strikeviperMKII
Well-Known Member
that makes them subjective...
Yes, it does. That doesn't mean you should ignore them.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
that makes them subjective...
Yes, but the Golden Rule is not motivated by self-interest. It's motivation comes from genuine empathy.
I think it is motivated by genuine response to God's love. The materialists are going to come back and say that empathy is a hard-wired, if sub-conscious, expression of the survival instinct.
No, that would never work. :no:
That's more like the Law of the Jungle than the Golden Rule.
Why not?Unless of course you want to argue that South-American Vampire Bats also respond to God's love... :sarcastic
Why not?
From Wikipedia:
The Golden Rule or ethic of reciprocity is a maxim, an ethical code, or a morality, that essentially states either of the following:
1. One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself (positive form).
2.One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated (negative/prohibitive form, also called the Silver Rule).
So that IS the Golden Rule.
Short and simple.
Or we could start with why we care about the future well-being of humankind.Right.
Could we perhaps first establish whether there is a god or not, preferably with some solid evidence, before we go off on a tangent and start wild speculations about what effects he/she might have on the world?
Yes, it does. That doesn't mean you should ignore them.
truth doesn't even acknowledge emotions much less ignore them
wold one rather be realistic or delusional?
One man's delusion is another man's reality.
that is true if truth were subjective...
Truth is not subjective. What we think is true, however, is very much subjective.
We can never know the former. We only have the latter.
Yes, but the Golden Rule is not motivated by self-interest. It's motivation comes from genuine empathy.
Truth is not subjective. What we think is true, however, is very much subjective.
We can never know the former. We only have the latter.
Doubt for doubt's sake leads to nothing, nothing but a masturbatory overuse of the intellect.
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous then sincere ingorance and conscientious stupidity.
Shakespeare wrote:
For sweetest thing turn sourest by their deeds;
Lilies that fester smell far worse then weeds.
As the chief moral guardian of the community, the church must implore men to be good and well-intentioned and must extol the virtues kindheartedness and conscientiousness. But somewhere along the way the church must remind men that devoid of intelligence, goodness and conscientiousness will become brutal forces leading to shameful crucifixions. Never must the Church tire of reminding men that they have a moral responsibility to be intelligent.
Must now we not admit that the church has often overlooked this moral demand for enlightenment? At times it has talked as though ingorance were a virtue and intelligence a crime. Through its obscurantism, closed-mindedness and obstinacy to new truth, the church has often unconsciously encouraged it worshipers to look askance upon intelligence.
But if we are to call ourselves Christians, we had better avoid intellectual and moral blindness.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
yes, read outhouse's comments for further information on the superiority of science. We are to follow and obey and not question it.
Like all great religions
Reason doesn't care about helping other people. It's self-interest.