• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What do you make of Bell Hooks' ideas?

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
What do you make of Bell Hooks' ideas? Especially her notion that feminism needs to shift away "from the original focus [on] victimization, and towards harboring understanding, appreciation, and tolerance for all genders and sexes so that all are in control of their own destinies, uncontrolled by patriarchal, capitalist tyrants." Source.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
I would say feminism already does the latter.
 

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
I speak to a radical leaning womanist and she did say that the difference between feminism and womanism is that womanism is more focused on healing and she said it's more spiritual. But I need the context of the quote because she could be referring to the black community, and white women do better than black men in some aspects so it's a bit more "easier" to be more inclusive of black men when you are a WOC. I would also like to read more bell hooks, I could be wrong but I believe she's more on the sex critical side of things as well.
 

Orbit

I'm a planet
bell hooks has written extensively about feminist topics, and I'm a huge fan, especially of her writings on art and culture. I see nothing wrong with the quote in the OP.
 

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
If I take the quote as it is, I would say I agree with it to a certain extent but only when it's balanced. If I'm still oppressed than I can't focus my thinking solely on healing and move away from the context of patriarchy when it comes to my choices and how I'm viewed and treated. I think I am already tolerant of all genders, I'm just not tolerant of gender socialisation. However I would say what's contributed to my personal happiness is forming connections with other radical females and radical transwomen. Just knowing I'm not "alone" has helped me significantly, something that forming connections with men will never give me. It can be extremely lonely and isolating being radical.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
What do you make of Bell Hooks' ideas? Especially her notion that feminism needs to shift away "from the original focus [on] victimization, and towards harboring understanding, appreciation, and tolerance for all genders and sexes so that all are in control of their own destinies, uncontrolled by patriarchal, capitalist tyrants." Source.

We tend to print a lot of Zines with her ideas, especially on race, class, sexism, and the failings of the educational system. I'm quite biased in favor of her. :D

As an educator, I fully embrace her methodologies in being engaged and having an expansive and diverse set of tools to reach an audience and to remain as part of the audience as those one is speaking to.

She's a spitfire, in the best way possible. I like to read her works, since they are dynamic and colorful. She doesn't shy away from revealing the detrimental impact that exploitation creates.

Funny, how once Beyonce did her MTV awards show performance, where she unapologetically showed she is a feminist, most folks in these parts were asking, "Okay, cool...now what does Bell Hooks have to say about it?"

That speaks volumes about her influence in intersectionality and the use of media in feminist messages to the public.

I'd recommend her books and her essays to anyone, personally. She helps bring a passion to my teachings as a woman to young and teenaged girls, as well as to young women in my classes.
 

Wherenextcolumbus

Well-Known Member
Yeah so after a quick google search I would say she is definitely more radical leaning. Even quotes Audre Lorde who was anti-porn, sex critical, BDSM critical. There is so much radical feminist literature out there that I really need to hurry up and read.
 

Politesse

Amor Vincit Omnia
I'm not sure I see the difference between "harboring understanding, appreciation, and tolerance for all genders and sexes" and defending the victims of gender-related crimes. Don't you kind of have to do the one to do the other? Assuming that someone is "playing the victim" rather than actually being a victim, just because she's a woman, doesn't sound like mutual respect to me. So I guess I agree with half of that sentence whole heartedly, but am a bit suspicious of the other half. That said, I'm not familiar with her body of work, so I've only got your post to go from.
 
Top