sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Jesus came to die on a cross and rise on the third day in order to redeem mankind. Everything else was secondary.Did Jesus intend to restore Judaism, reform Judaism, or found a revolutionary new religion?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jesus came to die on a cross and rise on the third day in order to redeem mankind. Everything else was secondary.Did Jesus intend to restore Judaism, reform Judaism, or found a revolutionary new religion?
Havelock was wrong."Had there ben a lunatic assylum in the suburbs of Jerusalem, Jesus Christ would infallibly have been shut up in it at the outset of his public career."
Havelock Ellis
"Had there ben a lunatic assylum in the suburbs of Jerusalem, Jesus Christ would infallibly have been shut up in it at the outset of his public career."
Havelock Ellis
"The sad part is he had to die at our hands for us to find out how stupid we are"
I don't think god needed to die for us to know how stupid we are.
. Then again, we killed god, whether by our hands or our philosophy.
Lao Tzu said in the Tao Te Ching; "Why is the Ocean the king of all streams? Because it lies lower then they." This is the the way of the Tao. And the way of God. Do not mistake pure humility for weakness.Man, what a wimpish god.
Lao Tzu said in the Tao Te Ching; "Why is the Ocean the king of all streams? Because it lies lower then they." This is the the way of the Tao. And the way of God. Do not mistake pure humility for weakness.
Never do.Do not mistake fiction for fact.
He does not follow in your foot steps.Do not mistake fiction for fact.
He does not follow in your foot steps.
On this we disagree... you are one of the most proselytizing atheists I have known! Somehow you think you have a lock on the truth and logic where all others have failed. It shouldn't take much of a logician to see the multiple fallacies inherent in your approach.I'm not the one pushing fiction on this forum, or on TV 24/7.
On this we disagree... you are one of the most proselytizing atheists I have known! Somehow you think you have a lock on the truth and logic where all others have failed. It shouldn't take much of a logician to see the multiple fallacies inherent in your approach.
Then you must not know many atheists. I really couldn't care less what you or anyone else believes, but I do care when fiction is paraded as fact. The fact that you take debates personally is not my problem.