Frank Goad
Well-Known Member
Were in the bible does it say to love all sinners?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Welcome.Hi everyone
I'm new to the Forum.
There are two general meanings for the term "sinners".
In one sense, we all are sinners, so every text that refers to love another person implies that we love sinners.
In another sense, sinners refer to wicked people who deliberately and systematically oppose God. For a person who seeks to serve God, the company or communion with those people is not advisable... not possible. However, even in this situation, the believer is expected to love them, since Jesus said "Love your enemies".
Welcome.Hi everyone
I'm new to the Forum.
There are two general meanings for the term "sinners".
In one sense, we all are sinners, so every text that refers to love another person implies that we love sinners.
In another sense, sinners refer to wicked people who deliberately and systematically oppose God. For a person who seeks to serve God, the company or communion with those people is not advisable... not possible. However, even in this situation, the believer is expected to love them, since Jesus said "Love your enemies".
So -- here's how I also see it: if, let's say, I know a person is a thief. I might warn them that there is a God who is watching and who cares what they do. One reason could be in that example is that I believe God does not want that person to steal and also that he could get in trouble with the law of the land. (That's only one example...of loving others and God in my opinion.) How do you see it?Gut response:
Leviticus 19:18 + 1 John 1:8
"Love your fellow as you love yourself" and "acknowledge that you, yourself, are a sinner"
Therefore, all sinners are to be loved as one loves themself.
Hi also. Hope you enjoy the board. (Some people are easier than others to get along with...)Hi everyone
I'm new to the Forum.
There are two general meanings for the term "sinners".
In one sense, we all are sinners, so every text that refers to love another person implies that we love sinners.
In another sense, sinners refer to wicked people who deliberately and systematically oppose God. For a person who seeks to serve God, the company or communion with those people is not advisable... not possible. However, even in this situation, the believer is expected to love them, since Jesus said "Love your enemies".
If a group of people decided to make a new law, such as the proper use of pronouns, they just created a new sin out of thin air. It was not a sin yesterday, but now a new sin can and will be imputed, because we just made a new law with punishment and everything. In this case, there is no sin against God by ignoring the law, just a sin against the laws of man or woman.Romans 5;13 Sin is not imputed where there is no law.
Matthew 10:36; And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
The Gentiles eating with unwashed hands may be unsanitary, but it was not a sin. But an angry outburst, by the tongue, for a blind rule violation, was the real sin.Matthew 15;11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man, but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.”
James 3:5-6 (NIV)"The tongue is a small part of the body, but it makes great boasts. Consider what a great forest is set on fire by a small spark. The tongue also is a fire, a world of evil among the parts of the body.
Oftentimes people do the most heinous things, yet when caught and prosecuted their families might say how unfair the law is and do not speak against his sin.There's a lot of places that suggest loving our neighbors to be of utmost importance. There's also places that tell us to hate evil. Knowing human nature and what happens often enough when people get a little too mistreated, I can see how the lines blur and loving neighbors who cause evil becomes more like harbored rage with just enough holding some people back to not send them to the dirt. But, when too much becomes too much and we've done all we can do to bear the burdens of the neighbors who cause us so much evil, people break and falter and fall short like we all sometimes do. At least this much is truly expected. We all fall short. Anyway, I guess it comes down to separating actions from those who are responsible for them, which is difficult. Can you love your "evil" neighbor, yourself, your family, your community and not address the evils the neighbor causes? How is love involved in that scenario? Blurred lines and human nature with a plethora of consequences following in our wakes seems to be the common standard.
There are so-called laws (or rules) imposed here, sometimes not applying to the rulers. You think?If a group of people decided to make a new law, such as the proper use of pronouns, they just created a new sin out of thin air. It was not a sin yesterday, but now a new sin can and will be imputed, because we just made a new law with punishment and everything. In this case, there is no sin against God by ignoring the law, just a sin against the laws of man or woman.
This is referring to clan and clique laws and even individual philosophy. This might be OK if a person or group agrees for their group identity; secret handshake. But when it is applied to others, who do not wish to play, than one is making a law to create artificial sin, as a pretense to be a bully, thereby sinning against the law of God. It is better to ignore those, from the other group, who may not follow this manmade sin. You turn the other cheek; ignore them, if they decide to wear white after Labor Day, even if this is a cardinal fashion sin.
Foes of your own household are based on your beliefs and using these like laws to judge others. This keeps people divided. The political Left and Right or the Religious and Atheist each have different ways. Often each judge the others by the enemies of your own household; belief system, sort of imposing your group law and sins, based on that code, when it is better to live and let live; turn the other cheek.
The Mosiac law had Ten Commandments the rest are sort of clannish sins that are not really sins in the divine sense. Often the enforcement of manmade law and the imputed sin, will violate one of more of the original 10. A few year ago, US Federal law allowed people who were drug dealer to have their possessions stolen if they were caught; artificial sin used as a pretense to break divine law.
Jesus reduces the Divine law requirement even further to just 2 rules; Love God and Love your neighbor, with the rest not needed for the good person. The law was not made for the righteous man, but for the sinners. In this case, Jesus was speaking of rituals such as preparing Kosher food. This was/is a practical method that makes the food prep more sanitary. However, many people would forget about the original practical; cause and effect, and make it a blind ritual, that if not followed, was a sin in itself. The man who loved his neighbor would explain the upside and therefore why it is done this way. The sinner will yell and strike.
The Gentiles eating with unwashed hands may be unsanitary, but it was not a sin. But an angry outburst, by the tongue, for a blind rule violation, was the real sin.
The most evil part of the body is the tongue; negative talking; lies, gossips, maliciousness, propaganda, disinformation, etc. This is often where people judge each other, by their own philosophies and ambitions. It can set the world ablaze. Paranoid people can use the tongue to instigate new law and sin to target other groups. Often it takes good con artists; forked tongue of the hypocrite, who work for Satan.
I believe there are good and evil people in all groups. The good can accept what they believe. They are not personally offended if others believe differently; to each their own household. The evil will judge others by their own rules, maybe as a way to over compensate for doubt. Holding the tongue and counting to 10; turn the other cheek, is often a good way to diffuse the spark, less it grow and start a fire.
There's a lot of places that suggest loving our neighbors to be of utmost importance. There's also places that tell us to hate evil. Knowing human nature and what happens often enough when people get a little too mistreated, I can see how the lines blur and loving neighbors who cause evil becomes more like harbored rage with just enough holding some people back to not send them to the dirt. But, when too much becomes too much and we've done all we can do to bear the burdens of the neighbors who cause us so much evil, people break and falter and fall short like we all sometimes do. At least this much is truly expected. We all fall short. Anyway, I guess it comes down to separating actions from those who are responsible for them, which is difficult. Can you love your "evil" neighbor, yourself, your family, your community and not address the evils the neighbor causes? How is love involved in that scenario? Blurred lines and human nature with a plethora of consequences following in our wakes seems to be the common standard.
I'd be hard pressed to disagree. This doesn't change our nature nor the expectation and acknowledgement that we all fall short from time to time. What we leave in our wakes from our actions and treatment is where growth is made via consequence. It's not pleasant nor desired, but then Hebrew 12 says a thing or two about the necessity of these experiences. Rules expectations and consequence all for a better future and life experience. Ya, it sucks sometimes but ... No one ever said life was easy.Here are my two cents
Perhaps, in the context where Jesus pronounced the commandment "Love your enemies", love and hate were more about doing good or bad things to people, than to experiencing feelings.
This view is supported by the way Jesus explains how to express that love (if someone asks you to walk a mile with him, walk a second mile).
The compassionate love that resembles God's love of all His children is something we may develop little by little by the action of the Holy Spirit, but it was not the immediate concern of Jesus.
Jesus was concerned about poor people not killing rich people... Jews not killing Roman soldiers or tax collectors or Samaritans, etc.
What might change our actions is just what @Pancho Frijoles cited. And for some it could take a longer while than for others to apply the principle.I'd be hard pressed to disagree. This doesn't change our nature nor the expectation and acknowledgement that we all fall short from time to time. What we leave in our wakes from our actions and treatment is where growth is made via consequence. It's not pleasant nor desired, but then Hebrew 12 says a thing or two about the necessity of these experiences. Rules expectations and consequence all for a better future and life experience. Ya, it sucks sometimes but ... No one ever said life was easy.
I don't want to get too funny because some people don't like it, and of course, I don't want to offend them, but I have a pretty good comprehension of the English language and even I don't understand what @Balthazzar said. I hope he explains it, but sometimes, just as a little help, I think some here enjoy making things "beyond comprehension." Not saying that means Balthazzar. As the colloquial expression goes--"Just sayin'." (Nice having you on board...) P.S. Your English is great considering it's not your "mother tongue."Hi, @Balthazzar
I'm not in full command of English language, so I sometimes have problems to understand some words or sentences. My apologies in advance. Could you explain or paraphrase your sentence "What we leave in our wakes from our actions and treatment is where growth is made via consequence"?
P.S. Your English is great considering it's not your "mother tongue."
Hi, @Balthazzar
I'm not in full command of English language, so I sometimes have problems to understand some words or sentences. My apologies in advance. Could you explain or paraphrase your sentence "What we leave in our wakes from our actions and treatment is where growth is made via consequence"?
Oftentimes people do the most heinous things, yet when caught and prosecuted their families might say how unfair the law is and do not speak against his sin.There's a lot of places that suggest loving our neighbors to be of utmost importance. There's also places that tell us to hate evil. Knowing human nature and what happens often enough when people get a little too mistreated, I can see how the lines blur and loving neighbors who cause evil becomes more like harbored rage with just enough holding some people back to not send them to the dirt. But, when too much becomes too much and we've done all we can do to bear the burdens of the neighbors who cause us so much evil, people break and falter and fall short like we all sometimes do. At least this much is truly expected. We all fall short. Anyway, I guess it comes down to separating actions from those who are responsible for them, which is difficult. Can you love your "evil" neighbor, yourself, your family, your community and not address the evils the neighbor causes? How is love involved in that scenario? Blurred lines and human nature with a plethora of consequences following in our wakes seems to be the common standard.