• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Was Jesus actually crucified?

rsd

ACBSP77
I recently discovered a Catholic history dating back to around 1600 that strongly suggest to me that Jesus Christ was never even in the hands of his Roman tormentors, what to speak of being crucified. I wonder if this is something that anyone would even be interested in discussing.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
I recently discovered a Catholic history dating back to around 1600 that strongly suggest to me that Jesus Christ was never even in the hands of his Roman tormentors, what to speak of being crucified. I wonder if this is something that anyone would even be interested in discussing.

Did you name it after yourself?

I can't imagine why you with think that a 17th century "Catholic history" would lead you to question whether or not Jesus was crucified approximately 1600 years earlier.... when almost every other Christian document indicates otherwise.
 

rsd

ACBSP77
Did you name it after yourself?

I can't imagine why you with think that a 17th century "Catholic history" would lead you to question whether or not Jesus was crucified approximately 1600 years earlier.... when almost every other Christian document indicates otherwise.

Please help me out. Name what after myself? As far as my topic, putting aside your thoughtful comment for the sake of moving forward, this is why I first asked if anyone even cared to look into this.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
Please help me out. Name what after myself? As far as my topic, putting aside your thoughtful comment for the sake of moving forward, this is why I first asked if anyone even cared to look into this.

The "Catholic history" that you discovered. If you discover it, you get to name it whatever you want, like discovering a star or something.

Secondly, since you didn't provide the name of the document (if you didn't discover it), asking us if we want to discuss it is a rather moot point.

There's nothing to discuss, other than openly telling everyone that it is irrelevant (17th century document authoritatively questioning a first century event).

Now, I'd be interested in knowing the actual date and content of the document, but I don't know where to start because I have no idea what it is that you think you're looking at.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
John Dominic Crossan is definitely newer than the 17th century, and even he buys into the crucifixion.
 

rsd

ACBSP77
The "Catholic history" that you discovered. If you discover it, you get to name it whatever you want, like discovering a star or something.

Secondly, since you didn't provide the name of the document (if you didn't discover it), asking us if we want to discuss it is a rather moot point.

There's nothing to discuss, other than openly telling everyone that it is irrelevant (17th century document authoritatively questioning a first century event).

Now, I'd be interested in knowing the actual date and content of the document, but I don't know where to start because I have no idea what it is that you think you're looking at.

You come across a bit rude and sarcastic. You say there is nothing to discusss. I guess I am pretty shallow to even suggest the opposite. However, when 50 Jumano Indians from Texas arrived at a Spainish Mission around 1625, their arrival created quite a stir amoung the priest. As far as missionary work in Texas, Spain was the only country involved. And from what they could gather from the indians, they came from an area in Texas untouched by Spainish priest. But what was most curious was that all the indians carried with them small crosses. They were even requesting to be baptized with water. Immediately this generated all kinds of discussion amongst the priests at the mission. What was even more astounding, was that several of the chiefs had rosary beads.

No, when I first came across this information, I didn't stake any fame to it. I simply spent around $50.00 and ordered more detailed information. At the time I was in San Angelo, Texas simply visiting my wife's mother. San Angelo is where the Jumano Indias were from - the capital of their nation, so to speak.

The rosary-bead connection is pretty interesting.
 

rsd

ACBSP77
Its typical of people who request evidence.

I hope you follow my postings. Of course, many "stories" that date back 4-500 years can read as "myth." But the rosaries beads that the Indian Chiefs had on their possession actually ended up being an artifact. The main Spanish investigator, Fr. Benavides - was given one of the rosary beads by a chief. The Father requested that the rosary be buried with him when he died. But because he died on a ship later on in is life, I am not sure what kind of burial he actually had. Either way, I read that he wanted the rosary that the chief gave him to go to the grave with him. I'll explain more what I mean by "artifact."
 

rsd

ACBSP77
Of course you do. But it's thin, worthless gruel you're dishing out -- thin enough, in fact, to be transparent.

Actually I was addressing another memeber of this forum. Worthless gruel? Sorry. I'm not putting my thoughts down very well.

Anyhow, after the 50 indians had settled down, the chiefs were invited into the convent so that the priests could make sense out of the odd circumstances surrounding the arrival of the indians - that they had crosses, rosaries, and knew about baptism by water and other knowledge of Christian doctrine.

Upon entering the convent, the indians became very excited and began pointing at an oil painting that was hanging on the wall. It was a picture of a famous Spainish nun, Mother Luisa de Carrion. You see, the priest wanted to know where they got their rosaries from and where they got all their crosses. When the Indians saw the painting, all at once they started pointing at it and said, "a woman - like her - but young, not old." The indians told the priest that a young woman who was dressed exactly like her had given them the rosary beads and had taught them how to make their crosses. That just didn't add up. That would be impossible. But the indians insisted. Looking at the picture of Mother Lusia, Father Benevides found a clue in the way she was dressed.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
I recently discovered a Catholic history dating back to around 1600 that strongly suggest to me that Jesus Christ was never even in the hands of his Roman tormentors, what to speak of being crucified. I wonder if this is something that anyone would even be interested in discussing.

What book or source do you speak of?
 

fallingblood

Agnostic Theist
I hope you follow my postings. Of course, many "stories" that date back 4-500 years can read as "myth." But the rosaries beads that the Indian Chiefs had on their possession actually ended up being an artifact. The main Spanish investigator, Fr. Benavides - was given one of the rosary beads by a chief. The Father requested that the rosary be buried with him when he died. But because he died on a ship later on in is life, I am not sure what kind of burial he actually had. Either way, I read that he wanted the rosary that the chief gave him to go to the grave with him. I'll explain more what I mean by "artifact."
What is the source to these stories? Can you provide the name of a site, a book, movie, etc?
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
You come across a bit rude and sarcastic. You say there is nothing to discusss. I guess I am pretty shallow to even suggest the opposite. However, when 50 Jumano Indians from Texas arrived at a Spainish Mission around 1625, their arrival created quite a stir amoung the priest. As far as missionary work in Texas, Spain was the only country involved. And from what they could gather from the indians, they came from an area in Texas untouched by Spainish priest. But what was most curious was that all the indians carried with them small crosses. They were even requesting to be baptized with water. Immediately this generated all kinds of discussion amongst the priests at the mission. What was even more astounding, was that several of the chiefs had rosary beads.

No, when I first came across this information, I didn't stake any fame to it. I simply spent around $50.00 and ordered more detailed information. At the time I was in San Angelo, Texas simply visiting my wife's mother. San Angelo is where the Jumano Indias were from - the capital of their nation, so to speak.

The rosary-bead connection is pretty interesting.

Occasionally I do wonder what it would be like to be insane.
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
You come across a bit rude and sarcastic. You say there is nothing to discusss. I guess I am pretty shallow to even suggest the opposite. However, when 50 Jumano Indians from Texas arrived at a Spainish Mission around 1625...

Yes, there's nothing to discuss. At least until you provide the details regarding your source so we can read it too. Then we can discuss it. Until then, we just have to put up with cold air.

By the way, I see the 1625 date. Is that the source from the 1600s that you reference in your first post?? A story about American Indians from Texas?

Well cut my legs off and call me shorty.
 

rsd

ACBSP77
I had first heard about this maybe way back in the early 90s when I didn't have Google and didn't look into it. Then when I was visiting my mother-in-law, on the front page of the San Angelo newspaper was a large picture of a nun and subsequently, for the first time I read my first account of this remarkable nun. In the newspaper several books were mentioned. One is a Dan Brown kind of book with a story line that mentions this same nun off and on. But it also mentioned another book and it is, "Maria of Agreda: Mystical Lady in Blue" by Marilyn Fedewa. This book is written on a college level by a college professor.

But as you probably know, Spanish nuns were never allowed to leave their convents in Spain, what to speak of traveling to New Spain (Mexico, America). So when the Jumano indians pointed at a painting of a nun and said that a young nun was teaching them, that was impossible. Or, was there a renegade nun or a woman impersonating a nun? Had the indians kidnapped a white woman and that was the person teaching the indians. Or, even perhaps Coronado, who had traveled thru parts of Texas 100 years earlier...did he have a white woman with him. Did she give birth and was it her child that the indians were talking about. But Coronado had never mentioned this in his records. But the blue cape that Mother luisa was wearing in the painting gave Fr. Benevides a clue. He wrote back to Spain and asked that someone visit the convents located in Northern Spain where the only nuns in Spain dressed in that color cape. That letter took almost a year to reach the church officials that Benevides had addressed it to.
 
Top