... and what do you think it adds to the Bible?
Let's assume - as many Christians do - that the Bible was created in accordance with an overall plan. The implication, then, is that the Bible was incomplete until that last book was written, but became complete with the completion of that last book.
However you date the books of the Bible (and you can find some estimates here: Early Christian Writings: New Testament, Apocrypha, Gnostics, Church Fathers), you presumably think that one of the books was written last. So...
- which book do you think that was?
- what does that book add to the message of the Bible that would have been missing without that book?
Let's assume - as many Christians do - that the Bible was created in accordance with an overall plan. The implication, then, is that the Bible was incomplete until that last book was written, but became complete with the completion of that last book.
However you date the books of the Bible (and you can find some estimates here: Early Christian Writings: New Testament, Apocrypha, Gnostics, Church Fathers), you presumably think that one of the books was written last. So...
- which book do you think that was?
- what does that book add to the message of the Bible that would have been missing without that book?