paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Jonah was not dead in the belly of the fish; rather, the 3 days spent in the belly of the fish represent death in the form of the new moon.
I don't get you exactly. Please elaborate.
Regards
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Jonah was not dead in the belly of the fish; rather, the 3 days spent in the belly of the fish represent death in the form of the new moon.
More Americans are moving toward an interpretation of the Bible as a book of fables, history, and moral precepts. ...Attempts at demythologizing the Bible that have been ongoing in the academy for years seem to be moving more and more from the classroom to the pews.... As recently as 1963, two persons in three viewed the Bible as the actual word of God, to be taken literally, word for word. Today, only one person in three still holds to that interpretation (1999, p. 36).
I don't think so either.I dont think so.
The story doesn't say it's a whale, it says it was a big fish. We can think of it in more than one way:
1. He was actually swallowed by a big fish and vomitted on the shore 3 days later.
2. Being swallowed was an allegorical element meaning he was spiritually dead.
3. The whole story was an allegory.
Unless of course a Creator exists who can mess with the natural laws and make them yield to his command. In that case the familiar story of Jonah in the belly of the fish could serve as a description of Jesus in the tomb. Jonah was alive but confined to that fish for three days but with Jesus, even though was not alive, the illustrative value of Jonah's experience taught the Jews something about his death.....indicating that he was confined in the tomb and did not go anywhere for the entire time he was in there.100% mythology with no historical core at all in reality.
Unless of course a Creator exists who can mess with the natural laws and make them yield to his command. In that case the familiar story of Jonah in the belly of the fish could serve as a description of Jesus in the tomb. Jonah was alive but confined to that fish for three days but with Jesus, even though was not alive, the illustrative value of Jonah's experience taught the Jews something about his death.....indicating that he was confined in the tomb and did not go anywhere for the entire time he was in there.
The truthfulness of the Bible and whether or not a Creator exists who can do what we might describe as 'the impossible', does not depend upon your belief or disbelief in him. You knew that of course.
The duration of three days in the belly of the fish was mentioned by Torah in the book of Jonah.
Gospels copied it from Torah.
It neither proves that Jonah was alive for three days in the belly of the fish nor proves that Jesus was for three days in the tomb.
Regards
Unless of course a Creator exists who can mess with the natural laws and make them yield to his command.
The truthfulness of the Bible
a Creator exists
does not depend upon your belief
Of course. Why else would Jesus use it as a reference?
Define "proves"? How much of the Bible is accepted because of "proof" and how much is accepted because of faith"? Which does God require? (Heb 11:6)
If the scriptures say that Jonah was in the belly of the fish and survived, then we take that on faith because he lived to write about it and even included his own defiance and the tantrum he threw over the bottle gourd plant.
If Jesus used Jonah's example as a real life event, then who are we to question it? Jonah was confined in the belly of the fish, just as Jesus was confined in his tomb for three days. How can anyone ask for "proof" of such things?
Everything written in the Bible is for our education....not in the way man views education but in how God views it. Whereas academia demands proof, we operate by faith, even if we look like fools to the intellectuals. (1 Cor 1:26-29)
we take that on faith
If one is a Christian, then Jesus lays the foundation for our faith...he is our prophet, the one through whom God spoke. Muslims accept him as a prophet too, but most Jews still reject him.Faith must be based on reason otherwise it is blind-faith. Jesus had got nothing to do with such faith.
Regards
Is that what he said, "I have nothing to do with blind faith"? Got a chapter and verse for this one? Thanks.Faith must be based on reason otherwise it is blind-faith. Jesus had got nothing to do with such faith.
Regards
Is that what he said, "I have nothing to do with blind faith"? Got a chapter and verse for this one? Thanks.
If one is a Christian, then Jesus lays the foundation for our faith...he is our prophet, the one through whom God spoke. Muslims accept him as a prophet too, but most Jews still reject him.
If faith were purely based on reason then everyone's faith would be different, based on their own reasoning.....this is not what God's worshippers are told to do, either in ancient Israel, Islam or in Christianity. We all accept the writings of Holy Scripture as a basis for our beliefs, but we also rely on humans to interpret scripture for us. No one is free to form their own religion based upon what they choose to believe....and yet what do we see in the world? Just that, especially so in Christianity, though Judaism and Islam still have their sectarian differences. So we are left with not only "what" to believe but "who".
To Christians, the apostle Paul wrote....
"11 For the Scripture says: None that rests his faith on him will be disappointed. 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for there is the same Lord over all, who is rich to all those calling upon him. 13 For everyone who calls on the name of Jehovah will be saved. 14 However, how will they call on him in whom they have not put faith? How, in turn, will they put faith in him of whom they have not heard? How, in turn, will they hear without someone to preach? 15 How, in turn, will they preach unless they have been sent forth? Just as it is written: How comely are the feet of those who declare good news of good things!
16 Nevertheless, they did not all obey the good news. For Isaiah says: Jehovah, who put faith in the thing heard from us? 17 So faith follows the thing heard. In turn the thing heard is through the word about Christ. 18 Nevertheless I ask, They did not fail to hear, did they? Why, in fact, into all the earth their sound went out, and to the extremities of the inhabited earth their utterances. (Rom 10:11-18)
So again, in all the world Christ has sent his disciples out to declare the "good news" about his kingdom........but who are listening? (Matt 24:14; 36-39)
This is how I discern who today are doing the will of the Father.....they are the ones who are actively preaching "in all the inhabited earth." They are not just giving lip service to the kingdom, but are active advocates and preachers about it. They actually know what the Kingdom of God is. :yes:
If faith were purely based on reason then everyone's faith would be different, based on their own reasoning.
I dont think so.
Your thoughts, please.
Everybody is welcome believing in a religion or not.
Regards
Whale's belly is full of HCL. It's impossible to live in there for three days, unless Jonah wears something like an Iron Man suit of course.