• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was George H.W. Bush a good president?

Dell

Asteroid insurance?
All presidents have faults.. Republicans and Democrats are quick to devalue the ones not in their party. The funny thing about the gulf wars are how politicians deny their part in them. I remember the majority of both Republican and Democrats supporting military action in Iraq after 9-11. W Bush got stuck with 9-11, terrorism, bad forgien intelligence and advisors. Who knows if he would have got US involved in Iraq if 9-11 hadn't of happened. Clinton probably would have done the same if dealt the same during his presidency.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No, he was not. I would spit on his grave, if given the chance.
If I were into hating presidents, I'd be inclined to sprinkle a vintage
single malt scotch over his grave....after filter'n it thru me kidneys first.

But back to seriousness, I think my vast differences with
old GHWB can be grokked by hearing his favorite hymn....
For him war seemed to be this noble & virtuous endeavor.
For me, it's a hideous & destructive evil which which is a
last resort to survive.
 
Last edited:

wandering peacefully

Which way to the woods?
I liked Ronald Reagan for helping end the Cold War and for the longest economic boom which he enhanced by cutting taxes and lowering both interest rates and inflation.

I liked Bill Clinton for balancing the budget and his foreign policy.

Is it fair to blame Bush Senior for the deficits under Reagan when those deficits were a necessity? I can't blame Bush for a recession but Clinton did a good job after him. So was Bush a good president?

Have any of them been "good" really? Every single one of them have done stupid things. I have to always view the current POTUS as the least of the two evils. Most of the time it works out that way. Not this time of course. But Bush? I thought he was the one that started the entire Middle East debacle? I'm must just be out of it. I though Bush 1 & 2 sucked. But he'll finally be in the ground today so we can get on with it. A national day (more like a week)of mourning? I sometimes think we are a ridiculous country. I'm not sure what great thing Bush did to make us a better country. There obviously must be something the way people have been reacting. Like he was the greatest man ever.
 

wandering peacefully

Which way to the woods?
I liked Ronald Reagan for helping end the Cold War and for the longest economic boom which he enhanced by cutting taxes and lowering both interest rates and inflation.

I liked Bill Clinton for balancing the budget and his foreign policy.

Is it fair to blame Bush Senior for the deficits under Reagan when those deficits were a necessity? I can't blame Bush for a recession but Clinton did a good job after him. So was Bush a good president?

Well to be fair, my memory forgot a few things that were most likely good. So he wasn't all bad. But I think this elevation to Saint Bush is a little overdone.


He began an effort to persuade the Democratic controlled Congress to act on the budget; with Republicans believing that the best way was to cut government spending, and Democrats convinced that the only way would be to raise taxes, Bush faced problems when it came to consensus building.[
During his eight-year tenure as Vice President, Bush headed task forces on deregulation and the war on drugs.By 1992, interest and inflation rates were the lowest in years, but by midyear the unemployment rate reached 7.8%, the highest since 1984. In September 1992, the Census Bureau reported that 14.2% of all Americans lived in poverty.During his presidency, Bush signed a number of major bills into law, including the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; this was one of the most pro-civil rights bills in decades. He was also the only president to successfully veto a civil rights act, having vetoed the job-discrimination protection Civil Rights Act of 1990.[119] Bush feared racial quotas would be imposed, but later approved the watered-down Civil Rights Act of 1991.[120]He worked to increase federal spending for education, childcare, and advanced technology research. He also signed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act which provides monetary compensation of people who had contracted cancer and a number of other specified diseases as a direct result of their exposure to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing undertaken by the United States during the Cold War, or their exposure to high levels of radon while doing uranium mining. In dealing with the environment, Bush reauthorized the Clean Air Act, requiring cleaner burning fuels. He quarreled with Congress over an eventually signed bill to aid police in capturing criminals, and signed into law a measure to improve the nation's highway system.[29] Bush signed the Immigration Act of 1990,[121] which led to a 40 percent increase in legal immigration to the United States.[122]

Bush became a life member of the National Rifle Association early in 1988 and had campaigned as a "pro-gun" candidate with the NRA's endorsement.[123] In March 1989, he placed a temporary ban on the import of certain semiautomatic rifles.[124] This action cost him endorsement from the NRA in 1992. Bush publicly resigned his life membership in the organization after receiving a form letter from the NRA depicting agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms as "jack-booted thugs." He called the NRA letter a "vicious slander on good people."

George H. W. Bush - Wikipedia
 

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
George H.W. Bush demonstrated strong leadership in the wake of the Gulf War, but he was weak on economic policies; I never forgave him for breaking his promise not to agree with raising taxes.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
George H.W. Bush demonstrated strong leadership in the wake of the Gulf War, but he was weak on economic policies; I never forgave him for breaking his promise not to agree with raising taxes.
Strong leadership is a double edged sword.
Agree with the agenda, & it's wonderful.
Disagree, & it can be heinous.
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
He raised taxes, started a war, & promoted Americastan as policeman of the world.
It just shows to go ya that evil can be a paragon of civility.
(He said he'd start the war even if Congress opposed it.)


I thought that was the second Bush who started 911 war.
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
I will shock your hairs off here. Though I did not agree with the wars that were started by either Bush I would much rather have either one of them as President right now then Trump! They were way better then Trump sorry.
 

ronki23

Well-Known Member
Both Bushes started wars.
The 2nd (#43) one started 2 of'm.
Although the 1st one (#41) might've been
somewhat culpable for the Iraq-Iran war too.

Have any of them been "good" really? Every single one of them have done stupid things. I have to always view the current POTUS as the least of the two evils. Most of the time it works out that way. Not this time of course. But Bush? I thought he was the one that started the entire Middle East debacle? I'm must just be out of it. I though Bush 1 & 2 sucked. But he'll finally be in the ground today so we can get on with it. A national day (more like a week)of mourning? I sometimes think we are a ridiculous country. I'm not sure what great thing Bush did to make us a better country. There obviously must be something the way people have been reacting. Like he was the greatest man ever.

George H.W. Bush demonstrated strong leadership in the wake of the Gulf War, but he was weak on economic policies; I never forgave him for breaking his promise not to agree with raising taxes.

Reagan was the one who cut taxes; Bush only increased them to try and balance the budget. Clinton cut both spending and taxes.

People say Clinton didn't really balance the budget and even if he did it was bad for the economy.

No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget

The Untold Story Of How Clinton's Budget Destroyed The American Economy

Did Bill Clinton's Budgets Really Destroy the American Economy?


Also Saddam invaded Kuwait, it was our duty to help our ally. He even killed over 10,000 Kurds
 

Riders

Well-Known Member
Reagan was the one who cut taxes; Bush only increased them to try and balance the budget. Clinton cut both spending and taxes.

People say Clinton didn't really balance the budget and even if he did it was bad for the economy.

No, Bill Clinton Didn't Balance the Budget

The Untold Story Of How Clinton's Budget Destroyed The American Economy

Did Bill Clinton's Budgets Really Destroy the American Economy?


Also Saddam invaded Kuwait, it was our duty to help our ally. He even killed over 10,000 Kurds


Well why don't you tell Bush Jr to come back to work then? All we need to do is overthrow TRUMP! Sorry if only it could happen.
 

Salvador

RF's Swedenborgian
I will shock your hairs off here. Though I did not agree with the wars that were started by either Bush I would much rather have either one of them as President right now then Trump! They were way better then Trump sorry.

Tax reform under Trump means you'll likely be able to do your tax return early next year on a post card ...When either Bush was president, tax filing wasn't this easy. Remember to be more appreciative of Trump this year when you pay less taxes and it's way easier to file your tax return than ever before. ....:)

_98593219_gettyimages-869460734.jpg
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Reagan was the one who cut taxes; Bush only increased them to try and balance the budget. Clinton cut both spending and taxes.
Note that Reagan's tax cuts were also accompanied by some increases,
eg, in the form of reducing depreciation deductions. Such things are
never so simple as entirely this or that. Tis just as Trump's "tax cuts"
included some increases too. And revenue has actually increased as a result.
(Although he also increased spending, thereby increasing the deficit.)

Clinton cut taxes?
How so?
People say Clinton didn't really balance the budget and even if he did it was bad for the economy.
Good or bad for the economy is a matter of opinion, particularly when looking at
long term vs short term effects.
There are many ways to skin a cat.
Bush's approach was one of the spendier ones.
 
Last edited:
Top