It would take a lot for me to even accept that something was a "god" in the first place, honestly. Once that had been established, and the thing had been demonstrated to meet some basic definition of "god" that I could accept, only then would it even make sense to discuss what qualities it did or didn't have that would make it worthy of admiration and praise.
And what I find truly interesting is that as I sit here, thinking on what those attributes might be, I realize they are the attributes that I, myself, highly prize. For example, I don't think I could admire, or praise the actions or reactions of a God that shied away from confrontation. Though I wouldn't look to it to actively start confrontations, as this doesn't promote peace (another item of high prize on my list), I would admire the idea that it reacted to confrontation brought to its doorstep with fortitude and a cool head. I would admire it only if it always had rational and practical reasoning backing any and all prescriptions or requirements it had of people, and readily and freely gave those reasons honestly and forthrightly. I would admire it if it had the best interests of all living things in mind, and not just the best interests of human beings - if it could and would cherish and honor the perspectives of the other denizens of this planet who I feel deserve such consideration just as much as humans. In other words, it would need to be very much unlike many of the gods that have been presented by various religions in order for me to genuinely admire the way it behaved.