KBC1963
Active Member
I totally respect that. I was referring more to your criticism of Buddha and stuff. I doen't make sense to me that you would try and prove Buddha as a false prophet using your own holy book. The only people that the bible is going to convince are the ones who already believe in it, so that's circular reasoning
I know, but to give you a clearer understanding of what I was trying to get across I will say it this way, the bible and the GOD of that book are much more proveable than any other religion on earth so by going with that as a basis for judgement of other religions I have more support than another religion does when they say the bible is false.
Now I do agree that the reasoning is circular but the odds I am wrong as compared to other religions is almost not possible when you compare the proveable things of the bible against any other religious book.
At some point each of us chooses a foundation of belief and if it was all easily proveable then it wouldnt be a belief per se but rather common knowledge. I have taken a stand with my beliefs because I have looked at all the possibilities for each religion and found them all short except for the bible but in any case I don't know it all and I am willing to hear any possibilities that I may not have thought of, so I say my thoughts and await for the counter argument and see how my statement measures up to the thoughts of the others and be it circular or not my foundation came after many years of research into each religion and I now reason according to what the bible says.
So I await your ideas and will compare their merit and who knows you may be an einstien under cover but whatever you may be I will give the time to consider what you say and not just shoot it down without checking the points.