company. Am I missing something?
Why on earth would merely partnering with a trans celebrity warrant any backlash, let alone a boycott? Is the implication here that trans celebrities should be shunned by companies just for being trans?
Why would they owe anyone an apology?
"Sorry for triggering you, snowflakes."My first guess is..... $5 billion drop in two weeks.
"The $132 billion beer company has seen its market value plummet by some $5 billion since the campaign was launched April 1."
My first guess is..... $5 billion drop in two weeks.
"The $132 billion beer company has seen its market value plummet by some $5 billion since the campaign was launched April 1."
While the Mulvaney controversy has plausibly influenced the valuation, in the context of heavy criticism and threats of boycotts among what is considered its traditional consumer base in the U.S., other factors were likely at play, too.
Mulvaney may have been the catalyst for some investors to rethink and take into consideration a number of pre-existing reasons for them to sell, as noted by analysts.
For example, Anheuser-Busch's share price has been increasing significantly since mid-March, rising by around 18 percent between then and the end of the month. The recent decrease in value could be caused by profit-taking traders who think the share price is near its peak.