• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is the evolution that Bharatiya has and what is Darwin, and what are the similarities and differences?

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
The mistake I made is I was learning evolution, but I learned it as it was named after a person. So I thought style was named after Bharatiya, the same way theory is named after Darwin ; that was my mistake.
It is very common for certain religious people to refer to the Theory of Evolution as "Darwinism." But as you have probably learned, although Darwin may have provided the foundational elements, the theory today is much more than Darwin ever imagined. For example, basic genetics was unknown in Darwin's day. We also didn't have the collection of fossils that we have today, or the ability to date rocks. Darwin know nothing about punctuated equilibrium or what causes mutation. Calling the TOE "Darwinism" is like calling Physics "Newtonianism."

I have no idea how much you have learned about the subject. Perhaps you even know more than me. However, if you want a summary of the basics, this would be a good post for you to read:
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
You @GoodAttention would write about trading, so how do they greet before trading? How? What was their greeting culture? It wasn't invaded before trade, was it?

(2) 4.2ky event, and the movements of people around this time

(2) 4.2ky event, and the movements of people around this time

@GoodAttention

look how i fail at this evolution didn't kno2 how the basic of words

the how evolutin was named after darwin i learn he his dughter passed away, look how i fail
 

River Sea

Well-Known Member
@GoodAttention

4.2ky event, and the movements of people around this time. Darwin daughter passed away, and that's what brought Darwin to study Evolution. Was because his daughter passed away. (even though Darwin never used the word Evolutions.) as if to make this more difficult for me with language.

I found about AMT. AMT means merging with Indians

That taken me days to find and when I found it, I wanted to show.

So I'll give this to @Bharat Jhunjhunwala then who will appreciate this

I'm sure someone can figure out dates of 1900 BCE with AMT that era will be where @GoodAttention researches

The TAmil language during 1900 BCE, but only 1500 BCE for @Bharat Jhunjhunwala because @GoodAttention does a gap

gap what is gap, oh I thought gap was skip an era

only research 1900 BCE and skip 1500 BCE and let @Bharat Jhunjhunwala take the 1500 BCE

so if write 1500 BCE address this to @Bharat Jhunjhunwala and if write 1900 BCE address this to @GoodAttention

so AMT 1900 BCE merging of what Indians @GoodAttention
oh and no AMT 1500 BCE as @Bharat Jhunjhunwala claims
and maybe @GoodAttention will claim no AMT at 1900 BCE
as it's only OIT during 1900 BCE @GoodAttention and 1500 BCE OIT @Bharat Jhunjhunwala

The Out of India theory (OIT) means Indians in Ancient India left India
 
Last edited:

River Sea

Well-Known Member
It is very common for certain religious people to refer to the Theory of Evolution as "Darwinism." But as you have probably learned, although Darwin may have provided the foundational elements, the theory today is much more than Darwin ever imagined. For example, basic genetics was unknown in Darwin's day. We also didn't have the collection of fossils that we have today, or the ability to date rocks. Darwin know nothing about punctuated equilibrium or what causes mutation. Calling the TOE "Darwinism" is like calling Physics "Newtonianism."

I have no idea how much you have learned about the subject. Perhaps you even know more than me. However, if you want a summary of the basics, this would be a good post for you to read:

Basically, I was learning about Darwin as a person. And I stopped learning about when I read that Darwin's daughter passed away.

Then I learned the word gap else where.

Elsewhere (not here in this forum), people were enjoying a conversation and were writing their humor about this word gap.

I join their conversation, thinking I could join in their humor about this word gap.

Basically, their humor about the gap was about cars and how the gap was in the area of missing years. So for example, a 1934 Ford (GAP) 1970 car. This was humor to them.

This is how I learned the word gap from this humor. Because what the gap was about was there's no cars to be shown, yet people knew there were cars in those years., as they saw the 1934 Ford and the 1970 car side by side. This was shown as humor for all to laugh about. That was my first time learning this word gap with Evolution because this forum was about Evolution. That didn't happen in this forum that happen else where.

There will be times when the environment changes rapidly, and so evolution speeds up. Scientists call this "punctuated equilibrium." That's a good term to memorize.

That's interesting word "punctuated equilibrium" so that would mean evolution speeds up.

But as is common among humans when discussing any spectrum, we divide it up into pieces and label the pieces. So for example, visual light really doesn't have any natural barriers between red and orange -- that division of the spectrum is culturally defined (in fact, in some cultures, red, orange, and yellow are all considered the same color).

This is interesting because it shows that not all situations have enough vocabulary to describe. As described, some cultures have red, orange, and yellow as the same color.

And interesting how visual light really doesn't have any natural barriers between red and orange.
.
 

IndigoChild5559

Loving God and my neighbor as myself.
This is interesting because it shows that not all situations have enough vocabulary to describe. As described, some cultures have red, orange, and yellow as the same color.
You are quite correct. For example, here in California we only have one word for snow. But in the Inuit language (think arctic) they have all sorts of words for snow. Estimates often range from 10 to 50 or more, depending on how these words are counted and categorized.
 
Top