• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What Does it Take For Time to Manifest Itself?

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
The argument is if you don't see any change occurring does that mean time does not exist. It's a little more subtle and nuance argument that what I just said. I'm not Julian Barbour but that's the gist of it.
How can one see anything if no change is occuring.?
 

dfnj

Well-Known Member
How can one see anything if no change is occuring.?

That's the point of the argument. You should watch this video and stop making peanut gallery comments:


This guy is a physicist who has studied the nature of time his whole life. I am barely grasping what he is saying. But I believe his point of view on the subject is different than yours.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Consider:

a) Everything in the universe is at a complete standstill. There isn't a single movement occurring anywhere; not even at the atomic/subatomic level.* Can time be said to exist?

b) A single, lone atom arises in which its sole electron orbits its nucleus. At one moment it is here and at another moment it is there.* Does this mean time is now necessarily "running"?

c) If the answer to a is NO and if the answer to b is YES, does this mean that time is a function of movement/change of state? Perhaps even solely so?​



* I know this would mean stuff would not exist, but this is a thought problem, so bear with me. ;)

*
Yeah, yeah, I know. :rolleyes:
.
.
time is a measurement
movement is the item measured

no movement?.....nothing to be measrued
no time
 
Top