ecco
Veteran Member
All evidence can be challenged into infinity and I have no desire to do that in this case (I am not the OP person and was just a commenter)
I know you are not the OP, I can follow a thread.
I am not going to make this case a personal research project.
A personal research project? Are you serious? There is nothing to research. You stated that there were multiple first hand accounts of the paranormal in the article and or reports.
If you were honest when you wrote that, then it should be easy to pick one and present it. You haven't been able to. Because there aren't any. But you are so into woo that your brain reads paranormal even when there isn't any. When you get challenged you try various dodges and evasions. The sad part is you can't be honest even with yourself. So you have to make excuses.
Sure, you remember seeing this on TV four years ago. You don't realize that you are just digging your hole deeper and deeper with each post you make.In fact I have seen people interviewed and this case discussed on TV and other places too.
Is it possible that ithe key claims are all based on lies? Yes, always possible. Do I think so? No, I think that is highly unlikely based on all I have seen, heard and know about this particular case, the number and quality of witnesses and the paranormal in general.
Not.....one.....single.....first.....hand.....account.....of.....anything.....paranormal.
The only person you are fooling is yourself.