dybmh
ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים
Since Luke is the writer of Acts and writes about Paul, I don't see Luke acting like a Pharisee
I have finished reading Acts and I have studied this concept of spiritual Israel.
First, I agree that the author of Acts is not acting like a Pharisee. This is because all theological claims are spiritually sourced. There is nothing in Acts which indicates the transfer of the name Israel to some other nation. Nor is there an abrogation of the Mosaic law. In fact, what is described in Acts is the OPPOSITE of an abrogation of the law. It upholds the law in multiple places. It confirms different rules for the non-Jew compared to the Jew.
At best, a person can look to Matthew 21:43. But this does not transfer the name Israel. It transfers what Jesus describes as the Kingdom of God. Further, in Acts 1, the possibility for Israel to return to the Kingdom is left open ended. It is within the jurisdiction of the Father, not the apostles. The fact that the so-called "Spiritual Israel" does not exist in writing, and is only inferred by the epistles/letters proves conclusively that this is a man-made doctrine which does not exist in the Hebrew bible, nor in the words of Jesus, nor in the Acts of the Apostles. If it was true, pure, and holy a person would not need to go to a letter. They would be able to go to the word of God. Further, in context, none of the epistles transfer the name Israel to anyone else. Romans claims that the name can be lost by an individual, but it doesn't say that it can be transferred. Peter describes the glory and beauty of the Christian people as equivilant or better than Israel. And only in closing in Galatians is there a blessing offered to the remnant of Israel of God. No one, and no where is the name Israel being transferred. Spritual Israel is a man-made doctrine.
My objection is primarily the theft of the name Israel. The apostles are called to be a witness. That is in Acts 1. They are not called to change, amend, or remove. A witness tells the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. This is the divine mandate and their holy purpose. Theft is a lie. The thief has lied to themself, has deluded themself to magically take possession of something which is not theirs. And when it comes to identity theft, they are lying to others.
Theft is a crime of the highest order against God and creation. It is a law binding on each and every human living being. It is the first crime, in the beginning, occuring in the garden. Not only are Adam and Eve guilty, but also the serpent who steals God's authority staking a claim on God's knowledge and offering it to Eve. ( "... For God knows that in the day you eat of it, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil." ) And all of this is born from Envy. The serpent envied Adam, and envied God. The serpent desired Eve, and also desired to be acknowledged/worshipped as equal to God. God is the knower. The serpent stole this and claimed it. It's a theft of God's identity which was leveraged against the innocent. That is a crime against God and creation.
This same crime spread and results in the Great Flood. If you notice, in Genesis 6:2, the women were being taken as wives. Taken by those to whom they did not belong. It was theft. Women as wives were given to man and none other per Genesis 1:24 Just like the serpent, the women were desired and then they were taken in spite of divine law. This led to violence, and corruption, and robbery over the entire earth.
The point I'm making is that theft is very old. The prohibtion is much older than Moses, it goes back to the very beginning, and it is incumbent on everyone over the face of all the earth. This is confirmed by Zecharia 5:3-4:
Then he said to me: “This is the curse that is going out over the face of all the earth, because everyone who steals, as written on its one side, has gone unpunished; and everyone who makes a sworn oath, as written on its other side, has gone unpunished. 4 ‘I have sent it out,’ declares Jehovah of armies, ‘and it will enter into the house of the thief and into the house of the one who makes a false oath in my name; and it will remain inside that house and consume it and its timbers and its stones.’”
Hopefully this explains my strong reaction to the theft of the name Israel which is indeed a man-made doctrine. Everyone who steals, a curse will enter their house and consume it. And being directed to accept a man-made doctrine from a Christian is hypocrisy.
There is so much good contained in the Christian bible. There is no reason or authority for a Christian to take the name Israel or anything which was not given or revealed to them.
Last edited: