Cooky
Veteran Member
You're so old school.
It's just what meets my fancy. That's all.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're so old school.
Of course "whataboutism" isn't a valid defense in name, but established court precedence is. If A's lawyer can present to the judge that C did the same thing, then C's actions and rulings made in that case do become relevant. Court, I would argue, is the best and strongest application of tu quoque as it helps create uniformity in the application of law and a court case is basically a philosophical debate. Outside of court using it is typically used as a way of basically just trying to change the subject.I would suggest that "whataboutism" or "tu quoque" would only be legitimately criticized and rejected in a court of law, where defendant A is on trial for some sort of criminal offense. If the only issue at hand is defendant A's guilt or innocence, then whataboutism would not be a relevant or valid defense.
Of course "whataboutism" isn't a valid defense in name, but established court precedence is. If A's lawyer can present to the judge that C did the same thing, then C's actions and rulings made in that case do become relevant. Court, I would argue, is the best and strongest application of tu quoque as it helps create uniformity in the application of law and a court case is basically a philosophical debate. Outside of court using it is typically used as a way of basically just trying to change the subject.
I've accused you of misogyny because you've said some very misogynistic things.Like when you accuse me of misogyny because you feel superior to me
Ok. And I accused you of misandry because you always say misandric thingsI've accused you of misogyny because you've said some very misogynistic things.
But I cannot accuse you of misandry..
So which one is it?And I accused you of misandry
That's not the point. You feel entitled to call me a misogynist for what I said... but it's just an arbitrary assumption of yours.So which one is it?
It's not an assumption with many of the posts you've made.but it's just an arbitrary assumption of yours.
So...the fact you have bias towards males isn't an assumption of mine either. Right?It's not an assumption with many of the posts you've made.
It is an assumption as things you've said about views about men have been wrong.So...the fact you have bias towards males isn't an assumption of mine either. Right?
perfect. You are always right and I'm always wrong.It is an assumption as things you've said about views about men have been wrong.
You made an incorrect assumption about my sexual orientation the time you accused me of misandry, and did think that had a part to do with my "misandry." You have excused, downplayed, and dismissed rape (and welcomed it in the world of hypothetically speaking), you have claimed men and women are not capable of being coworkers because the women will distract the men (the same mentality that forces women to cover up with niqabs and burkas). You've said some other things (and I have pointed them out), but those are the ones I remember.perfect. You are always right and I'm always wrong.
As you wish, your majesty.
You made an incorrect assumption about my sexual orientation the time you accused me of misandry, and did think that had a part to do with my "misandry." You have excused, downplayed, and dismissed rape (and welcomed it in the world of hypothetically speaking), you have claimed men and women are not capable of being coworkers because the women will distract the men (the same mentality that forces women to cover up with niqabs and burkas). You've said some other things (and I have pointed them out), but those are the ones I remember.
Any time I mention me spewing acid, or raining acid, or any sort of thing like that, it's because I'm very aware of that can go straight for vital organs if someone pushes me hard enough (such as the other day in a thread when I mentioned "jack hammer stabbing-and-electric drill twisting a verbal knife in god's chest" (it was more of a response to a thread than anything)).you are not able to understand your words may hurt people.
You asked why people think you're a misogynist, and kept on doing the things I pointed out to you.I 've never downplayed rape and there's a private conversation between me and you that proves it.
btw I am not a misogynist.You asked why people think you're a misogynist, and kept on doing the things I pointed out to you.