That would be pretty near the bottom of the "unfair things in the Bible" list, IMO.Don't you think it's a bit unfair to require something from new testament believers, that wasn't required of old testament believers?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That would be pretty near the bottom of the "unfair things in the Bible" list, IMO.Don't you think it's a bit unfair to require something from new testament believers, that wasn't required of old testament believers?
That would be pretty near the bottom of the "unfair things in the Bible" list, IMO.
Can someone tell me which one is the correct formula of salvation?
A. FAITH = SALVATION, then the evidence is WORKS
B. FAITH + WORKS = SALVATION
Thanks ...
How exactly was the slaughtering of the first-born of Egypt, for instance, the fault of capitalism? Did the Egyptians not pay God enough money?Yes, but that is the fault of capitalism.
If I had to choose one of those options, I'd go with 'B'. In reality, there's a bit more to it than that.Can someone tell me which one is the correct formula of salvation?
A. FAITH = SALVATION, then the evidence is WORKS
B. FAITH + WORKS = SALVATION
Thanks ...
Don't you think it's a bit unfair to require something from new testament believers, that wasn't required of old testament believers?
If you're asking me...it seems unfair to the Old Testament believers...don't you realize that they had to observe 613 Commandments? How many do the New have? We have it ALOT easier!!!!
Can someone tell me which one is the correct formula of salvation?
A. FAITH = SALVATION, then the evidence is WORKS
B. FAITH + WORKS = SALVATION
Thanks ...
Funny... I've run into many Christians who have said that the only thing that saves is God's grace.Only A works. Theologically, this is the way how salvation is defined in the Covenant, that is, faith alone saves.
Ultimately, it is. Even though I believe, for instance that we are saved by a combination of faith and works, if God were to choose to say, "I've changed my mind. You have faith and you've been really obedience all your life, but I just don't feel like forgiving you and so I'm not going to," He could. People confuse faith and grace. Faith is a belief in something without hard evidence of its reality. Grace is unmerited divine assistance. Grace actually saves us apart from both faith and works because God is under no obligation to extend it to us.Funny... I've run into many Christians who have said that the only thing that saves is God's grace.
Why would you doubt Him?JESUS SAYS IN MARK 16:16 hE THAT BELIEVETH AND IS BAPTIZED SHALL BE SAVED. NOW THE QUESTION IS WAS JESUS TELLING THE TRUTH?
JESUS SAYS IN MARK 16:16 hE THAT BELIEVETH AND IS BAPTIZED SHALL BE SAVED. NOW THE QUESTION IS WAS JESUS TELLING THE TRUTH?
JESUS SAYS IN MARK 16:16 hE THAT BELIEVETH AND IS BAPTIZED SHALL BE SAVED. NOW THE QUESTION IS WAS JESUS TELLING THE TRUTH?
He also says in Matthew 19:21 "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." Was Jesus telling the truth?
I hear the argument a lot about all you have to do to be saved is to call upon the name of the Lord and believe and trust him with all of your heart and you will be saved. Yes I think that's an important stage but don't you think that's too easy to just believe and say that you're saved and that God wants more from us than that? In James 2:18-20 it says But someone will say, “You have faith, and I have works.” Show me your faith without your works, and I will show you my faith by my works. 19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe—and tremble! 20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead? That right there shows that we need to show our works and obey him. The reason I've been looking at this more closely is I know a lot of people who don't think they need to be baptized for the remission of their sins where it clearly states it in Acts 2:38 where it says Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. You can go throughout the New Testament too and find many examples of people being baptized including Jesus himself (Matthew 3).
What about the thief on the cross? Did he have any works? Was he baptized?
Why would He require one group of people to be baptized and not another, particularly since it's not a difficult commandment to obey? The last thing He told His Apostles before ascending into Heaven was, "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." That sounds to me like the "set group of people" that was supposed to be baptized was "all nations."Also, how do you know that when Jesus told a set group of people that they must be baptized to be saved, it was a general instruction for all of humanity and not a specific instruction for those individual people? You can only make an inference one way or the other with some sort of idea about what Jesus meant, and I think that the question of why God would want baptism is relevant to figuring out what Jesus did mean. No?