FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
So according to this video (start at about 2 minutes if you are in a rush)"Palestine" isn't the Arabs' homeland. Arabs were imported. Or exported. Whatever. They moved.
What a great evidence !
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So according to this video (start at about 2 minutes if you are in a rush)"Palestine" isn't the Arabs' homeland. Arabs were imported. Or exported. Whatever. They moved.
Yes, without a doubt as we have always had their back, and we have never trusted the PRoC. We will have their back even for our own protection because of our commitments to other countries in the region besides them, including some with military bases, such as Japan, S. Korea, Guam (an American protectorate), etc. Maybe you think we should desert them all as well?"Without a doubt"?
I'm not seeing this. I have the distinct impression that trade consideration is foremost and "democratization" is in the back seat. What makes you think that a Chinese republic like Taiwan will get the sort of support that Israel gets right now?
Communist China is worth multi billions in profit and democratic Taiwan is not. What makes you think we have their back?
Tom
Yes, without a doubt as we have always had their back, and we have never trusted the PRoC. We will have their back even for our own protection because of our commitments to other countries in the region besides them, including some with military bases, such as Japan, S. Korea, Guam (an American protectorate), etc. Maybe you think we should desert them all as well?
We should be able to walk and chew gum at the same time, and if we were to take your advice, we'd have to walk away from our military alliances the world over that includes many countries that we give aid to. Is that what you want? Do you think this will help even us in the long run?No.
But I don't want to spend money supporting another countries military, then claim we can't afford to feed poor people or doctor sick people.
Which is what we do.
If a people can pay for a nuclear arsenal and air force and such, they need my financial support less than people who can't feed the kids.
But Israel gets my money and South Sudan doesn't.
Tom
To a large extent, yes. We actually pay much money for our bases there in order to protect them and other allies.Does the US gives money aid to Japan and S. Korea ?
To a large extent, yes. We actually pay much money for our bases there in order to protect them and other allies.
Glad you brought this up.
I am pretty good at ruffling feathers and accustomed to the fall out. But what I am reading in your posts is more like schizophrenia. Why do you think I am advocating walking away from all the USA allies when I say it want to stop sending billions of dollars to Israel?Well, usually I'm not this frank with where I'm coming from, and I'm sure I just ruffled some more feathers, but so be it.
I believe AIPAC is work for Israel not USA people .No.
But I don't want to spend money supporting another countries military, then claim we can't afford to feed poor people or doctor sick people.
Which is what we do.
If a people can pay for a nuclear arsenal and air force and such, they need my financial support less than people who can't feed the kids.
But Israel gets my money and South Sudan doesn't.
Tom
I will teach you a Hebrew word: הלואי ("hal'vai")I believe AIPAC is work for Israel not USA people .
that's why if find it BIG paradox that USA had thousand or millions of homeless and Israel don't had 1 single homeless man or 1 homeless family !
I think if you reread my post #145, I covered my general feelings on this, including what you commented on in your last two sentences, which is entirely incorrect. This part of my post should have given you that impression: "I do believe that much of our foreign aid is screwed up and misdirected. I do believe this country has all too often acted out of selfishness and overt violence on way too many occasions." Maybe I should have spelled that out more thoroughly, but another part of what I posted I think should have been clearer to you: " I think there's even a legitimate argument in terms of what our priorities should be in terms of humanitarian versus military aid, so we're really not as far apart as it may seem we are." Again, maybe that's too vague, so I will take some responsibility for that as I thought I was being clearer than the way you apparently took it.I am pretty good at ruffling feathers and accustomed to the fall out. But what I am reading in your posts is more like schizophrenia. Why do you think I am advocating walking away from all the USA allies when I say it want to stop sending billions of dollars to Israel?
Do you really make a distinction between sending food aid to hungry people and high tech weapons to Israel? If you do, I'm not seeing where.
Tom
Even though I normally abhor Fox "News", I'm in a hurry so I grabbed this article as I cite the first two paragraphs:Do you think the people in this forum are idiots to believe your nonsense ?
Japan agrees to five-year pact to pay for U.S. defense.
YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan — Japan and the U.S. have agreed on a five-year plan that will maintain Japan’s current spending to support U.S. military forces in the country, but reduce the number of Japanese workers on base, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced Tuesday.
The Japanese government will spend 188.1 billion yen, or $2.02 billion, annually through 2016 on Japanese employee salaries, utilities and base maintenance. Japan has been spending roughly the same annual amount under a three-year deal that will expire in March. The government spent a high of $3.17 billion in 1999.
http://www.stripes.com/news/pacific...ive-year-pact-to-pay-for-u-s-defense-1.128712
ah ok , thanks for correct my info , so your homeles had tents , i just wonder who is inside these tents ?I will teach you a Hebrew word: הלואי ("hal'vai")
Would that that were so, if only that was the truth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_Israel
Even though I normally abhor Fox "News", I'm in a hurry so I grabbed this article as I cite the first two paragraphs:
WASHINGTON – The United States is footing more of the bill for overseas bases in Germany, Japan and South Korea even as the military reduces the number of American troops in Europe and strategically repositions forces in Asia, a congressional report says.
The exhaustive, yearlong investigation by the Senate Armed Services Committee focused on costs and burden-sharing as the United States spends more than $10 billion a year to back up the U.S. military presence overseas, with 70 percent of the amount expended in the three nations. The figure does not include military personnel costs... -- http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...-overseas-bases-despite-cuts-to-military.html
they don't all have tentsah ok , thanks for correct my info , so your homeles had tents , i just wonder who is inside these tents ?
but I don't think it's reach to phenomen ?
and Israel don't had 1 single homeless man or 1 homeless family !
so your homeles had tents , i just wonder who is inside these tents ?
that's newAh it hurts so much.
they don't all have tents
http://www.timesofisrael.com/for-israeli-politicians-poverty-is-someone-elses-problem/
You made a statement that there are no homeless in Israel.that link shows one man (not identified) lay in the street (photo in back) , and poverity of Arabs town lol
I will teach you a Hebrew word: הלואי ("hal'vai")
Would that that were so, if only that was the truth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_Israel
actually, from 0 to 1 is an infinite increase. 800 to 500,000 is only 625% (I think -- I'm not a math guy).Huge difference between 800 and 500,000
Over 800 homeless people living in Israel
More than 500,000 people homeless in the United States: report
There was some anti-Jewish sentiment, but that wasn't the entire reason. Some people like to use that to argue that the creation of Israel was a miracle by-the-way, but there was what you might call pro-Jesus-Christ-return sentiment also pushing for the re-creation of a state. I think many weren't aware of that, but it was quite strong both in USA and Britain. Whether people consciously pushed for its creation I cannot say, but there was a great deal of wishing.Call me a cynic if you want. But I think anti-Judaism had more to do with the "creation" of Israel than guilt.
Nobody wanted Jews around. By giving them a state the anti-Jews could absolve themselves of bigotry. Jewish people didn't have to stay in Christendom, they could go to Israel. Staying in France or the USA or wherever was freely choosing to stay in an anti Jewish culture and that absolved the bigots from responsibility. The Jews had a choice.
It also gave western powers a beach head near the oil fields of the gulf. After WWII, access to petroleum was known to be crucial to global power.
I don't think kindness and charity had a thing to do with the creation of Israel. Greed for wealth and power were the motivations.
Things haven't changed much either.
Tom