Everyone wants to force Jesus into their own box.
But not you, of course. You're not part of "everyone".
The above is an example of someone who is probably "spiritual not religious" trying to make Jesus into their own image.
And you are immune to this...
In fact, what scholars tell us is that Jesus practiced second temple Judaism. I'll go with what the experts say.
Will you now? The experts which agree with you?
The point being, the inclusiveness of Jesus' teaching certainly to me, as well as many experts I find value in, see Jesus as teaching that the kingdom of God is not found in a religion or a temple, but is open to all. What do you think this is saying?
Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”
Now to me, that sounds like he is pointing to the "spiritual but not religious", a faith that transcends religious affiliations. But to fundamentalists and other religious legalists, they see some other meaning perhaps, such as they will need to find the right restored church in New York, or that this will be in the afterlife but certainly not in this lifetime, or some other way to make it fit with their views of Jesus. How do you read that to make it fit your views?