Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Present your arguments in a Scriptural format, in this thread, for or against
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Point of order, Disciple. Why start a scriptural debate in the General Religious Debates forum and not the Scriptural Debates forum?
I think its worth noting that the Hebrew scriptures, written prior to the NT do not mention Jesus at all. The NT utilizes the Hebrew scripture to support the divinity and messiah-status of Jesus. The writers and editors of the NT take Hebrew prophecies and glue them on Jesus.Present your arguments in a Scriptural format, in this thread, for or against
I think its worth noting that the Hebrew scriptures, written prior to the NT do not mention Jesus at all. The NT utilizes the Hebrew scripture to support the divinity and messiah-status of Jesus. The writers and editors of the NT take Hebrew prophecies and glue them on Jesus.
But I'll try to address the OP from the NT itself.
Many of the titles and epithet of Jesus should be viewed in light of the context of the Greco-Roman world.
For example, the gospels refer to Jesus by titles and deeds which reflect Jesus' superiority in relation to Imperial Roman religion and Greek paganism.
Jesus becomes the Son of God to show that he is greater than the emperor, who is also the Son of God. Jesus turns water into wine, to show that he is greater than Dionysus the pagan god of wine. And so on and so forth.
While there is evidently an agenda to present Jesus as an exclusive divinity, it's hard to ignore the background for the creation of such early Christian ideologies.
These were times in which emperors became sons of chief gods, and often elevated in an apotheosis to divine status. It's not surprising that early Christians wished to elevate Jesus above the men made gods of their time.
Yeah, it does to me.Does this necessarily mean to you that Jesus wasn't the Messiah? It doesn't to me
He's not in my scripture ... sorry.Present your arguments in a Scriptural format, in this thread, for or against
He's not in my scripture ... sorry.
Present your arguments in a Scriptural format, in this thread, for or against
Sparked from his martyred death at passover with thousands and thousands of possible witnesses, oral traditions of what happened and why were generated and originated with this event.
These witnesses were wide and varied, some believed he was the Messiah, some did not.
Your question is almost a matter of "when" and "who" more so then "if".
For some, he had failed with death, and was a failed Messiah.
For others, he had bypassed death alltogether and was ressurected to fulfill OT prophecy and become "the one" Messiah.
Jesus was the Messiah based on
1. Miracles he performed
2. Fulfillment of Messianic prophecies connected with him
3. Timing of his arrival exactly according to Daniels prophecy of the '70 weeks'
4. Miraculous nature of his birth
5. His Resurrection
6. His prophecies concerning the end of the Jewish temple system and the situation in the world during the last days.
7. And Gods own declaration as heard by 3 witnesses on the night before he died...and as witnessed by John the Baptist when he saw holy spirit descend upon Jesus.