• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What are the "facts" of Evolution?

jarofthoughts

Empirical Curmudgeon
How do Evolutionists explain how exotic birds got their bright colors? . .

Usually a bird's colours comes from melanin, a pigment derived from the amino acid tyrosine, although some get their colours from the things they eat or from other things in the environment.
Flamingos for instance get their pinkish colour from the carotenoids in crustaceans that are a part of their diet.
 

AmbiguousGuy

Well-Known Member
How do Evolutionists explain how exotic birds got their bright colors? . .

Females are attracted to the brightest males. Why? Well, because they figure that if a male is hardy enough to survive even while drawing all that attention to himself, then he's tough, smart, etc. and probably good mating material.

So the males get brighter and brighter. Peacocks get peacockier.

That's the theory as I've heard it, anyway.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
fantôme profane;2481557 said:
Wishful thinking. So far creationism has shown itself to be completely immune to evidence, logic and reason. What do you think will spell the doom of creationism if these things have had no effect so far?

Societal pressures. Ignorance is becoming far too costly a choice for one to have.

Sure, there will always be evolution-deniers. But they by necessity wield such a strong degree of lack of knowledge that they will soon have an unacceptably hard time trying to participate in the job market and other major parts of society.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
Females are attracted to the brightest males. Why? Well, because they figure that if a male is hardy enough to survive even while drawing all that attention to himself, then he's tough, smart, etc. and probably good mating material.

So the males get brighter and brighter. Peacocks get peacockier.

That's the theory as I've heard it, anyway.
Actually, this has been verified experimentally. Perhaps the most famous example is with guppies. They can develop bright colors when not exposed to dangerous predators, because they attract mates better with the bright colors. In an environment with lots of predators, the ones that blend in with the background tend to proliferate more than the fancier ones. It may be more disappointing to the female guppies, but they have to work with the males they get, drab as those males may be.
 

Gunfingers

Happiness Incarnate
There's a weak correlation, I'd imagine, but there's no causal link. The association between atheism and evolution is about the same as the association between atheism and every other scientific principle.
 

Copernicus

Industrial Strength Linguist
Darwin himself was not a believer in the Christian God, although he may have been more of a deist than an atheist. His wife was extremely upset at his lack of religious belief, and his reluctance to upset her more may have delayed his publication of his ideas. In any case, Wallace, who also stumbled on the same principle of natural selection independently, was much more religious.

The theory of evolution has been embraced by religious scientists, because it only contradicts biblical literalism. The doctrine of theistic evolution makes evolution theory palatable to many modern Christians, but surveys of opinion tend to vary according to how questions are framed. I think that a sizable number of people think that they accept evolution theory and that God pretty much created us and all species as they are. People can have contradictory opinions on subjects, especially when it comes to religious topics. For an interesting article on the history of the debate, see Darwin Debated: Religion vs. Evolution.
 
Last edited:

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
So . . .Evolution isn't associated with Atheism?

Not significantly, anyway.

Atheists are evolutionists as a matter of course, but so are many theists. It is a matter of having access to the current knowledge, not one of ideology or religious conviction.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Erhm . . . Evolutionist Humanism?

What about it? Evolutionism is not incompatible with either Atheism nor Humanism, of course.

And there are those who extrapolate the concept for evolution to other fields, as well. But it really is a separate matter.
 

RitalinO.D.

Well-Known Member
Not significantly, anyway.

Atheists are evolutionists as a matter of course, but so are many theists. It is a matter of having access to the current knowledge, not one of ideology or religious conviction.

Most times yes, but there are Atheists that are not proponents of evolution, or any theory of the likes. Some don't believe in a God and don't care how it all happened.
 
Top