BilliardsBall
Veteran Member
Most of the fallen angels are found in the NT, not the OT.
The quotes from OT are mostly just incompetent interpretations by Christian apologists.
Take Isaiah 1:23 for instance, if you think this verse is correct, and that “princes of rebels and companions of thieves” referred to fallen angels, then you and the person who wrote this webpage and quoted this passage would be wrong, because you both have taken the verse out of context.
If you both to read the whole chapter, Isaiah 1, then you would know that this passage related to the people of the kingdom of Judah, and of Zion, as in Jerusalem. 1:23 has nothing to do with fallen angels or demons.
Isaiah 14:12-14 is also taken out of context, ever since bloody Jerome translated the passages, and translated the “Day Star son Of Dawn” and wrongly used “Lucifer”. This whole passages is only a small part of the whole, in which the “Day Star” is really the “King of Babylonia” (see Isaiah 1:3-4) and his kingdom, not Satan/Devil or any fallen angel.
Try reading the most of the chapter (from 1 to 27) which concerned the king of Babylon, instead of selective verses.
Some of the OT quotes have to do with angels, but nothing to do with fallen angels.
And if you understand Judaism in regarding to angel lore, there are no “fallen angels”, because angels have no free will, so they couldn’t possibly rebel against God.
As I stated in earlier replies, the rebellion of fallen angels come from the Hellenistic Book of Enoch.
I'm unwilling to debate hermeneutics with you, further, you make it sound like Isaiah is the only source I cited in the OT. There were quite a few passages. Regardless, if you came to believe that there were fallen angels in the OT, it wouldn't change the fact that the OT is quoted hundreds and hundreds of the time in the NT, the apocrypha, arguably, once or twice at most.