Well Auto here is a summary of what evidence your ancestry back to early life looks like for a start, and it goes downhill from here on: I wouldn't sprook about it if I were you. You'll be torn to shreds. I have told you many many times you do NOT have evidence for evolution. What you have are theories that support evolution. The evidence supports creation.
Wiki Fossil
Earliest fossiliferous sites
Lower
Proterozoic Stromatolites from
Bolivia, South America
Earths oldest fossils are the
stromatolites consisting of rock built from layer upon layer of
sediment and other precipitants.
[3] Based on studies of now-rare (but living) stromatolites (specifically, certain
blue-green bacteria), the growth of fossil stromatolitic structures was biogenetically mediated by mats of
microorganisms through their entrapment of sediments. However,
abiotic mechanisms for stromatolitic growth are also known,
leading to a decades-long and sometimes-contentious scientific debate regarding biogenesis of certain formations, especially those from the lower to middle
Archaean eon.
It is most widely accepted that stromatolites from the late Archaean and through the middle
Proterozoic eon were mostly formed by massive
colonies of
cyanobacteria (formerly known as blue-green "algae"), and that the
oxygen byproduct of their
photosynthetic metabolism first resulted in earths massive
banded iron formations and subsequently oxygenated earths atmosphere.
Even though it is extremely rare, microstructures resembling
cells are sometimes found within stromatolites;
but these are also the source of scientific contention. The
Gunflint Chert contains abundant
microfossils widely accepted as a diverse consortium of 2.0
Ga microbes.
[4]
In contrast, putative fossil cyanobacteria cells from the 3.4 Ga
Warrawoona Group in Western Australia
are in dispute since abiotic processes cannot be ruled out.
[5] Confirmation of the Warrawoona microstructures as cyanobacteria would profoundly impact our understanding of when and how
early life diversified, pushing important
evolutionary milestones further back in time.
The continued study of these oldest fossils is paramount to calibrate complementary molecularphylogenetics models.
Do you even understand your own science? Every single taxon you have has huge inconsistencies. The tree of life is dying in favour of cladistics as a result of recent phylogenic data. You are way behind the times Auto.
You shouldn't give any creationist a hard time for quoting from the bible because using your theoretical assumptions as evidence is no better evidence than quoting from a comic strip.
Where would we be if models and explanations didn't adapt to new evidence. But the proposal stays the same, and there hasn't been any evidence to debunk the main points. It's just the details that aren't quite all clear. But what details are there about your hypothesis lol? God created all, the end. K thanks.