In some ways, there is divine judgment in Hinduism. Between sects, this is variously specified as an element of one's own Self, the cosmic Self, or both. In the Vedas, the earliest Hindu scriptures, we have Yama the deva of death. There is some judgment process involved, an accounting of one's karmic profit and loss statement, so tp speak, merit and demerit tallied up, with the future resulting rebirth determined thereby; that is to say, when this concept of judgment occurs, it's intimately connected with death; it causes the placement of birth which - teh genetics, and the environment, factor to present them their appropriate karma which is embodied in their physical experience.
Not only Vaishnavas believe in Kalki, Shaivas will also profess a belief in avatars. Kalki is one of particular importance, or some equivalent age-turning character. Oddly, in tantric BUddhism, which shares the same historical origin and many of the same practices oriented around internal pilgrimage, and walking with that most intimate friend in all things, sometimes carrying him like a precious young child, sometimes being carried purely on surrender.
In the Kalachakra tradition, Kalki(n) is also cast in a role; there is also an age-turning prophecy. Here, rarher than an avatar of Vishnu, he's an avatar of a tantric Buddha figure, who is linked in origin to views of both Vishnu and Shiva in the agamic traditions of Hinduism; the Shaiva, Shakta and Vaishnava agamas. The internal pilgrimage method then determined external temple design with the two to be taught simultaneously, the temple itself as a visual instruction method for internal contemplation.
In performing this worship in internal Kalachakra temples, one invoked him as Kalkin, the ender and beginner of ages to unfold the dharma on a universal scale - and it does involve some form of divine conflict, with righteous action, 'retribution' / justice, what-have-you, etc.
This idea presents itself in the puranas and agamas, in various places.
But, in stark contrast to the Abrahamic idea, the Hindu idea -o f any stripe, does not involve a specific, dramatic moment in the earth's time span where present and/or past inhabitants are suddenly judged; getting their 'just deserts,' whatever that may happen to be. [clearing throat, looking askance].
People do that to themselves continuously through life and death. In our "upheavel times" there is divine retribution to a degree, divine justice if you will, - such sa for example, tjhe curse of our sages (rishis). When Kalkin comes, he is said to bring struggle with him for the dharma to triumph, just as previously with wheel-turning events; Krishna, Rama.
Or whichever events, in one's own theology, one subscribes to regarding transition periods in Hinduism for all the variety of views on this topic that entail, even some which may not believe in different ages or transitionary periods.
Regardless, there is nothing in Hinduism like the Abrahamic judgment day. The only things close have very different emphasis, and in the Hindu scenario, there is no function of-judging everybody in a single go. It is, through whatever explanation a given sect has, a more decentralized process on a case by case and continual basis.
Time and death are already acomplishing the objective of judgment and justice;selection fr reincarnation.
When these upheavel events occur, only the most wicked tend to be judged, and even that judgment does not constitute any eternal punishment scenario but eventual redemption.