Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It started with black people for the billionth time.Woke as a term pretty much started with the "Social Justice Warrior".
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It started with black people for the billionth time.Woke as a term pretty much started with the "Social Justice Warrior".
Nope.It started with black people for the billionth time.
Your first sentence, and the next few words of the next sentence, are optimistic, but it's really at the crux of what I wonder about with this. It should be answered with some level of detail, how it will happen, because I don't know if simply saying 'organically' is the greatest explanation.. Life is getting more expensive, and that means that even established people here struggle to really own anything. The truth of it is, is that it seems like heavy influxes of immigrants can be a way of maintaining a situation, where the general citizen's ownership of assets is low, and the money they make seem to circulate from them into a richer set of hard asset owners. I am not numbers guy. But that what it seems likeAn increase in population means more commerce, and therefor more jobs. That stuff will work itself out unless the predatory capitalists (private equity groups) come and bilk their local economy from the outside. Which is what happened in Springfield, Ohio, and what is happening to local communities all across the country. They are ruthless, and have no concern whatever for the well being of the communities they destroy.
And folks like Donald Trump try to turn us all against each other when this happens. So we won't see who the real predators are.
And a half dozen of these groups now own most of the businesses and property in the United States. And they are gobbling up Canada and other nations as well. They are literally destroying the world with their greed. While we remain oblivious.
Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) originally meaning alertness to racial prejudice and discrimination.[1]Nope.
Edited by JJMC89 bot III at the time of this posting. A great Metalhead connoisseur!Woke is an adjective derived from African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) originally meaning alertness to racial prejudice and discrimination.[1]
Woke - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So you're just going to ignore the fact that you are demonstrably wrong?Edited by JJMC89 bot III at the time of this posting. A great Metalhead connoisseur!
Nope because the word itself in the African American Vernacular lexicon only meant aware or conscious.So you're just going to ignore the fact that you are demonstrably wrong?
So you now acknowledge that you were wrong and the use of the word DID start with AAV language?Nope because the word itself in the African American Vernacular lexicon only meant aware or conscious.
Not the bastardization we see in its modern usage.
No. I am not wrong. It's you who is twisting the term around. Maybe fess up with your ignorance of its etymology.So you now acknowledge that you were wrong and the use of the word DID start with AAV language?
Incidentally, who do you think is twisting it? Because if you admit it originally meant "aware or conscious" then that means anyone who uses the term as a pejorative slur are the ones twisting it, no?
Yes you are. You said the term "started with the 'Social Justice Warrior'". You now acknowledge it didn't.No. I am not wrong.
Since I don't use the term (except ironically or when people use it to describe me), obviously that's false.It's you who is twisting the term around.
I was unaware "woke" was an insect. You learn something new every day.Maybe fess up with your ignorance of its entomology.
The bastardization that the OP describes, you mean?Nope because the word itself in the African American Vernacular lexicon only meant aware or conscious.
Not the bastardization we see in its modern usage.
Origin Of The Word WOKE, And Why It’s Now Controversial
In recent years, the term "woke" has become a ubiquitous part of the cultural and political lexicon, often evoking strong reactions and sparking heatedscientificorigin.com
Are you trying to twist it's original meaning?
You are attempting humor, right?No. I am not wrong. It's you who is twisting the term around. Maybe fess up with your ignorance of its entomology.
The bastardization that the OP describes, you mean?
That no one applies to himself?
Indeed. The word has been co-opted by less than healthy groups, and its meaning reversed and distorted.
No. The real meaning was aware and conscious.You are attempting humor, right?
OH yes there is.They either are or they are not. There is no "over the top" regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Its spell /word checks fault , but I corrected the insect part. ;0)I was unaware "woke" was an insect. You learn something new every day.
Last time you brought this up you mentioned never reading White Fragility by Robin DiAngelo. You said you watched a bunch of yootoob videos about it. Have you since read it or are you going on about a book you still haven't read?So to reiterate, let's take just two authors of many: Ibram X Kendi and Robin DiAngelo. They are both best selling authors and they both do speaking tours. At least hundreds of thousands (if not millions), of people have bought their books and gone to see them speak. One of Kendi's books has around 28,000 reviews on Amazon with a 4.5 star rating.
You're making this far more complicated than it is.Your first sentence, and the next few words of the next sentence, are optimistic, but it's really at the crux of what I wonder about with this. It should be answered with some level of detail, how it will happen, because I don't know if simply saying 'organically' is the greatest explanation.. Life is getting more expensive, and that means that even established people here struggle to really own anything. The truth of it is, is that it seems like heavy influxes of immigrants can be a way of maintaining a situation, where the general citizen's ownership of assets is low, and the money they make seem to circulate from them into a richer set of hard asset owners. I am not numbers guy. But that what it seems like
Unless the immigrant has a particularly success business, or skill of some kind, where they get in on the pie. But other than that, the optimistic way to see it, would be to hope they can really create those jobs that you say would be generated. Which is beyond my ability to really see how that might occur, they would have to be things that are maybe not based on necessity in the modern economy, but still allow for growth and circulation.. I don't know, I can't compute what that would mean at this time
As long as gdp keeps expanding, my sense of it is that novelty in work has to expand. It seems like new projects have to be generated that will continuously employ a lot of people
Hmmm ..., what is 'too much diversity'? What is 'too much equality'? What is 'too much inclusion'?OH yes there is.