• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What do you think of the virgin birth of Jesus ?

What's your opinion about the virgin birth of Jesus


  • Total voters
    46

Shad

Veteran Member
The humans are dailly killed and eating animals , and humans are dailly killing each other .

So? Appeal to hypocrisy.


then
why the kids die ?

Due to natural limitation of our species.



Since God will make us all die , and some punished and tested us in this life, and punished and reward in afterlife , and He did what he want , that dehumanizing and dictator ?

Red herring. I am talking about inflecting a child with a disease on purpose in order to teach another person a lesson. This is dehumanizing as it treats the inflicted as a tool not a person. This is different from someone catching a disease without a purpose behind it.






Did i said human are tools with no emotions ?

seems we don't agree in views , you mixed the treatement of human to human , God to humans .

Your argument for god does and you have no issue with it so you accept dehumanization as valid for god thus support the view. I am argument that two sentient intelligent being should not be treated with cruelity on a whim just because one is superior. Heard of animal rights laws? Cruelty against animals?






whatever you can't reject His decision by not allowed to you live forever .

I can reject the concept thus your argument has no impact. You are producing a presupposition argument that I even accept god exists. I am attacking your concept of god as a concept.




God which creat the child by causing the parents to produce from their bodies sperms and egg to be combine . as the tongue/mouth produce the sound/words .

So no freewill? God forces them to have sex? More so the implication that god also creates birth defects, stillborn, etc. Also there is an issue that if god caused the child to exist then god is responsible for the person thus can not judge them. This is can be applied to those incapable of belief as god made us this way thus we can not be judged for how we are made.

then why the parents could not decide the gender/weight/color/beauty/life-time of child (without help of doctor ) ?

They can without a doctor, its called selective breeding which we have done to animals for thousands of years before the idea of genetics and modern medical knowledge. Cows and dogs are a prime example.

why some parents could not had kids ?

Sorry I do not know what you mean by this in relation to the comment.



who created the first parents in the world ?

You are assuming the first parent is plural as more than one. This is a basic ignorance of biology and evolutionary timelines.
 
Top