To be honest, I don't want to spend the time and effort digging it up for you. Poke around the years of data gathered by PEW research - they have an article or two on the reasons for conversion that are relevant to what's being asked here. Look at the academic literature that studies religions in a comparative context. Better yet, listen to what affiliates of theistic religions have to say about the reasons for their affiliation. I mean really listen to their stories... which means not layering our own narratives over what they are saying in a way that distorts or invalidates theirs. Honestly, it should be enough for me to tell you "I'm sorry, but this does not characterizes the experiences I've had with religions throughout my life," to make one stop and reconsider.
Very well.
I have already done a decent few hours of research on this subject, but I'll reopen those in respect to your reference.
But what I am stating in this observation is quite simple, no need for complexities.
This is an example of not really listening to what affiliates are saying, and you layering your own narrative over the top of it (or "negating" their perspective, to use a term I spoke in the last post). Many theists are certain about their god(s) and know their god(s). Regardless of whether or not you or I agree with that, that's how they feel. It's important to recognize that if one wants to do a properly impartial study. Granted, that level of academic impartiality isn't what is relevant in day-to-day life. You're certainly free to tell what stories you like about theistic religions and the reasons for various things. I suppose I just hope that you exercise caution with the brush you paint with and recognize that a bunch of us aren't going to fit on the canvass you're making.
I am not adding my own narrative, nor am I ignoring the ones given.
I have made an observation based on basic-ish definitions and actions of religious communities with theistic beliefs.
How someone feels about those is irrelevant. Their arguments against it are not, however.
You seem to be interpreting what I am saying, when you should just take me literally.
I can see counter arguments you can make, and different definitions you can use.
I'm not out to insult the theistic population, not necessarily. I'm debating a topic.
There is hardly anything I don't research before giving my two cents on.
I didn't just come into this thread to start an internet fight with a few people whom I know will disagree with me.
I am using proper definitions and observations to draw a conclusion, that's the gist of it.
