Kooky
Freedom from Sanity
By us not dieing in nuclear fire? I guess I very much prefer human civilization not ending, yes.That's exactly how wars are won by the bad guy too.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
By us not dieing in nuclear fire? I guess I very much prefer human civilization not ending, yes.That's exactly how wars are won by the bad guy too.
It's Putin yelling BOO as he crushes the Ukraine laughing at scaredy-cats as he goes by in victory.By us not dieing in nuclear fire? I guess I very much prefer human civilization not ending, yes.
Sino? They attacked indonesia, Philiipines,
numerous island, Britain, Holland and the USA.
Thailand, Burma...forced the
French to surrender territory.
Italy didnt get a raw deal in WW1.
Russia attacked Finland and Poland.
So do I.I personally think that NATO should stay as a defensive alliance.
.
Perhaps. But Hitler rose independently of WW1 & Russia.
He could've worked the same duplicitous deal with the Czar.
I'd rather be called a "scaredy cat" by an ignoramus clueless about the nature of nuclear war, than be dead from radiation poisoning because some military macho idiot wasn't concerned enough of the facts at hand.It's Putin yelling BOO as he crushes the Ukraine laughing at scaredy-cats as he goes by in victory.
This European thinks the same about this war as he does about every other; that after several millennia of increasingly industrialised, ever more destructive warfare, humanity is faced with a simple choice; either find another way to resolve differences between tribes, cultures, nations and neighbours, or watch the lights go out for ever. The only way to win a war, is for both sides to stop fighting.
There are no civilised sides in war. You can say that in Ukraine Russia is the aggressor, but once you meet aggression with aggression, there is no civility left. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy, and in every case, both sides have failed.
Advocates of the “just war” philosophy tend to cite WWII as their best example. But even this seemingly existential struggle between good and evil, was a direct result of the failure of diplomacy in 1918, when excessively punitive terms were imposed on Germany by the Treaty of Versailles.
I absolutely agree. The question though is what do we do when one side wants diplomacy but the other side keeps fighting?This European thinks the same about this war as he does about every other; that after several millennia of increasingly industrialised, ever more destructive warfare, humanity is faced with a simple choice; either find another way to resolve differences between tribes, cultures, nations and neighbours, or watch the lights go out for ever. The only way to win a war, is for both sides to stop fighting.
What the EU has already done - try and wreck their economy to make their war more difficult in the longer term.I absolutely agree. The question though is what do we do when one side wants diplomacy but the other side keeps fighting?
Well that’s what the EU has done, but what can Ukraine itself do?What the EU has already done - try and wreck their economy to make their war more difficult in the longer term.
This is difficult because EU is quite dependent on Russia in some key areas, of course.
That will happen soon if not already.Zelensky asked the Italian Parliament to freeze Russians' accounts and to close the ports to their ships.
Yeah...in a parallel universe...maybe
In the interspace.
Ukraine has offered "heroic" resistance to the Russian invasion, Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi said after the Ukrainian leader's speech.
"The arrogance of the Russian government has collided with the dignity of the Ukrainian people, who have managed to curb Moscow's expansionist aims and impose a huge cost on the invading army," he told parliament.
That will happen soon if not already.
Ukraine war latest: We are on brink of surviving war with Russia says Zelensky - BBC News
I don't think that an unelected banker represents people's will.
The elected representatives love him and want him to lead.On 17 February, Draghi won a confidence vote in the Senate, with 262 votes in favour, 40 against and 2 abstentions.[77] On the following day, he won a further confidence vote in the Chamber of Deputies with 535 votes in favour, 56 against and 5 abstentions; this margin represented one of the largest ever majorities in the history of the Italian Republic.
Hold out for as long as possible, try to negotiate a ceasefire.Well that’s what the EU has done, but what can Ukraine itself do?
I guess I’m not sure what that means. Hold out? I don't think Ukraine fired a shot until Russia invaded. Once an invasion begins, should the invaded country refrain from fighting back?Hold out for as long as possible, try to negotiate a ceasefire.
I absolutely agree. The question though is what do we do when one side wants diplomacy but the other side keeps fighting?
According to many surveys, 69% of Italians want to deal with Putin.The elected representatives love him and want him to lead.
Mario Draghi - Wikipedia
I meant it in this sense:I guess I’m not sure what that means. Hold out? I don't think Ukraine fired a shot until Russia invaded. Once an invasion begins, should the invaded country refrain from fighting back?
Definition of HOLD OUT1 : to remain unsubdued or unyielding
"where 30 of the … refugees were still holding out"— Anna Tomforde
also : to continue to function or be available
"prayed that the engine would hold out"
"as long as our money holds out"
2 : to refuse to go along with others in a concerted action or to come to an agreement
"holding out for a shorter workweek"