-Peacemaker-
.45 Cal
I would be a non theistic satanist. I dig the whole thing about Sagan being a symbol of rebellion and I see the appeal of using no discipline whatsoever and engaging in all our 'natural' desires
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
This is mostly correct, but discipline is required, because reckless behavior only lands a person in jail or worse. A lot of study goes into how to get what we want ethically and lawfully.I would be a non theistic satanist. I dig the whole thing about Sagan being a symbol of rebellion and I see the appeal of using no discipline whatsoever and engaging in all our 'natural' desires
You'd still be bound by your personal ethics and morals of society, so it's not a complete free for allYou have to ask?
An atheist, of course. I'd be able to do anything without constraints, woohoo!
An atheist, of course. I'd be able to do anything without constraints, woohoo!
Don't count on it. Sometimes people do the wrong, knowing it is wrong, depending on how many and how heavy defense lines are there. One less defense like, one step closer to it
Nope, I'm implying they don't follow the many restrictions I have to follow. But I guess you do have a point. My choice of words was bad. I'll edit it, sorry about that.Implying atheists lack a conscience and the ability to reason.
I know. I didn't say I'm not willing to deal with consequences... if I convert, that is.Actions still have real world consequences, regardless of whether or not one believes in magical consequences.