idea
Question Everything
Friend idea,
Just read your post and like to say that you have described happiness in the best manner through your experience.
That is fine.
What is important to understand is that when you are talking of happiness then the other pole or 8UNhappiness* too is created by default. Both are true and REAL. For a buddha it is to be in the middle not on either side of the pendulum. Life is like the swing of a pendulum between happiness and unhappiness and buddhas though they go through the motions in totality but do not identify themselves with either. They always remain in the middle when the pendulum is neither in the zone of happiness or unhappiness. That is BALANCE. That is when your karma does not have any carry forward as you are not accepting any results or rather not attached to either results be it good or bad.
That is what may be called a state of permanent bliss or happiness.
Love & rgds
I agree that opposites define one another – it is the theory of relativity, reference frames of a sort is needed for existence. Good, evil, happy, sad – these are all relative terms, and do not exist except in comparison to something else. No sad, no happy, no evil, no good. The LDS faith celebrates Adam and Eve eating the fruit for this reason. If they had not eaten the fruit, they would not have understood good, for there would have been no evil. God did not allow them to have children until they ate the fruit because they would not be able to teach their children anything without understanding good and evil. Here is a scripture out of the book of Moses:
Pearl of Great Price - Moses5
11 And Eve, his wife, heard all these things and was glad, saying: Were it not for our transgression we never should have had seed, and never should have known good and evil, and the joy of our redemption, and the eternal life which God giveth unto all the obedient.
12 And Adam and Eve blessed the name of God, and they made all things known unto their sons and their daughters.
I do not however think that life has to remain in a pendulum state – once you fall and learn what evil is, if you can remember what it is, you do not have to keep falling. CS Lewis said something like:
“You know the strength of something
by standing up and fighting against it,
not by laying down and letting it overpower you.”
by standing up and fighting against it,
not by laying down and letting it overpower you.”
It is Jesus then – who was perfect and did not have any evil in him, who was able to stand up and fight against it all, that has the greatest understanding of what good and evil are. If you stay in the middle, you will not fully understand the depth of it all. You have to fully immerse yourself in one side or the other before you can gain a true understanding.
opposition in all things scripture: vs 2:11-16
We would say "let go of the natural man" to let go of desires and wants - thus becoming spiritually reborn - Not being attached I think is the same as saying leave it in God's hands, not my will but thine be done - God frees us from having to worry about it all. Sin would be trying to force our will ahead of Gods, best to just go with the flow, stop trying to control everything, and let God’s will reign. As God is the organizer, following His will is going with the natural flow. Anything else is going to be an unhappy fight. I think it is funny when people think Christians live restrictive lives – rules of how to live – it is not to confine you, but rather to point you in the direction of the natural flow of things. Buddhism / Taoism teaches to find the natural flow of things and go with it right? That is what Christians teach too.
Question - is balance to some times fight against the stream, some times to go with it, and other times to stand in the middle doing nothing? Or is a happy balanced life to just continually go with the flow? I have never heard a Buddihst teach anything but seeking to go with the flow... to "identify" themself with the natural flow, and not with their own will....