Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
I thought you weren't arguing about the evolutionary origins of language...Does the brain hardwire itself and if so where does it receive the instructions from?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I thought you weren't arguing about the evolutionary origins of language...Does the brain hardwire itself and if so where does it receive the instructions from?
that begs the question..why wasn't the bible written in that language?Following this line of thought, I would think it was more likely a language that was further evolved than what we have today because we stiil have the rudimentary structure which enables us to translate other languages we were not raised with.
The brain is hardwired to learn and use language because we are social animals.
It's probably to do with DNA, because evolved (if you're a creationist, humour me here) from social animals.
What do you mean, 'where does it receive instructions from'?
DNA is chemically encoded instruction. Is it not? Language requires an encoder and a decoder. What is doing the encoding and then the decoding? This applies to language and DNA and I am not referring to the process itself.
that begs the question..why wasn't the bible written in that language?
Encoder = Society, the others users of the language + timeDNA is chemically encoded instruction. Is it not? Language requires an encoder and a decoder. What is doing the encoding and then the decoding? This applies to language and DNA and I am not referring to the process itself.
No one speaks this language any more that we know of and I believe it would allow God to separately deal with the various people groups after the Tower of Babel. What happened before when they all spoke one language?
Encoder = Society, the others users of the language + time
Decoder = The brain, through learning the words and their meanings and applying them
But this isn't the thread for this.
If it was taught to Adam directly from God, then at the very least it would be a neat concept.Ok, sorry for sidetracking. Just asking the same question most linguist ask. does it really matter in the end what Adam spoke? What purpose does it serve us?
are you saying that god can only communicate in a different language and he created languages that would keep us from understanding god?
which was?No,I am saying according to what i understand from reading this story that God pusposely seperated the peoples languages in order to keep them from making the same mistake twice.
which was?
According to what I understand they thought the could rise up to heaven and pull God down, but we could further this conversation elsewhere if you would like to start a thread.
No one speaks this language any more that we know of and I believe it would allow God to separately deal with the various people groups after the Tower of Babel. What happened before when they all spoke one language?
I've studied linguistics, and we were never asked those kind of questions..Ok, sorry for sidetracking. Just asking the same question most linguist ask.
It'd be pretty neat, we'd learn about the first language, and if it was a "Heavenly" language or whatever.Does it really matter in the end what Adam spoke? What purpose does it serve us?
I've studied linguistics, and we were never asked those kind of questions..
It'd be pretty neat, we'd learn about the first language, and if it was a "Heavenly" language or whatever.
But I don't believe in Adam and Eve. Nor the Bible.
Because no sane person would think Enochian is the primal language. :yes:Why does everyone ignore me when I suggest Enochian?
Why does everyone ignore me when I suggest Enochian?