Aqualung
Tasty
Uuhhh. No?michel said:Are threads a bit like Gods ...........?:biglaugh:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Uuhhh. No?michel said:Are threads a bit like Gods ...........?:biglaugh:
I personally can't believe that you don't see that the thread exists. It's obvious to me that there is no good argument against its existence.Fatmop said:If you find happiness and fulfillment through your thread, then whether or not it exists doesn't really matter so much. Just don't keep quoting it at me and expecting me to believe it exists without evidence.
How can you blindly believe that the thread exists without any evidence? What revelation did you have to prove the existence of such a thread? And even if you had such a revelation...did others share in it and therefore validate your "proof"? For if it was just your own belief in the thread and nothing to back it up you can never be sure.jonny said:I personally can't believe that you don't see that the thread exists. It's obvious to me that there is no good argument against its existence.
But how can you prove that Pah does not exist?"Pah"? As if there is such a person.anybody who comes forth as this "Pah" is obviously a joker. Either insane or just faking it.
I can prove he does not exist simply because you can't prove he does.Malus 12:9 said:But how can you prove that Pah does not exist?
You really don't believe this is literal do you!?!Malus 12:9 said:RF 1:4: "And he came to me, the disciple of the one who is known as Todd; and he said unto me: 'Thee hath been warned; for thee hath cast evil unto the forum."
That's a direct purgery from a differnt holy book. Therefore, it can't be true. If there's two or more books that say the same thing, neither are true.Malus 12:9 said:RF 1:4: "And he came to me, the disciple of the one who is known as Todd; and he said unto me: 'Thee hath been warned; for thee hath cast evil unto the forum."
The Bibke is not ne book but many, dear.If there's two or more books that say the same thing, neither are true.
:areyoucra Since when were we talking about the Bible?Malus 12:9 said:The Bibke is not ne book but many, dear.
KJV, NIV, NLT,...and so forth :biglaugh:..Aqualung said:If there's two or more books that say the same thing,
Anyway, all this feuding about the thread's existence is, as I said before, pointless.
Perhaps the same could be said for many of the debates on this forum.because nobody's going to change anyone else's mind, anyway.
I'm open minded on this one. My opinion can be bought.Fatmop said:You do realize that it would be 'thou hast,' not 'thee hath...'
Anyway, all this feuding about the thread's existence is, as I said before, pointless. Let's just get on with our lives, each of us believing whatever he/she wants about the thread - because nobody's going to change anyone else's mind, anyway.
Thanks for catching the irony.Perhaps the same could be said for many of the debates on this forum.