Honestly, I just expect you to tell me what makes you rely on this theory and why.
That's all.
Of course you will have to point out whether you are a theist or an atheist.
I am neither extreme, but prefer rational science, over dice and cards science, that need faith in a mutation lottery in a black box.
When I was young, I liked to garden. I still do, but have less room. I would grow things from seed, usually planting way more seeds than I needed; use six pack cells, to get a head start on the season. Like natural selection, I would pick and choose about 25% of my seedlings and give the rest to neighbors.
I selected based on how vigorous and perfect the seedlings looked at 3-4 weeks. I was applying natural selection by seeking the best for my garden space. I was also thoughtful in terms of the placement of all the different vegetable, so I could optimize my space and as well as all my plants; tall in the back, sun neediest in the best sun, summer crop where the spring crop was, etc.
Humans have a natural common sense, and copy what nature does. I could see how nature works, allowing a very healthy forests with flora and fauna. My mother liked gardening and she would decorate the yard each spring, with new specimen plants and flower beds and I learned from her. I added the vegetable gardens.
When I learned about Darwin and Evolution, in school, I was already a practitioner. The only things that started to bother me, later in school, was the random approach connected to genetics, which I learned as I got older. The random approach seemed subjective and not very objective.
The genetic approach to evolution starts with replicators instead of from scratch. That is cheating. They load the dice of evolution with replicators and apply laws of chance, as though the dice are not already loaded; self fulfilling prophesy. I start with empty water, which is harder, but honest. I still accept Darwin's contribution, in essence, but from a bio-physical chemical approach, water is my main variable, since even DNA will not work without water. Water can still do all types of things without the DNA.
The water and oil effect, where water and oil will separate if blended together, is how water pushes the organics into pockets, getting rid of much of the randomness. The DNA double helix is due to the water and oil effect. If we use other solvents a different DNA shape forms; sloppy double helix, that is not bioactive. Water and oil/organic has the biggest difference in chemistry, allowing water to put the squeeze on the organics in the most powerful way. Newly formed protein in water are folded by the water to minimize the water potential; water and oil effect, and in doing so in space and time, always fold and packs it the same. Water's job is to get minimize the random. It is against my common sense to except random with such a powerful ordering inducing variable; water.
