sovietchild
Well-Known Member
The problem with ISIS is completely different, and far more complex.
And I don't think it is a good idea to compare terrorists with Muhammad. You really don't want to go down that roads.
Muhammad was a man of his time. To me, Muhammad was a politician and warlord, like other warlords in Arabia at that time.
I wouldn't call Muhammad and his followers "terrorists", but I wouldn't call any of Muhammad's enemies "terrorists". Muslims, Meccans, Jews and Byzantines are not terrorists; none of them are.
If you start calling other people terrorists back in the 7th century, you would lose, because then people would be free to compare Muhammad's action as that of a terrorist.
So please, I would advise you not to bring terrorism up in our argument.
Terrorism? No, no. I was just giving you an example. If ISIS is your enemy, then is it okay to capture those people (drivers) who bring them (ISIS) good stuff?