Enforcement of rights becomes impossible because those who violate the rights of others forfeit their own? Then justice is impossible and we're back to square one with despotism or anarchy. People who advocate for subjective morality only want the double standard which favors those who rely on deception and force. Though of course those who practice deception have always naturally argued otherwise.
Stereotyping leading to such mistrust that any argument made against it is immediately treated as "deception" or "manipulation". Typical conspiranoia.
Read it again. It does naturally meander, of necessity. But no matter how you crunch the numbers, it always comes back to that 2% who comprise the elite oligarchy, no matter what PC label they stick on it. It even looks like National Socialism has come full circle.
Ah, the Hitler Card. One of the most common Red Herrings. Also called Argumentum ad Nazium.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/adnazium.html
Of course, it is ironically relevant, because they were the political group that, of course, tried to impose
its objective morality on the world.
Them, alongside many others before. England, France, and Spain have all attempted this. America is the current carrier of this Torch: the Light of Rome.
That light that detests shadow so much that it seeks to eliminate it altogether. Completely blind to the fact that without shadow, light is just as blinding as darkness.
If it was, I'd be a Christian, warts and all. Unfortunately you just can't make that square peg of Truth fit in that round Christian hole.
I'll concede that one. It was a mistake for me to regard such thinking as inherently "Christian." Sure, we got the concept of objective morality from dominant forms of Christianity, but they were neither the ones who invented it, nor is it inherent in that religion.
