I hardly ever pray, or at least very rarely.
Maya
It's really hard top say about the 'average' 'Hindu' because most people rarely talk about it because it's personal. As a group. we're not very chatty about that sort of stuff.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I hardly ever pray, or at least very rarely.
Maya
I am Hindu and not ashamed or shy in proclaiming it, that is why i am a Hindu.
I am a Hindu because i respect my parents, elders, Devah and Devi, purohita and family.
I am Hindu because i respect all people.
I am Hindu because i see my self in all beings.
I am Hindu because i feel like a Hindu.
I am Hindu because a non-Hindu will clearly declare their non-Hinduness.
I am Hindu because i Love the peace that it provides me.
I am Hindu because that is my identity.
I am Hindu because i feel the presence of the Paramatman in the temples and in my self.
I am Hindu because i think this earth is my mother and father.
I am Hindu because i think this universe is my mother and father.
I am Hindu because i treat my Mother and Father as my entire Universe.
I am Hindu because..................... I Am HINDU
Aupmanyav: Average? For a Hindu? Perhaps women worship once a day in the morning as also visit the temple. Some men have their puja in the morning. Men would visit the temple in the evening. That serves as a community visit as well as worship. Some would go on particular days to temples of their deities, for example Tuesday to a Hanuman temple, Friday to a Devi temple, etc. Some would neither offer any puja or visit the temples except rarely. And yes, as Vinayaka said, Gods or Goddesses would always be with us, whether travelling in a public bus, private car, the rail engine driver will perhaps have an image in the engine. Never visited in the cockpit of an airplane, perhaps pilots also may have some thing like that. And sure, 'Sri Ganeshaya Namah', 'Ganapati Bappa Moria', 'Jai Mata ki' is when you start a car.
This is the only part of your statements which I don't quite understand, majjanam is an important part of snAnam regardless of whether the water is flowing or not (although I agree that it's better if the water is flowing, like in a nadI), so wouldn't it be preferable to bathe and then pour water on yourself rather than take a shower?[FONT="]Most avoid stagnant water, will shower rather than bathe.[/FONT]
I know plenty of shaiva-s who don't worship avatAra-s, does that make them non Hindu? Also, if you follow varNAshrama dharma, shUdra-s cannot recite the veda-s and therefore by default cannot perform sandhyAvandanam. Are you saying that shUdra-s are not Hindus?He who has perfect faith in the Law of Karma, the law of reincarnation Avatara, ancestor worship, Varnashrama Dharma, Vedas and existence of God, he who practises the instructions given in the Vedas with faith and earnestness, he who does Sandhya, Sraaddha, Pitri-Tarpana and the Pancha-Maha-Yajnas, he who follows the Varnashrama Dharmas, he who worships the Avataras and studies the Vedas, is a Hindu. This is the definition given by some highly cultured men. This is the only correct and complete definition. -- Swami Sivananda
This is indeed the right definition. :namaste
and your signature has a quote from Jiddu KrishnamurtiHe who has perfect faith in the Law of Karma, the law of reincarnation Avatara, ancestor worship, Varnashrama Dharma, Vedas and existence of God, he who practises the instructions given in the Vedas with faith and earnestness, he who does Sandhya, Sraaddha, Pitri-Tarpana and the Pancha-Maha-Yajnas, he who follows the Varnashrama Dharmas, he who worships the Avataras and studies the Vedas, is a Hindu.” This is the definition given by some highly cultured men. This is the only correct and complete definition. -- Swami Sivananda
When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind.
I know plenty of shaiva-s who don't worship avatAra-s, does that make them non Hindu?
Also, if you follow varNAshrama dharma, shUdra-s cannot recite the veda-s and therefore by default cannot perform sandhyAvandanam. Are you saying that shUdra-s are not Hindus?
That's not what your quote from sivAnanda saraswatI said though,, you wrote "...who follows the Varnashrama Dharmas, he who worships the Avataras and studies the Vedas, is a Hindu.”I am sure this can also qualify as theistic beliefs.
It's not just in the smR^iti-s though, the view that shUdra-s should not recite the veda-s is present even in the commentaries of medieval vedAntin-s; Adisha~Nkara is extremely strict in this regard and claims that molden tin and lac should be poured down the ears of a shUdra who listens to the veda-s and uses the vR^iddhagautama (it's either that or the manusmR^iti, I can't remember at the moment) to support his claim:The part of the smritis which is outdated should be deleted or edited. This updation is a constant point in Hinduism, lack of which resulted in the deterioration of India .
Guys, this tread N°2 have been created to avoid exactly what you are doing: endless, off road, sterile debate.
Make your own tread in the debate section for the love of Ganesh we are tired of this.
I'm don't want to get into an argument, but you're being silly. All I am saying is that per varNa dharma, i.e doing your duty as per ones varNa, a shUdra is not supposed to be reciting veda-s or doing sandhyAvandanam, just as I being a kShatrIya am not in a position to be a pujArI. When sivAnand is saying that one must recite veda-s and follow varNAshrama to be Hindu, he is excluding shUdra-s from being Hindu, hence I pointed out my objection. Similarly, he states that one must worship avatAra-s to be Hindu, hence excluding certain shaiva-s, which I think is foolish of him. Also, please don't misinterpret my quotes; I am not casteist, nor would I ever agree with Adisha~NkarAchArya's "punishment" prescribed for shUdra-s who listen to the veda-s. However, from my readings, the shAstra-s do not seem to support the view that a shUdra should recite large portions of the veda-s, although this is kind of a blessing rather than a curse, as they attain mokShaH much more easily, which is a benefit of the kaliyuga according to the viShNupurANam:
"Being thus addressed by the Munis, Vyása smiled, and said to them, "Hear, excellent sages, why I uttered the words 'Well done, well done.' The fruit of penance, of continence, of silent prayer, and the like, practised in the Krita age for ten years, in the Treta for one year, in the Dwápara for a month, is obtained in the Kali age in a day and night: therefore did I exclaim, 'Excellent, excellent, is the Kali age!' That reward which a man obtains in the Krita by abstract meditation, in the Treta by sacrifice, in the Dwápara by adoration, he receives in the Kali by merely reciting the name of Keśava. In the Kali age a man displays the most exalted virtue by very little exertion; therefore, pious sages, who know what virtue is, I was pleased with the Kali age. Formerly the Vedas were to be acquired by the twice-born through the diligent observance of self-denial; and it was their duty to celebrate sacrifices conformably to the ritual. Then idle prayers, idle feasts, and fruitless ceremonies, were practised but to mislead the twice-born; for although observed by them devoutly, yet, in consequence of some irregularity in their celebration, sin was incurred in all their works, and what they ate, or what they drank, did not effect the fulfilment of their desires. In all their objects the twice-born enjoyed no independence, and they attained their respective spheres only with exceeding pain. The Śúdra, on the contrary, more fortunate than they, reaches his assigned station by rendering them service, and performing merely the sacrifice of preparing food, in which no rules determine what may or may not be eaten, what may or may not be drunk. Therefore, most excellent sages, is the Śúdra fortunate."
That's not what your quote from sivAnanda saraswatI said though,, you wrote "...who follows the Varnashrama Dharmas, he who worships the Avataras and studies the Vedas, is a Hindu.
Hello JS.
Pls state this in the thread I created so that we won't derail the thread.
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/hinduism-dir/161196-can-shudras-study-vedas.html
Since the other thread is totally derailed, I felt it was time to redo it. I read most of it over and edited the OP substantially, adding what others had added, and combining several points. It never was intended as a test of sorts, but as a reflective tool, mostly for newcomers exploring our faith. In the west, Hinduism is often very misunderstood, most especially the practices.
Clearly anyone can call themselves anything. Whether or not an individual's take on it conforms to wider ideas about it doesn't really matter. I also sensed that a few people felt it their absolute right, insinuating that I and others felt that there is something wrong with you if you're not a Hindu. There is nothing wrong with being a non-Hindu. I believe that this comes from the good/bad and proselytizing mentality often seen in the west. There is an over-riding good/bad philosophy that is occasionally taken to extremes. Well, I certainly don't feel that way, nor do I thing other Hindus do. In fact, I encourage doing what your heart feels is right. [FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Practices[/FONT]
[FONT="]Many Hindus do a daily puja, and some form of sadhana.
Many attend temples regularly. Some do rarely. Some do often.
Most have a Hindu name. Some converts and adoptives dont.
Most have had a name-giving ceremony.
Some meditate daily.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Some do regular japa.
Most practice pilgrimage near of far, some often, some occasionally.
Most hang out with other Hindus.
Most listen to Hindu music primarily or exclusively. Some dont listen to music at all.
Some have taken diksha from a Hindu teacher.
Some are vegetarian, some are not. Most shun beef.
Many dream about Hindu stuff, indicating not just a Hindu conscious, but also a Hindu subconcious.
Most call themselves Hindu in public.
Many would consult an ayurvedic doctor.
Many will consult a Hindu astrologer.
Many know their nakshatras. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Many avoid wearing leather.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most know at least a few bhajans.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most are comfortable eating with fingers.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most never proselytize. A few do.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most avoid stagnant water, will shower rather than bathe.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most use incense. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most practice charity to the poor, to temples, to schools, etc.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Many will prostrate at temple or home. Some dont. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most celebrate festivals, varying on sect. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most have Hindu pictures in the house, and have a shrine. Some dedicate entire rooms.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Many read scripture. Many dont.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most are generally aware of their Hinduness. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most use a Hindu greeting like Namaste or Namaskaram.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most are great hosts, welcoming guests as Gods. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most dont use intoxicants, including tobacco, alcohol, and other stimulants. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most dont object to being called Hindu. Some do, either out of embarrassment, or from taking the stance that Hindu is an incorrect term historically. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most were born in India, and most are born Indians. Almost all accept the many converts, adoptives, and returnees. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most are householders, some are ascetics. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Some practice penances, like fasting. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most perform some samskaras, or rites of passage. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Almost all practice cremation. [/FONT]
[FONT="]A few practice hatha yoga. Most dont. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most wear Hindu clothing, and dress modestly. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Beliefs[/FONT]
[FONT="]All believe in freedom of religion. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most believe the inherent divinity within all mankind.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Most respect the environment, and love Mother Earth. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most respect other faiths, although importance put on them varies.
All believe in reincarnation, although specifics vary.
All believe in karma, although specifics vary.
All believe in a divinity, either within all things, separate, or both. This divinity can have form, be formless, or be both. [/FONT]
[FONT="]All accept the Vedas as authoritative. Most employ other scriptures from within the vast array of Hindu scriptures.
Most have goals that are Veda-based.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Almost all stick with Hinduism alone, but some complement their faith with aspects of other faiths. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Many know their branch, sect, or school. Many dont. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Many are sect-centric, and know little about other sects or traditions beyond their own. [/FONT]
[FONT="]All see moksha as the ultimate goal of life, but recognise the other goals as legitimate. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most believe in practicing dharma, although definitions vary. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Nearly all believe in ahimsa. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Most recognise and respect holy men and women of all traditions. [/FONT]
Since the other thread is totally derailed, I felt it was time to redo it. I read most of it over and edited the OP substantially, adding what others had added, and combining several points. It never was intended as a test of sorts, but as a reflective tool, mostly for newcomers exploring our faith. .
I'm hoping that this time it doesn't degenerate into a debate, but I don't have high expectations either.
[FONT="]Many are sect-centric, and know little about other sects or traditions beyond their own. [/FONT]
[FONT="][/FONT]