• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was America ever great?

Palehorse

Active Member
I think states individual rights are essential and ought to be preserved. It's a major reason why I'm so against unified blanket socialism.

Unified blanket socialism could also be called Judaic Socialism. A democratic socialism would treat everyone and every state as individuals.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I think states individual rights are essential and ought to be preserved. It's a major reason why I'm so against unified blanket socialism.
"State's rights" is usually just an excuse for backwards states to discriminate against various groups. It always struck me as stupid that you could go from one state to another and lose rights and liberties, and vice versa.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
"State's rights" is usually just an excuse for backwards states to discriminate against various groups. It always struck me as stupid that you could go from one state to another and lose rights and liberties, and vice versa.
In fact, I challenge anyone to find me an example where "state's rights" was used as an argument for something that wasn't about restricting the rights to some minority or another. And no, removing ability right to legally discriminate against someone doesn't count.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
"State's rights" is usually just an excuse for backwards states to discriminate against various groups. It always struck me as stupid that you could go from one state to another and lose rights and liberties, and vice versa.
I hear where your coming from, yet when you really think about it, there's always an option available to move to a state more suited to your liking. If federalism goes down a universal socialised path, people who may not appreciate things arguably will have no place to run or escape to if states lose their automony. That would be a bad road imo.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
In fact, I challenge anyone to find me an example where "state's rights" was used as an argument for something that wasn't about restricting the rights to some minority or another. And no, removing ability right to legally discriminate against someone doesn't count.
I see no fed constutional authority to ban marijuana,
but when states have legalized it, the fed spank's users & makers.
Lately, this has become a states' rights issue.
The Constitution's 10th Amendment is still the law of the land.

Edit:
As a Libertarian, this has long mattered to me (non-smoker, btw).
And now I have a MJ testing lab as a tenant.
Thorny legal issues there.
**** the fed!

Geeze, did I really say that?
 
Last edited:

gnomon

Well-Known Member
We hear so much banter and rhetoric about making America great again as a country, but tell me, based on past to present throughout the history of the country, was there really ever any period of "greatness" that can be pointed out as an example?

What are we talking about with "greatness" and what age old nonsense are we applying to the concept with many people applying the age old concept in a culturally specific manner to deride one culture over another never mind that historically..........they are pretty much all the same.

I'm really interested........what is this definition of greatness subjectively determined to provide a rank of greatness of one culture over another?
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
I hear where your coming from, yet when you really think about it, there's always an option available to move to a state more suited to your liking. If federalism goes down a universal socialised path, people who may not appreciate things arguably will have no place to run or escape to if states lose their automony. That would be a bad road imo.
So long as you have either a job which would allow you to live in one state while working in another, or you have enough saved up income for the 3-4 months or however long it generally takes to move to a new place and find a new job.

Y'know, so long as you are always capable of doing those things, sure, that's theorectically an option.

I see no fed constutional authority to ban marijuana,
but when states have legalized it, the fed spank's users & makers.
Lately, this has become a states' rights issue.
The Constitution's 10th Amendment is still the law of the land.

Edit:
As a Libertarian, this has long mattered to me (non-smoker, btw).
And now I have a MJ testing lab as a tenant.
Thorny legal issues there.
**** the fed!

Geeze, did I really say that?
But no one is using state's rights as the argument for it.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Here for the ride
Premium Member
I hear where your coming from, yet when you really think about it, there's always an option available to move to a state more suited to your liking. If federalism goes down a universal socialised path, people who may not appreciate things arguably will have no place to run or escape to if states lose their automony. That would be a bad road imo.
America really needs to change its name from the "United States" since so many Americans want to act like it's a bunch of different countries and "hating the fed" is always popular. :rolleyes:
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
Are you sure?
Done a search?
I have, actually. I won't pretend it was an exhaustive search, I did not scour the globe or what not, but I gave it an hour and could not find any examples of someone basing the argument of marijuana legalization on the notion of states' rights or such.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
I have, actually. I won't pretend it was an exhaustive search, I did not scour the globe or what not, but I gave it an hour and could not find any examples of someone basing the argument of marijuana legalization on the notion of states' rights or such.

In Colorado, I never heard of that argument during the whole time the issue was being debated here.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
:rolleyes::rolleyes: My puter dosent seem to rid of these things. Its like tribbles or something. =0)


America really needs to change its name from the "United States" since so many Americans want to act like it's a bunch of different countries and "hating the fed" is always popular. :rolleyes:

I not too sure the federal government was orginally designed to operate in the manner as it's doing now.

Did you know the federal government was first created by the states?

...the Constitution, which went into operation in 1789 when the first Congress convened and George Washington took the oath of office as president. The government is called federal because it was formed by a compact (the Constitution) among 13 political units (the states). These states agreed to give up part of their independence, or sovereignty, in order to form a central authority and submit themselves to it. Thus, what was essentially a group of 13 separate countries under the Articles of Confederation united to form one nation under the Constitution.


http://history-world.org/united_states_government.htm

The problem is that an increasing centralized govt seems to be stripping and chipping away more and more states rights away as each year passes by as it gets bigger and bigger and more bloated.
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
My response to that rhetoric is confusion, because it seems pretty great to me right now, on the whole. :shrug:

But I'm also one of those apparently rare people that knows how to count their blessings.

Yeah, it's called the grass is not always greener on the other side. But in my case, it was a lot greener since I immigrated here.

Count your blessings, indeed.

I think it's a great country, but I can see how it was greater in WWII. Definitely see the arguments with that.

But of course, I wouldn't have wanted to be in America during the 1800s given I'm not Caucasian.
 
Top