• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

was..

Fatmop

Active Member
If you find happiness and fulfillment through your thread, then whether or not it exists doesn't really matter so much. Just don't keep quoting it at me and expecting me to believe it exists without evidence.
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
Fatmop said:
If you find happiness and fulfillment through your thread, then whether or not it exists doesn't really matter so much. Just don't keep quoting it at me and expecting me to believe it exists without evidence.
I personally can't believe that you don't see that the thread exists. It's obvious to me that there is no good argument against its existence.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
jonny said:
I personally can't believe that you don't see that the thread exists. It's obvious to me that there is no good argument against its existence.
How can you blindly believe that the thread exists without any evidence? What revelation did you have to prove the existence of such a thread? And even if you had such a revelation...did others share in it and therefore validate your "proof"? For if it was just your own belief in the thread and nothing to back it up you can never be sure.;)
 

Malus 12:9

Temporarily Deactive.
Unfortunatly, new evidence has been provided by a stout believer. Pah, could you bring forth the
log of this unknown thread to share it in it's light.
 

Aqualung

Tasty
"Pah"? As if there is such a person. :rolleyes: anybody who comes forth as this "Pah" is obviously a joker. Either insane or just faking it.
 

Malus 12:9

Temporarily Deactive.
"Pah"? As if there is such a person.
rolleyes.gif
anybody who comes forth as this "Pah" is obviously a joker. Either insane or just faking it.
But how can you prove that Pah does not exist?
 

Malus 12:9

Temporarily Deactive.
RF 1:4: "And he came to me, the disciple of the one who is known as Todd; and he said unto me: 'Thee hath been warned; for thee hath cast evil unto the forum."
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
Malus 12:9 said:
RF 1:4: "And he came to me, the disciple of the one who is known as Todd; and he said unto me: 'Thee hath been warned; for thee hath cast evil unto the forum."
:eek: You really don't believe this is literal do you!?!
 

Aqualung

Tasty
Malus 12:9 said:
RF 1:4: "And he came to me, the disciple of the one who is known as Todd; and he said unto me: 'Thee hath been warned; for thee hath cast evil unto the forum."
That's a direct purgery from a differnt holy book. Therefore, it can't be true. If there's two or more books that say the same thing, neither are true.
 

Fatmop

Active Member
You do realize that it would be 'thou hast,' not 'thee hath...'

Anyway, all this feuding about the thread's existence is, as I said before, pointless. Let's just get on with our lives, each of us believing whatever he/she wants about the thread - because nobody's going to change anyone else's mind, anyway.
 

jonny

Well-Known Member
Fatmop said:
You do realize that it would be 'thou hast,' not 'thee hath...'

Anyway, all this feuding about the thread's existence is, as I said before, pointless. Let's just get on with our lives, each of us believing whatever he/she wants about the thread - because nobody's going to change anyone else's mind, anyway.
I'm open minded on this one. My opinion can be bought.
 
Top