Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
When I got married, I thought I new what love was. I was married for nearly 6 years, but now separated.
So now I'm asking the question, What is love (in the context of spousal relationships)?
Thoughts welcome.
We can get into if love is supposed to last a lifetime but that usually gets into religious concepts (nothing wrong with that) and personal standards.
When I got married, I thought I new what love was. I was married for nearly 6 years, but now separated.
So now I'm asking the question, What is love (in the context of spousal relationships)?
Thoughts welcome.
It's interesting that historically, love and/or sexual attraction was not a prerequisite for marriage, at least not when it came to women. Women used to have no choice on who they would marry. Nowadays, women would probably not marry unless there was some sexual attraction and love for the man. It's amazing how society has such a powerful affect on how we feel and live - it almost seems natural (genetic, inherent) but much of it is not.
When I got married, I thought I new what love was. I was married for nearly 6 years, but now separated.
So now I'm asking the question, What is love (in the context of spousal relationships)?
Thoughts welcome.
Sorry to hear that. May all be well.
In Brihadaraynaka Upanishad there is a talk between sage Yajnavalkya and his wife Maitreyi. That talk is, for me (and possibly for many others), the last word on any kind of love. You may wish to read.
A Dialog between Maitreyi and Yajnavalkya from Brihadaranyaka Upanishad
The Conversation of Yajnavalkya and Maitreyi on the Absolute Self - The Brihadaranyaka Upanishad - Chapter II
The love that you feel in respect of an object is in fact the love that you feel towards that which is called perfection and completeness. It is not really a love for the object. You have thoroughly misunderstood the whole point, even when you are clinging to a particular object as if it is the source of satisfaction. The mind does not want an object; it wants completeness of being. That is what it is searching for. Thus, when there is a promise of the fulfilment that it seeks, through the perception of an object that appears to be its counterpart, there is a sudden feeling that fullness is going to come, and there is a satisfaction even on the perception of that object; and there is an apparent satisfaction, just by the imagined possession of it together with the yearning for actual possession. So, what is it that you are asking for? You are not asking for any object or thing; you are asking for a condition of completeness in your being. "So, my dear friend," says Yājñavalkya, "nobody is dear. No object can be regarded as lovable or desirable. It is something else that you love and are asking for, but by a notion that is completely misconstrued, you believe that the object is loved."
When I got married, I thought I new what love was. I was married for nearly 6 years, but now separated.
So now I'm asking the question, What is love (in the context of spousal relationships)?
Thoughts welcome.
It angers me that nobody is playing thing song. Seriously somebody should have thought of this by now.
Sometimes just because you think of something, it doesn't mean that you should actually do it.
This is a very good element to bring to the question. Thanks for raising it.
Is it really love if it can be eroded over time?
Love is when she steals the blankets and you get over it right away.