YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
In what sense should Christians be Jews? Can you explain?I think it is both, because by what the Bible tells, “Christians” should also be Jews.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
In what sense should Christians be Jews? Can you explain?I think it is both, because by what the Bible tells, “Christians” should also be Jews.
Jesus is the Passover Lamb, the Unleavened Bread and the First Fruits from the dead.It is Jewish.
It has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity.
Nope.Jesus is the Passover Lamb, the Unleavened Bread and the First Fruits from the dead.
Didn't know Jesus was mixed with water that had been left out during the night and then baked for 18 minutes. Which revised NT says that?Jesus is the Passover Lamb, the Unleavened Bread and the First Fruits from the dead.
Do you believe, as many do, that what Moses wrote was basically based on myths?Didn't know Jesus was mixed with water that had been left out during the night and then baked for 18 minutes. Which revised NT says that?
No.Do you believe, as many do, that what Moses wrote was basically based on myths?
YupNope.
Symbolism in God's Passover and the Feast of Unleavened BreadDidn't know Jesus was mixed with water that had been left out during the night and then baked for 18 minutes. Which revised NT says that?
So Jesus was not mixed with water that was left out overnight and baked for 18 minutes?
What makes you think God killing innocent Egyptian babies is 'historical'?This Jewish holiday, commemorating an historical event in Jewish history
I don't know what @rosends will say, but I find that Difficult Theological Question ≠ Ahistorical Story.What makes you think God killing innocent Egyptian babies is 'historical'?
Agreed, but that's not presenting the case for why it *is* historical.I don't know what @rosends will say, but I find that Difficult Theological Question ≠ Ahistorical Story.
Then ask "Why do you believe that the Passover story is historical?". You presented it as a theological question.Agreed, but that's not presenting the case for why it *is* historical.
I'll ask the question the way it suits me to ask it thanks.Then ask "Why do you believe that the Passover story is historical?". You presented it as a theological question.
Sure thing. Didn't mean any offense.I'll ask the question the way it suits me to ask it thanks.
Odd, considering the Passover lamb isn't an atonement sacrifice. Oh well, god must've made a mistake.
What makes you think God killing innocent Egyptian babies is 'historical'?
Nope. Not better. Still bizarre.
I see. So god couldn't properly explain himself the first time 'round. Now I get it. Must've been the use of Hebrew. Good thing he switched to Greek.I guess the whole of the story could not be said well in the one sacrifice.
No, you misunderstand. They were guilty babies. That makes it historical.What makes you think God killing innocent Egyptian babies is 'historical'?