• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is Contemplative Christianity?

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
That is exactly the point I've been making again and again about how someone may not be not a candidate for meditation practices because they either suffer from psychological/psychiatric disorders, or that they were not ready to encounter themselves on this level. I think there is a danger for some. They are not ready to meet the devil, so to speak, and they then run and hide even further away from a confrontation with themselves in religious fanaticism, or some other unhealthy form of dissociation.

But because a few individuals have problem, does not mean the whole majority who do not should not practice it. I used the analogy of citing a few airplane crashes to justify one's paranoia about the safety of air travel, or citing individual who survived a car crash not wearing seatbelts to justify the irrational fear of the danger of using seat belts. It's same thing. Statistically, it's rare. It's an irrational response.

As I said, fundamentalism is a spiritual disease. It's a pathological dissociation that results in an inability to empathize with others because they are unable to know that towards themselves through self-awareness and self-honesty. Honestly, when Jesus says to make clean the inside of the cup first, it's because if we are not at peace with ourselves, we are incapable of being at peace with others. It all begins inside, and no amount of preaching from the outside does the work we all have to do individually from the inside. And each person does this differently, because each person is unique. There is no single practice that can be dictated to others to follow. Jesus shows the Way, not means and methods of your individual practice, and for good reason. Each person is unique.

Hi Windwalker,

He became an instructor of mysticism/meditation for 6 years, how can you say that he is suffering from psychiatric orders. An instructor for 6 years? Absolutely not that reason. He tried it, tested it and experience it. What more you can say? We may not know how the God of truth (Jesus) will act upon each and everyone of us. If we see Jesus as the Way, the Truth and the Life, there is no reason that the truth will be compromised, mixed and taken it 50% of the truth. A person who has no spiritual discernment may fall to spiritual blindness. If following and renewing our mind does not conform to the word of God as 100% obedient to His word, I believed it cannot be a 100% commitment and submission to God. When the phrase "Not my will, but Thy will be done" is not 100%, it is the will of men who desires to reach the path of the world rather than the true path of righteousness. What is denying yourself ( for Christ) if there is no 100% denying of oneself?:)

Thanks
 
Last edited:

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
<sigh> Have you studied biblical Greek at the graduate level? Anamnesis doesn't mean "remembrance" or "recalling" in the way you suppose it does. it most definitely is not a "memorial." You have misinterpreted the word and, thereby, desecrate the meaning of what the Eucharist does.
Can you give your source of reference and show it to me that anamnesis does not mean remembrance?

We do this so that we may share that meal with Jesus.
Exactly! sharing that meal as Jesus does for His followers.

The biblical description describes the Roman symposium. Jesus and the disciples were engaging in a Roman symposium, or "dinner club." When you engage in the Eucharist, either you're not doing it in the way the bible describes, or you're participating in something that is taken directly from a Pagan ritual.
They were inside the guest room and partake the Passover with His disciples. As simple as that. Where is the Roman symposium or dinner club? Do they have club as written here in the Scripture with Jesus?
Explain it briefly your theory that it is from pagan, please prove it to me.

Luke 22:11-20
11. "And you shall say to the owner of the house, `The Teacher says to you, "Where is the guest room in which I may eat the Passover with My disciples?"'
12. "And he will show you a large, furnished, upper room; prepare it there."
13. And they departed and found everything just as He had told them; and they prepared the Passover.

The Lord's Supper
14. And when the hour had come He reclined at the table, and the apostles with Him.
15. And He said to them, "I have earnestly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer;
16. for I say to you, I shall never again eat it until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of God."
17. And when He had taken a cup and given thanks, He said, "Take this and share it among yourselves;
18. for I say to you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine from now on until the kingdom of God comes."
19. And when He had taken some bread and given thanks, He broke it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me."
20. And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, "This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.

That "recalling" is understood as more than a simple memory recall, though. The ancient usage indicates that it pulls the past event into the present.
recall
verb re·call \ri-ˈkȯl\
: to remember (something) from the past
: to ask or order (someone) to return
: to ask people to return (a product with a defect or problem)

I don't have any problem with it pulls the past event into the present. Their Last Supper is really a past event and applied to serve as a recall or remembrance. There is no difference between the two words.

Thanks
 
Last edited:

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
The Father (God) and Jesus Christ unity in plan and missions cannot be compared with yoga.
The passage isn't about "unity in plan." It's about sacred communion. Yoga seeks the same communion that we are to find with the Divine in our own worship. The forms are different, the objective is similar.
I believed that this is a twisted interpretation.
I believe you're wrong.
Did Jesus taught us to practice yoga or exercises like breathing technique, posture, concentration on one a light etc…..?
Jesus didn't teach any procedure. He taught concepts and objectives. He taught the whys, not the specific hows.
Did reunite is the same as becoming one with God?
Yes.
Is this only applicable with Jesus (Son of God) and the Father?
No.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
He became an instructor of mysticism/meditation for 6 years, how can you say that he is suffering from psychiatric orders. An instructor for 6 years? Absolutely not that reason. He tried it, tested it and experience it.
Ooooh! Six whole years! I've been practicing meditation for over 30 years, and have taught it for over 10. Who's more of an "expert?"
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Can you give your source of reference and show it to that anamnesis does not mean remembrance?
You didn't pay any attention to what I said. I said that it means "remembrance," just not in the way you imagine.
Exactly! sharing that meal as Jesus does for His followers.
Sharing the very same meal that they shared. The very same meal. Not a new meal, not a different meal, not a representative meal. The bread you and I break on Sunday morning is the very same bread Jesus broke 2000+ years ago.
They were inside the guest room and partake the Passover with His disciples. As simple as that. Where is the Roman symposium or dinner club?
The symposium was a ritualized social event in Roman culture. The large Roman house consisted of such a "guest room," or "dining room," specifically made for the purpose of having these dinner parties. You quote:
"And he will show you a large, furnished, upper room; prepare it there."
The "furnishings" were stone couches, placed around the walls of the room. When people ate, they reclined on these couches, in order of social importance. The host was on the first couch, with the next person at his right, and so on down the line. (See Mark 14:18 and Matt. 26:20)
Then you quote:
And when He had taken a cup and given thanks, He said, "Take this and share it among yourselves;
18. for I say to you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine from now on until the kingdom of God comes."
This is the section of the dinner party known as the libation. It's a "toast" of sorts. It celebrates the wine. The libation was not part of the meal proper, but a separate act. That's why, in the story, Jesus lifts the cup twice -- once for the libation, and once for the meal proper.
I don't have any problem with it pulls the past event into the present. Their Last Supper is really a past event and applied it to serve as a recall or remembrance. There is no difference between the two words.
IOW, the past event becomes the present event. Their "Last Supper" is what we are sitting down to eat in the Eucharist. The Last Supper isn't a "past event." It's an ongoing event that each of us through the ages participates in, in our own time, because of anamnesis.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
I posted this testimony to show the informative things about yoga practices plus the experience of a practitioner which I’m still haven’t show it to you (before). The Scripture that I posted before are considered biblical. By the way, we are on track with Windwalker tackling about yoga and mantra. I just need to show this to prove my point of sharing with my friend’s experience with yoga.

Thanks
The post proves nothing. Except that the guy is a neophyte with a poor track record.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Could we be like Jesus as fully God and human?
Yes.
Therefore if any man is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.
IOW, the fullness of humanity becomes the Divine nature.
Sherif Michael practiced mantra yoga (meditated silently on a supposedly “meaningless” sound which was really the vehicle that drew him into a “Hindu” deity or really a demon from our Christian perspective). He was in bondage to this, in combination with hatha yoga for six years. According to his testimony this was a horrible experience for him. Yoga involvement is really an exercise in a demonic activity which is portrayed as “fun” and “healthy” that can lead to demonic possession. He experienced different states of sensory consciousness which were dark and sterile until Jesus set him free.

Yes, it was not for him because he’s awakened with the truth of Jesus.
I've practiced mysticism for over 30 years, and I've been awakened with Jesus. Seems my 30+ years trump his six, in terms of testimony.
What?:eek: I may sing the Lord’s Prayer and recite it once as reading it. Is there anything that is lacking with the Lord’s Prayer? Can you explain to me how to pray using the Lord’s Prayer?

I don’t see anything that I violated in praying as I followed the way on how Jesus instructed us the Lord’s Prayer.
I didn't say that you "violated" anything. I said that you were willing to treat the teaching of the Lord's Prayer as "an example of how to pray," not as "the thing to pray." Yet, you seem unwilling to treat other texts as examples or inferences of what is being done, rather than as precise records of specific acts.
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
But Jesus came to establish a love community. Therefore, none of us has the full truth individually. The full truth may only be realized in community.
Yes, it is love. The love that came from the Father who sent His Son to give the hope of eternal salvation. That love is the love that was given to all so people can come to God, offering, surrendering and dedicating their lives to Jesus Christ. Yes, we really don't have that truth that Jesus is claiming as He is the truth. The community has a free-will if they will obey and commit their life totally to Christ. I believed God like 100% commitment (complete) and not half-heart commitment to do His will as denying oneself for Christ.

"Evil" is an ethical state, not a being. Evil is an act that separates, or that sunders someone in some way.
So there is no evil spirit or spirit being? How about those Jesus rebuke and demon possessed incident in the Scripture? What are those things? act of people, mimicking as evil?

Metaphor. It's all metaphor. Revelation is a dream. Dreams are highly metaphorical.
The Revelation of Jesus Christ
1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him to show to His bond-servants, the things which must shortly take place; and He sent and communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John,
2. who bore witness to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to all that he saw.
3. Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the words of the prophecy, and heed the things which are written in it; for the time is near.

If it is a dream, how come it says here He sent and communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John? A prophecy is a dream, Daniel interpreted the dream of a King, that dream transpired.

Nope. But keep trying. It's entertaining watching you bumble around in the dark trying to label me, just so you can discredit me.
Not to discredit you, I would like to know your stand because of your phrase God is all.

It's poetry -- not reality.
All Psalms is not true because it is poetry, how about David's utterance of his words to God, not true?

Claims are a dime a dozen. How is that love shown to us?
Absolutely! But you said they all have love and no exception to all belief and faiths. You have no distinction at all but a universal love. How do you reconcile that?

Thanks
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
He became an instructor of mysticism/meditation for 6 years, how can you say that he is suffering from psychiatric orders. An instructor for 6 years? Absolutely not that reason. He tried it, tested it and experience it. What more you can say.
Very well I read carefully what you shared from this person. And I will take the time to demonstrate to you how everything I have been saying directly applies to him.

First of all, I did not say he has a mental illness. If you had been reading carefully the many times I posted it it, I said repeatedly that SOME people have bad experiences, and that may be caused due to having psychiatric disorders, OR they may not be really ready for it. Considering what this individual posts as his negative experiences, I can tell you he was NOT a candidate for it. He was either doing things either incorrectly and approaching it with the wrong intentions and wrong understandings, or it was not the correct practice for him.

First where he is correct. Yoga is tied to spiritual practice. I agree that those who use it for a "California beautiful" physical exercise are really missing its deeper intents. Though while they do their poses and whatnot, they do derive positive benefits most of the time for their minds and bodies, even though they are not directly focused upon creating these mystical states. It happens naturally, just like those who are runners, long-distance bikers, many who play golf regularly, and other physical activities which create these nondual flow states.

Where you are incorrect in your interpretation of "that which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of spirit is spirit", is that there is NOT a divorce between spirituality and physicality. That is a bad interpretation of what is meant in that verse, and it does not match the reality of our mind, body, and spirit interconnectivity. The Bible clearly teaches that what the mind thinks, for instance, directly affects the spirit and affects the body. I could give countless verses that indicate this, "As a man thinks in his heart, so is he" "Set your mind on things above", etc. So a true yoga practice is about engaging body, mind, and spirit. That's all it is.

Now to where this person falls off the edge. I cannot spend the time dissecting everything wrong within his article, such as citing someone from Rev Sung Myong Moon's Unification Church, or citing Christian apologists as sources of authority, but I will take his most obvious points one by one to demonstrate and educate you about this. If you know this person personally, as you called him your friend, please invite him to enter this discussion and I'll be happy to go into more detail in the errors contained in his article:

From Personal Experience
For this author more persuasive than any authority is the author’s personal experience in mantra yoga, hatha yoga, and kundalini yoga.
I wish to point out something to you which you disallow in us, citing our personal experience. Please note your friend says "More persuasive than any authority is the author’s personal experience". When I cite my personal experience, you demand it be completely subjected to your interpretation of scripture. But the author is correct, his personal experience does in fact have weight.

Where he falls off the edge is because he thinks his individual experience he had, will be the same for everyone else in the world! This is clearly a false analogy. Like Sojourner said, just because he had a bad experience, doesn't mean it's wrong for everyone else. I have positive experiences with meditation, but I do not make his mistake and assume my positive experience will be everyone else's. I'm wiser than that.

However, these states of consciousness while initially anesthetic became with constant yoga practice progressively more oppressive resulting in a disassociation from the external world. Sensory input was accentuated and produced an overreaction to external stimuli resulting in anxiety. On intensive asana-meditation courses the author experienced several blackouts during mantra meditation sessions which lasted up to an hour and a half. No consciousness of elapsed time and no memory of what had transpired during the blackout existed after such an experience.
Wow. Yes, he was clearly doing it wrong. This should not happen, and when it does, it means you're either doing it wrong, or you were not a good candidate for the practice. Blackouts? Increased anxiety? I've already talked about "sinking mind", where you essentially "blank out", as being a problem in your meditation and an indication you are doing something wrong! But what about this "increased anxiety"? Let's look at that specifically.

A simple Google search will bring you to this article, which supports everything I have said about the potential problems of meditation for certain individuals (again, certain individuals does not translate into everybody on earth). Please read this article from Mental Health Daily: http://mentalhealthdaily.com/2015/03/14/when-meditation-worsens-depression-or-anxiety/

There is certainly a lot of good that can come about from consistent meditation assuming you are a person that responds well to the practice. That said, when dealing with severe forms of depression and/or anxiety, it is important to proceed with caution. In many cases certain types of meditation can amplify depression by increasing slow brain waves in certain regions. In other cases certain types of meditation can cause a relaxation-induced anxiety or may heighten your awareness to an uncomfortable extent.

Before you proceed with black and white thinking that meditation is either good for a person or bad for a person, it is important to consider each person’s individual experience. Factors such as the type of meditation, frequency and duration of the sessions, whether the person is using proper technique, etc. – can all influence outcomes resulting from the practice.
This is where me speaking with your friend would bring out more details of his practice, what was he hoping to find, what was he looking for, what was he doing, what is his personal history, and so forth. I know I read another one of these, "I had a bad experience, therefore the practice is demonic" sorts of black and white thinking fear-projecting articles, and that individual was big into "experience seeking", as we call it, building a wooden pyramid to enhance the cosmic energies in his New Age thrill seeking escapist practice. When he encountered the face of Fear, opening its mouth to swallow him whole, as he put it, he ran off into religious fanaticism, saying much of what your friend is here in the rest of his article.

Meditation and yoga in many instances cause anxiety disorder. This author’s experience is that the techniques result in feelings of unreality, feelings of personality disintegration, and depression. It is the author’s belief that many of the so-called “advanced states of consciousness” are no more than the result of extreme sensitization, a state in which our nerves react in an exaggerated way to stress induced by the yoga/meditation techniques, producing an overshadowing sensory unreality similar to those induced by consciousness altering drugs.
Yes, it can for certain individuals, and therefore you shouldn't do those techniques if that's what's happening, or seek out the guidance of a professional who understands individuals and will guide them into a correct practice for them, or tell them they are not a good candidate. This is the problem with your New Age world you like to say I'm a part of it. They dabble in stuff over the surfaces, not understanding the depth, or the wisdom of engaging in something in the first place. There's always a danger when novices get their hands on what was previously only taught to those who were ready for it. They become like those religious novice/hacks who read a Bible and think they know what God is! :) Your friend taught this for six years, not understanding so many things about it, and not having positive benefit? Something is deeply wrong here. There are many terrible teachers out there, and I tend to think based on all he says in his article he was certainly never really qualified, much the way you aren't as a Bible teacher.

As far as his belief that the "advanced states of consciousness" are "overshadowing sensory" reality, this is just speculative nonsense. His entire reasoning process is suspect, considering he starts with his bad experience, and doesn't bother to weigh anything in the balance against it in his pronouncements of it's "all wrong". I can tell you as someone who in fact does have these "advanced states", of the subtle, causal, and the nondual, they are anything but what he imagines they are. And my experience does in fact count. I just weigh it with reason in looking at his and others experience, both positive and negative. He does not such a reasonable thing, and like you does not listen to others, having his mind made up in his own opinions held as facts, apparently.

I'm going to leave it there for now, and may come back to dissect the rest of this "ace in hole" citation you were saving for us. Again, it only underscores everything I have openly spoke about earlier.
 
Last edited:

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
So there is no evil spirit or spirit being? How about those Jesus rebuke and demon possessed incident in the Scripture? What are those things?
Stories.
If it is a dream, how come it says here He sent and communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John? A prophecy is a dream, Daniel interpreted the dream of a King, that dream transpired.
Dreams are highly metaphorical. Daniel is also not an account of an "actual event." It, too, is a story.
Not to discredit you, I would like to know your stand because of your phrase God is all.
Good luck.
All Psalms is not true because it is poetry, how about David's utterance of his words to God, not true?
Probably not historically, no.
Absolutely! But you said they all have love and no exception to all belief and faiths. You have no distinction at all but a universal love. How do you reconcile that?
I don't need to "reconcile" it to anything. Love is love. Love is universal. Love is unconditional. The ways in which that love is conceived and represented are unimportant.
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
The passage isn't about "unity in plan." It's about sacred communion. Yoga seeks the same communion that we are to find with the Divine in our own worship. The forms are different, the objective is similar.
So you are saying that sacred communion to whom? Who is that Divine?
A Hindu , Buddhist or TM who practiced yoga do the communion to whom? Jesus Christ (Christianity)?
May I ask you the origin/history of yoga practices?

I believe you're wrong.
It is better that you give your details of proof that I’m wrong.

The Bible does not mention or recognize yoga or any system where man can become one with God.by Yoshua
Yes it does. The bible has Jesus state, "The Father and I are one." Jesus also states that "Those who eat my flesh abide in me, and I in them." The whole biblical idea of reconciliation is to reunite humanity with Divinity.By Sojourner

John 10:25-26
25. Jesus answered them, "I told you, and you do not believe; the works that I do in My Father's name, these bear witness of Me.
26. "But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep.

Am I wrong if Jesus answered that He is doing the works in Father’s name and bear witness of Jesus?

Using “I and the Father are one” to support yoga as communion with God is wrong. There is no hint of Jesus introducing a yoga practices as the plan of the Father through His Son Jesus. I’m absolutely sure of that.

John 6:56-57
56. "He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.
57. "As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also shall live because of Me.

Now, you are using the metaphor of Jesus statement, while for Psalm and Revelation, you disregard them as truth because it is a poetry—and the Revelation is just a dream. There is already bias of understanding as I see it from you.

Anyway, we get back to John 6:56, this is still the same—with no introduction of yoga as communion with God. Then the Protestants (now) practiced yoga as the pre-requisite for Christianity. You pick up the terminology/phrase of John 10:30 & John 6:56 and paste it to support yoga as communion with God. I believed this is very blatant and obvious proof text, which scholars cannot accept this kind of interpretation.

Rom. 5:10
10. For if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.

2 Cor. 5:18-21
18. Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ, and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,
19. namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.
20. Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were entreating through us; we beg you on behalf of Christ, be reconciled to God.
21. He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

The focus is reconciliation of man to God through/or in behalf of Christ. Nothing more! How did yoga came to the Scripture? yoga is a man-made practice as having consciousness with a divine being (as claimed). Not part of the doctrine or teaching of Christ nor the gospel stated in the Scripture.

Jesus didn't teach any procedure. He taught concepts and objectives. He taught the whys, not the specific hows.
If there is "no procedure and hows," why practice a certain man-made practices. Can you prove the concepts and objectives, and defend it with supporting Scripture?

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
Ooooh! Six whole years! I've been practicing meditation for over 30 years, and have taught it for over 10. Who's more of an "expert?"
Sojourner,

We are discussing about "psychiatric disorders" as stated by Windwalkers, so if that person spent six years in yoga meditation and become an instructor. How can people followed him as their instructor? Logical.

By the way, you may know how he is associated with other people if you would like to check more of the testified detail in earthharvest.org.

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
Sharing the very same meal that they shared. The very same meal. Not a new meal, not a different meal, not a representative meal. The bread you and I break on Sunday morning is the very same bread Jesus broke 2000+ years ago.
Ok. Literally, it is not the very same bread as they had during their time. Logically, we do this because Jesus did this to His followers as a remembrance for Him. If you mean that it is magically turned into the real bread same as during Jesus time, it is like transubstantiation as becoming & transforming as the real blood and body of Christ.
Is that what you mean?

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
The symposium was a ritualized social event in Roman culture. The large Roman house consisted of such a "guest room," or "dining room," specifically made for the purpose of having these dinner parties. You quote:
Ok how about this source, is this wrong?

According to later tradition, the Last Supper took place in what is today called The Room of the Last Supper on Mount Zion, just outside of the walls of the Old City of Jerusalem, and is traditionally known as The Upper Room. This is based on the account in the Synoptic Gospels that states that Jesus had instructed a pair of unnamed disciples to go to "the city" to meet "a man carrying a jar of water", who would lead them to a house, where they would find "a large upper room furnished and ready".[Mark 14:13-15] In this upper room they "prepare the Passover".wikipedia

What it has to do with the Lord’s Supper and the place as the Roman symposium to pagan practices?

IOW, the past event becomes the present event. Their "Last Supper" is what we are sitting down to eat in the Eucharist. The Last Supper isn't a "past event." It's an ongoing event that each of us through the ages participates in, in our own time, because of anamnesis.
So, what do you mean it becomes the present event? What does it signifies?

The Last Supper is truly an event done by Jesus Christ with His disciples. We considered as followers of Christ, therefore as Jesus did this by saying “do this in remembrance of me,” we also did this.

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
Could we be like Jesus as fully God and human?By Yoshua

How can we be like Jesus as fully God? Please explain.
I've practiced mysticism for over 30 years, and I've been awakened with Jesus. Seems my 30+ years trump his six, in terms of testimony.
Your awakening with Jesus and Sherif Michael are not the same. He stopped practicing yoga practices, seeking mysticism, and instead focused with the truth that Jesus had.

Here is the article by Ray Yungen regarding mysticism :

Does God Sanction Mystical Experiences?

By Ray Yungen
For many years during my research, I would come across the term contemplative prayer. Immediately I would dismiss any thought that it had a New Age connotation because I thought it meant to ponder while praying--which would be the logical association with that term. But in the New Age disciplines, things are not always what they seem to be to untrained ears. What contemplative prayer actually entails is described very clearly by the following writer:

When one enters the deeper layers of contemplative prayer one sooner or later experiences the void, the emptiness, the nothingness ... the profound mystical silence ... an absence of thought.1

To my dismay, I discovered this "mystical silence" is accomplished by the same methods used by New Agers to achieve their silence--the mantra and the breath! Contemplative prayer is the repetition of what is referred to as a prayer word or sacred word until one reaches a state where the soul, rather than the mind, contemplates God. Contemplative prayer teacher and Zen master Willigis Jager brought this out when he postulated:

Do not reflect on the meaning of the word; thinking and reflecting must cease, as all mystical writers insist. Simply "sound" the word silently, letting go of all feelings and thoughts.2

One of the most well-known writings on the subject is the classic 14th century treatise, The Cloud of Unknowing, written by an anonymous author. It is essentially a manual on contemplative prayer inviting a beginner to:

Take just a little word, of one syllable rather than of two . . . With this word you are to strike down every kind of thought under the cloud of forgetting.3

The premise here is that in order to really know God, mysticism must be practiced--the mind has to be shut down or turned off so that the cloud of unknowing where the presence of God awaits can be experienced.

So the question we as Christians must ask ourselves is, "Why not? Why shouldn't we incorporate this mystical prayer practice into our lives?" The answer to this is actually found in Scripture.

While certain instances in the Bible describe mystical experiences, I see no evidence anywhere of God sanctioning man-initiated mysticism. Legitimate mystical experiences were always initiated by God to certain individuals for certain revelations and was never based on a method for the altering of consciousness. In Acts 11:5, Peter fell into a trance while in prayer. But it was God, not Peter, who initiated the trance and facilitated it.

By definition, a mystic, on the other hand, is someone who uses rote methods in an attempt to tap into their inner divinity. Those who use these methods put themselves into a trance state outside of God's sanction or protection and thus engage in an extremely dangerous approach. Besides, nowhere in the Bible are such mystical practices prescribed. For instance, the Lord, for the purpose of teaching people a respect for His holiness and His plans, instated certain ceremonies for His people (especially in the Old Testament). Nonetheless, Scripture contains no reference in which God promoted mystical practices. The gifts of the Spirit spoken of in the New Testament were supernatural in nature but did not fall within the confines of mysticism. God bestowed spiritual gifts without the Christian practicing a method beforehand to get God's response.

Proponents of contemplative prayer would respond with, What about Psalms 46:10? "Be still and know that I am God." This verse is often used by those promoting contemplative prayer. On the surface, this argument can seem valid, but once the meaning of "still" is examined, any contemplative connection is expelled. The Hebrew meaning of the word is to slacken, cease, or abate. In other words, the context is to slow down and trust God rather than get in a dither over things. Relax and watch God work. This isn't talking about going into some altered state of consciousness!

It should also be pointed out that being born again, in and of itself, is mystical. But it is a direct act of God, initiated by Him--the Holy Spirit has regenerated the once-dead spirit of man into a living spirit through Christ. Yet, we notice that even in this most significant of experiences when one is "passed from death into life" (John 5:24), God accomplishes this without placing the individual in an altered state of consciousness.

We can take this a step further by looking at the day of Pentecost recorded in Acts, chapter 2 where those present were "all filled with the Holy Spirit" (vs. 4). Notice that they were "all with one accord in one place" (vs. 1) when the Holy Spirit descended on them. From the context of the chapter, it is safe to assume this was a lively gathering of believers engaged in intelligent conversation. Then, when those present began to speak in other tongues, it was not an episode of mindless babbling or vain repetition as in a mantra. Rather it was an event of coherent speech significant enough to draw a crowd who exclaimed, "we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God" (vs. 11). Other observers who suspected they were in an altered state of consciousness said, "They are full of new wine" (vs. 13). Notice that Peter was quick to correct this group in asserting that they were all fully conscious. Would it not then stand to reason that their minds were not in any kind of altered state? Next, Peter delivered one of the most carefully articulated speeches recorded in Scripture. This was certainly not a group of men in a trance.

So, through the lens of perhaps the two most meaningful mystical experiences recorded in the New Testament (i.e., being born again and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost), an altered state of consciousness was never sought after nor was it achieved. In fact, a complete search of both Old and New Testaments reveals there were only two types of experiences sanctioned by God where the recipient is not fully awake--namely dreams and visions--and in each case the experience is initiated by God. Conversely, every instance of a self-induced trance recorded in Scripture is adamantly condemned by God as we see summarized in the following verses:

When you come into the land which the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. (Deuteronomy 18:9-11)

An examination of the Hebrew meanings of the terms used in the above verses shows that much of what is being spoken of is the invoking of spells. And a spell, used in this context, refers to a trance. In other words, when God induces a trance it is in the form of a dream or a vision. When man induces a trance, it is in the form of a spell or hypnosis.

And remember, nowhere in the Bible is the silence equated with the "power of God," but the message of the cross (1 Corinthians 1:18) most certainly is!

I didn't say that you "violated" anything. I said that you were willing to treat the teaching of the Lord's Prayer as "an example of how to pray," not as "the thing to pray." Yet, you seem unwilling to treat other texts as examples or inferences of what is being done, rather than as precise records of specific acts.
The Lord’s Prayer example “give us this day our daily bread,” what does it say? It says that we ask God for our needs. It does not specifically tell us what you need in our daily life. This Lord’s Prayer is a general guide as how to pray. So I may say that this is not the thing to pray, of course.

Logically, one example if a father needs a job to sustain his family, he used the Lord’s Prayer from the general guide of “give us this day our daily bread” by asking personally from God that he need God to find him a job to sustain his family needs.

But in regards to the mantra and yoga, as applying your objective and concepts, there should be an underlying truth that Jesus gave a general guide to practice yoga as essential for Christian contemplation.

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
Could we be like Jesus as fully God and human?By Yoshua

How can we be like Jesus as fully God? Please explain.
I've practiced mysticism for over 30 years, and I've been awakened with Jesus. Seems my 30+ years trump his six, in terms of testimony.
Your awakening with Jesus and Sherif Michael are not the same. He stopped practicing yoga practices, seeking mysticism, and instead focused with the truth that Jesus had.

Here is the article by Ray Yungen regarding mysticism :

Does God Sanction Mystical Experiences?

By Ray Yungen
For many years during my research, I would come across the term contemplative prayer. Immediately I would dismiss any thought that it had a New Age connotation because I thought it meant to ponder while praying--which would be the logical association with that term. But in the New Age disciplines, things are not always what they seem to be to untrained ears. What contemplative prayer actually entails is described very clearly by the following writer:

When one enters the deeper layers of contemplative prayer one sooner or later experiences the void, the emptiness, the nothingness ... the profound mystical silence ... an absence of thought.1

To my dismay, I discovered this "mystical silence" is accomplished by the same methods used by New Agers to achieve their silence--the mantra and the breath! Contemplative prayer is the repetition of what is referred to as a prayer word or sacred word until one reaches a state where the soul, rather than the mind, contemplates God. Contemplative prayer teacher and Zen master Willigis Jager brought this out when he postulated:

Do not reflect on the meaning of the word; thinking and reflecting must cease, as all mystical writers insist. Simply "sound" the word silently, letting go of all feelings and thoughts.2

One of the most well-known writings on the subject is the classic 14th century treatise, The Cloud of Unknowing, written by an anonymous author. It is essentially a manual on contemplative prayer inviting a beginner to:

Take just a little word, of one syllable rather than of two . . . With this word you are to strike down every kind of thought under the cloud of forgetting.3

The premise here is that in order to really know God, mysticism must be practiced--the mind has to be shut down or turned off so that the cloud of unknowing where the presence of God awaits can be experienced.

So the question we as Christians must ask ourselves is, "Why not? Why shouldn't we incorporate this mystical prayer practice into our lives?" The answer to this is actually found in Scripture.

While certain instances in the Bible describe mystical experiences, I see no evidence anywhere of God sanctioning man-initiated mysticism. Legitimate mystical experiences were always initiated by God to certain individuals for certain revelations and was never based on a method for the altering of consciousness. In Acts 11:5, Peter fell into a trance while in prayer. But it was God, not Peter, who initiated the trance and facilitated it.

By definition, a mystic, on the other hand, is someone who uses rote methods in an attempt to tap into their inner divinity. Those who use these methods put themselves into a trance state outside of God's sanction or protection and thus engage in an extremely dangerous approach. Besides, nowhere in the Bible are such mystical practices prescribed. For instance, the Lord, for the purpose of teaching people a respect for His holiness and His plans, instated certain ceremonies for His people (especially in the Old Testament). Nonetheless, Scripture contains no reference in which God promoted mystical practices. The gifts of the Spirit spoken of in the New Testament were supernatural in nature but did not fall within the confines of mysticism. God bestowed spiritual gifts without the Christian practicing a method beforehand to get God's response.

Proponents of contemplative prayer would respond with, What about Psalms 46:10? "Be still and know that I am God." This verse is often used by those promoting contemplative prayer. On the surface, this argument can seem valid, but once the meaning of "still" is examined, any contemplative connection is expelled. The Hebrew meaning of the word is to slacken, cease, or abate. In other words, the context is to slow down and trust God rather than get in a dither over things. Relax and watch God work. This isn't talking about going into some altered state of consciousness!

It should also be pointed out that being born again, in and of itself, is mystical. But it is a direct act of God, initiated by Him--the Holy Spirit has regenerated the once-dead spirit of man into a living spirit through Christ. Yet, we notice that even in this most significant of experiences when one is "passed from death into life" (John 5:24), God accomplishes this without placing the individual in an altered state of consciousness.

We can take this a step further by looking at the day of Pentecost recorded in Acts, chapter 2 where those present were "all filled with the Holy Spirit" (vs. 4). Notice that they were "all with one accord in one place" (vs. 1) when the Holy Spirit descended on them. From the context of the chapter, it is safe to assume this was a lively gathering of believers engaged in intelligent conversation. Then, when those present began to speak in other tongues, it was not an episode of mindless babbling or vain repetition as in a mantra. Rather it was an event of coherent speech significant enough to draw a crowd who exclaimed, "we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God" (vs. 11). Other observers who suspected they were in an altered state of consciousness said, "They are full of new wine" (vs. 13). Notice that Peter was quick to correct this group in asserting that they were all fully conscious. Would it not then stand to reason that their minds were not in any kind of altered state? Next, Peter delivered one of the most carefully articulated speeches recorded in Scripture. This was certainly not a group of men in a trance.

So, through the lens of perhaps the two most meaningful mystical experiences recorded in the New Testament (i.e., being born again and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost), an altered state of consciousness was never sought after nor was it achieved. In fact, a complete search of both Old and New Testaments reveals there were only two types of experiences sanctioned by God where the recipient is not fully awake--namely dreams and visions--and in each case the experience is initiated by God. Conversely, every instance of a self-induced trance recorded in Scripture is adamantly condemned by God as we see summarized in the following verses:

When you come into the land which the LORD your God is giving you, you shall not learn to follow the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. (Deuteronomy 18:9-11)

An examination of the Hebrew meanings of the terms used in the above verses shows that much of what is being spoken of is the invoking of spells. And a spell, used in this context, refers to a trance. In other words, when God induces a trance it is in the form of a dream or a vision. When man induces a trance, it is in the form of a spell or hypnosis.

And remember, nowhere in the Bible is the silence equated with the "power of God," but the message of the cross (1 Corinthians 1:18) most certainly is!

I didn't say that you "violated" anything. I said that you were willing to treat the teaching of the Lord's Prayer as "an example of how to pray," not as "the thing to pray." Yet, you seem unwilling to treat other texts as examples or inferences of what is being done, rather than as precise records of specific acts.
The Lord’s Prayer example “give us this day our daily bread,” what does it say? It says that we ask God for our needs. It does not specifically tell us what you need in our daily life. This Lord’s Prayer is a general guide as how to pray. So I may say that this is not the thing to pray, of course.

Logically, one example if a father needs a job to sustain his family, he used the Lord’s Prayer from the general guide of “give us this day our daily bread” by asking personally from God that he need God to find him a job to sustain his family needs.

But in regards to the mantra and yoga, as applying your objective and concepts, there should be an underlying truth that Jesus gave a general guide to practice yoga as essential for Christian contemplation.

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
Very well I read carefully what you shared from this person. And I will take the time to demonstrate to you how everything I have been saying directly applies to him.

First of all, I did not say he has a mental illness. If you had been reading carefully the many times I posted it it, I said repeatedly that SOME people have bad experiences, and that may be caused due to having psychiatric disorders, OR they may not be really ready for it. Considering what this individual posts as his negative experiences, I can tell you he was NOT a candidate for it. He was either doing things either incorrectly and approaching it with the wrong intentions and wrong understandings, or it was not the correct practice for him.
Hi Windwalker,

Oh. So if a yoga practitioner stopped practicing and claimed he see the truth about Jesus, he is tagged as not ready, and not for him. Actually, those are not basically the reason. My friend who testified about nightmares in the process of seeking the kundalini, still continued in his practice. Those nightmares and terrifying things that they experience is real, the truth. It’s an awakening call of what is inside that particular practice (yoga). The consequences that Mr. Sherif’s experience gave him a choice to decide whether he will still choose to continue yoga or not.

Still, the light of the Scripture is the topmost basis aside from commenting on someone is not ready or not.
First where he is correct. Yoga is tied to spiritual practice. I agree that those who use it for a "California beautiful" physical exercise are really missing its deeper intents. Though while they do their poses and whatnot, they do derive positive benefits most of the time for their minds and bodies, even though they are not directly focused upon creating these mystical states. It happens naturally, just like those who are runners, long-distance bikers, many who play golf regularly, and other physical activities which create these nondual flow states.
I already on your side about physical exercise as I do exercises but if the so-called exercise is tied with spiritual (as you have said), a person should be acquainted to see the truth inside of the spiritual practices. As I once practiced Tai-chi with my uncle in the past due to my interest of the martial arts. There is the breathing exercise that the “ki” is exercised as power. But as I mature in the word of God, I cannot compromise my faith with the principle of yin & yang. No way to mix the oriental or eastern practices/principles as my testimony to other people saying that I’m a “Christian.”a follower of Christ.

As the Scripture said that we offer our body as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to the Lord.
Where you are incorrect in your interpretation of "that which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of spirit is spirit", is that there is NOT a divorce between spirituality and physicality. That is a bad interpretation of what is meant in that verse, and it does not match the reality of our mind, body, and spirit interconnectivity. The Bible clearly teaches that what the mind thinks, for instance, directly affects the spirit and affects the body. I could give countless verses that indicate this, "As a man thinks in his heart, so is he" "Set your mind on things above", etc. So a true yoga practice is about engaging body, mind, and spirit. That's all it is.
I did not consider it as full interpretation for our discussion. I know that. I used it to let you see how Nicodemus did not understand the word “born again” and he thought it was going inside the womb again and born anew. So Jesus explain it by saying what is flesh is flesh and spiritual is spiritual. I’m pointing out the distinction and the relevance of spiritual side. The soul of a man is more important than physical wherein our flesh return to dust.

Mark 8:36-37
36. "For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world, and forfeit his soul?
37. "For what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

Yoga practice is not setting your mind on Christ but man-made practices. I’m still waiting someone to prove that yoga is a teachings and doctrine of Jesus Christ.
Now to where this person falls off the edge. I cannot spend the time dissecting everything wrong within his article, such as citing someone from Rev Sung Myong Moon's Unification Church, or citing Christian apologists as sources of authority, but I will take his most obvious points one by one to demonstrate and educate you about this. If you know this person personally, as you called him your friend, please invite him to enter this discussion and I'll be happy to go into more detail in the errors contained in his article:

From Personal Experience
For this author more persuasive than any authority is the author’s personal experience in mantra yoga, hatha yoga, and kundalini yoga.
I wish to point out something to you which you disallow in us, citing our personal experience. Please note your friend says "More persuasive than any authority is the author’s personal experience". When I cite my personal experience, you demand it be completely subjected to your interpretation of scripture. But the author is correct, his personal experience does in fact have weight.

Where he falls off the edge is because he thinks his individual experience he had, will be the same for everyone else in the world! This is clearly a false analogy. Like Sojourner said, just because he had a bad experience, doesn't mean it's wrong for everyone else. I have positive experiences with meditation, but I do not make his mistake and assume my positive experience will be everyone else's. I'm wiser than that.

However, these states of consciousness while initially anesthetic became with constant yoga practice progressively more oppressive resulting in a disassociation from the external world. Sensory input was accentuated and produced an overreaction to external stimuli resulting in anxiety. On intensive asana-meditation courses the author experienced several blackouts during mantra meditation sessions which lasted up to an hour and a half. No consciousness of elapsed time and no memory of what had transpired during the blackout existed after such an experience.
Wow. Yes, he was clearly doing it wrong. This should not happen, and when it does, it means you're either doing it wrong, or you were not a good candidate for the practice. Blackouts? Increased anxiety? I've already talked about "sinking mind", where you essentially "blank out", as being a problem in your meditation and an indication you are doing something wrong! But what about this "increased anxiety"? Let's look at that specifically.
Ok. As I said some are awakened and some move on according to their choice. For you with Sojourner, I know both of you have mastered your mystical experience; either good or bad consequences, I cannot wrap it in one and conclude both of you have the same experience with Mr. Sherif. What I started here in this discussion is the authority of the Scripture in relation to your mystical experience. What the Scripture presented in terms of mystical experiences.
A simple Google search will bring you to this article, which supports everything I have said about the potential problems of meditation for certain individuals (again, certain individuals does not translate into everybody on earth). Please read this article from Mental Health Daily: http://mentalhealthdaily.com/2015/03/14/when-meditation-worsens-depression-or-anxiety/

There is certainly a lot of good that can come about from consistent meditation assuming you are a person that responds well to the practice. That said, when dealing with severe forms of depression and/or anxiety, it is important to proceed with caution. In many cases certain types of meditation can amplify depression by increasing slow brain waves in certain regions. In other cases certain types of meditation can cause a relaxation-induced anxiety or may heighten your awareness to an uncomfortable extent.
1 Cor. 6:12
12. All things are lawful for me, but not all things are profitable. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be mastered by anything.
We may be mastered by practices to benefit our body. That is good! But is it benefits our soul?
Before you proceed with black and white thinking that meditation is either good for a person or bad for a person, it is important to consider each person’s individual experience. Factors such as the type of meditation, frequency and duration of the sessions, whether the person is using proper technique, etc. – can all influence outcomes resulting from the practice.
This is where me speaking with your friend would bring out more details of his practice, what was he hoping to find, what was he looking for, what was he doing, what is his personal history, and so forth. I know I read another one of these, "I had a bad experience, therefore the practice is demonic" sorts of black and white thinking fear-projecting articles, and that individual was big into "experience seeking", as we call it, building a wooden pyramid to enhance the cosmic energies in his New Age thrill seeking escapist practice. When he encountered the face of Fear, opening its mouth to swallow him whole, as he put it, he ran off into religious fanaticism, saying much of what your friend is here in the rest of his article.

Meditation and yoga in many instances cause anxiety disorder. This author’s experience is that the techniques result in feelings of unreality, feelings of personality disintegration, and depression. It is the author’s belief that many of the so-called “advanced states of consciousness” are no more than the result of extreme sensitization, a state in which our nerves react in an exaggerated way to stress induced by the yoga/meditation techniques, producing an overshadowing sensory unreality similar to those induced by consciousness altering drugs.
Yes, it can for certain individuals, and therefore you shouldn't do those techniques if that's what's happening, or seek out the guidance of a professional who understands individuals and will guide them into a correct practice for them, or tell them they are not a good candidate. This is the problem with your New Age world you like to say I'm a part of it. They dabble in stuff over the surfaces, not understanding the depth, or the wisdom of engaging in something in the first place. There's always a danger when novices get their hands on what was previously only taught to those who were ready for it. They become like those religious novice/hacks who read a Bible and think they know what God is! :) Your friend taught this for six years, not understanding so many things about it, and not having positive benefit? Something is deeply wrong here. There are many terrible teachers out there, and I tend to think based on all he says in his article he was certainly never really qualified, much the way you aren't as a Bible teacher.
I think that perception of yours ‘to think those religious novice know what God is’ is not an excuse to remove ourselves from the word of God. No way! If somebody gave me a Scripture and tell me that my practices are wrong and not in line with the word, the approach would be to seek and check the validity in the Scriptures. It depends on the approach and reception of a person who hear the word of God. Either he will take it seriously or set it aside as without priority.

Matt. 13:3-9
3. And He spoke many things to them in parables, saying, "Behold, the sower went out to sow;
4. and as he sowed, some seeds fell beside the road, and the birds came and ate them up.
5. "And others fell upon the rocky places, where they did not have much soil; and immediately they sprang up, because they had no depth of soil.
6. "But when the sun had risen, they were scorched; and because they had no root, they withered away.
7. "And others fell among the thorns, and the thorns came up and choked them out.
8. "And others fell on the good soil, and yielded a crop, some a hundredfold, some sixty, and some thirty.
9. "He who has ears, let him hear."

Thanks
 

Yoshua

Well-Known Member
So there is no evil spirit or spirit being? How about those Jesus rebuke and demon possessed incident in the Scripture? What are those things?By Yoshua

Do you mean that the narrative pertaining to Jesus and the demoniacs is just a stories and not a real fact that transpired in Jesus time?
Dreams are highly metaphorical. Daniel is also not an account of an "actual event." It, too, is a story.
Oh my, maybe you are saying a TRUE story. Right?

Thanks
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Oh. So if a yoga practitioner stopped practicing and claimed he see the truth about Jesus, he is tagged as not ready, and not for him.
I would say that if those were his experiences he was either not doing it right, or they were not the right practices for him for whatever reason. They are not the normal experiences. They are considered a problem with the practice for that person. Not normal. That he finally gave up on what he was doing is good, if that was what it was doing for him! But then to teach others that the truth of Yoga equals his own experiences, as if that speaks for the whole of what it is, is simply flawed and faulty thinking, an immaturity, as well as being irresponsible to the truth and to others.

Let me offer a story to you an example.

Chapter One: A Christian fundamentalist spends his life dedicated to preaching and teaching the bible, believing the earth is 6000 years old, and all the stories of the bible are literal scientific facts of history, geology, and cosmology. But believing such things literally is conflicting with his mind of reason and rationality when confronted with the sensible data that is done by those who are specialists in these fields. It causes inner turmoil for him, anxieties, fears he is losing his faith. He continues on nonetheless, preaching and teaching even harder than before to fight against the devil of disbelief knocking at his door, trying to discredit the scientists in order to maintain his beliefs.

Eventually, after many years of this inner tug-of-war, he finally lets go of his beliefs of such things as a 6000 year old earth, that evolution did not create the species, and so forth. His "faith" goes into crisis and he ends up turning his back entirely on all that he once believed and becomes a committed Atheist, citing all the Atheist apologists, Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, et. al. He is disillusioned and hurt, and is angry now. He blames religion, and says religion is the great evil. His experiences define what he sees religion as, the source of this problem for him, and sees that now it is his calling to save others from the great Satan called religion.

He becomes versed in everything about where religion is wrong by reading these authorities of Atheism who research out and specialize in debunking the bible and the myth of God. He is confident in their voices because they are so well-versed in the subject and what they say matches his own bad experiences with it! He becomes an ardent atheist apologist, and viewed as a "specialist" in the subject of religion because of his history and current knowledge of the arguments proving religion is evil. He is rewarded by those who likewise hate religion for whatever reason and a voice reflecting their own fears and ignorance of what religion is.

Now for many, the story ends there. They have found their new belief system, a replacement for what they walked away from which they once placed all their hopes and identities in.

But for some others, the journey continues into a Chapter Two, where they begin to realize it is not a black and white thing, where religion is either The Truth, or the Great Satan. Their black and white thinking begins to loosen and allow light to penetrate in, recognizing the difference between individual experiences, and the way in which we understand the truth of things is relative to the person's growth and maturity, as well as their own experiences, as well as considering other points of view and their view not held as supremely true over all others. They see that religion is not just this one thing over here, and they recognize the good in it for others, while also recognizing its pitfalls and dangers as well. And this then continues and moves into a Chapter Three, and then later a Chapter Four, and Five, Six, and Seven, etc, as they continue to mature and grow. ~ The End.

From what I hear of your friend in regard to his experience with his Yoga practices, he is in at the end of Chapter One in the above story (just substitute whatever system someone "believed in". The story is universal). He takes his experience as defining what Yoga is as a whole, the "Great Satan" in the story above. This assessment of Yoga and meditation is reflective of the person, not the practice itself, just as in my story above. It lacks any balance of reason, and is reactionary, simply switching out one religious belief, hope, for another.

I'll give you a last example of this in reality. A friend of mine who was a graduate with me from Bible College had become an atheist in later years and said to me while we were out at lunch, "I'm so glad I know the truth now!". I chuckled and smiled at him and said, "It's funny, I recall you saying the exact same words when we were in school together." He paused for a moment, then replied, "But the difference is now I really DO have the truth!". :) Sounds like your friend.

I'll continue my response later, but I have break for now.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
So you are saying that sacred communion to whom? Who is that Divine?
A Hindu , Buddhist or TM who practiced yoga do the communion to whom? Jesus Christ (Christianity)?
Sacred communion with the Divine.
Am I wrong if Jesus answered that He is doing the works in Father’s name and bear witness of Jesus?
That's not cogent to the argument.
Using “I and the Father are one” to support yoga as communion with God is wrong. There is no hint of Jesus introducing a yoga practices as the plan of the Father through His Son Jesus. I’m absolutely sure of that.

John 6:56-57
56. "He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.
57. "As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also shall live because of Me.

Now, you are using the metaphor of Jesus statement, while for Psalm and Revelation, you disregard them as truth because it is a poetry—and the Revelation is just a dream. There is already bias of understanding as I see it from you.

Anyway, we get back to John 6:56, this is still the same—with no introduction of yoga as communion with God. Then the Protestants (now) practiced yoga as the pre-requisite for Christianity. You pick up the terminology/phrase of John 10:30 & John 6:56 and paste it to support yoga as communion with God. I believed this is very blatant and obvious proof text, which scholars cannot accept this kind of interpretation.
I didn't say that the early Christians practiced Yoga. Don't deflect the argument. I said that the intent of Yoga is communion with the Divine, and that communion with the Divine is also a Christian tenet. As has been stated before, there are many roads to the same destination. You're arguing that Christians don't drive on Route 66, that they drive on I-10. I'm saying that both roads go to Los Angeles.
If there is "no procedure and hows," why practice a certain man-made practices. Can you prove the concepts and objectives, and defend it with supporting Scripture?
We've stated before that we don't have to. Not everything is spelled out in scripture, and I don't intend to be constrained to some arbitrary, heretical boundary. Sola scriptura is a farce.
 
Top